2010.03.08 独立写作

jacknonplusUID: 2703793

Universities should give every member of the team the same grade when the ream finishes a project.
Should each one in a team with the same project get equally the same grade? According to different backgrounds, pensonalites, and life values, the statement usually divergent. As far as I am concerned, I firmly contended that every member should have their own score according to their performance.

At first, the score should be judged by the member’ effort but not because they are in the same team. Although people in the same team they work together just like a same person, but they act differently. For example, when you want to pick up a watch in front of you, which part of body need to move? Obviously, all of them, you knees, foots, legs, hands……but which part of your body act most importantly? Maybe the answers different. One thing is certain, there must be some part did more effort than others. Just like all the team memebers doing a same project, some of them might did little effort to finish their job, some of them did more effort to finish it. As the consequences, the members who make more efforts deserve a higher grade.

Another essential factor accounting on my propensity is that people all get the same socre would somehow minus team member’s activity. Here’s an example, in the early 1960s, most of the Chinese work together in a big factory, worked equally long and all got equally paid. At that time, the productivity of the country stands still at the same point for years. Then the change comes, people who worked hard or had a good performance would get more paid. Hence the productivity had been increased for quite a large range. So here comes to mine point, team members should get the score they deserve.

In conclusion, after discussed above, we can safely come to the point that team members should get their own scores according to what they did.

zhisnoopyUID: 2703722

Should each one in a team with the same project gets equally the same grade? According to different backgrounds, pensonalites, and life values, the statement usually divergent. As far as I am concerned, I firmly contended that every member should have their own score according to their performance.

At first, the score should be judged by the member’ effort but not because they are in the same team. Although people in the same team they work together just like a same person, but they act differently. For example, when you want to pick up a watch in front of you, which part of body need to move? Obviously, all of them, you knees, foots, legs, hands……but which part of your body act most importantly? Maybe the answers different. One thing is certain, there must be some part did more effort than others. Just like all the team memebers doing a same project, some of them might did little effort to finish their job, some of them did more effort to finish it. As the consequences, the members who make more efforts deserve a higher grade.

Another essential factor accounting on my propensity is that people all get the same socre would somehow minus team member’s activity. Here’s an example, in the early 1960s, most of the Chinese work together in a big factory, worked equally long and all got equally paid. At that time, the productivity of the country stands still at the same point for years. Then the change comes, people who worked hard or had a good performance would get more paid. Hence the productivity had been increased for quite a large range. So here comes to mine point, team members should get the score they deserve.

In conclusion, after discussed above, we can safely come to the point that team members should get their own scores according to what they did.

zhisnoopyUID: 2703722

囧，为毛我改的东西都没了？？？没天理啊！！！！！！

zhisnoopyUID: 2703722

Should each one in a team with the same project gets equally the same grade? According to different backgrounds, pensonalites, and life values, the statement usually divergent. As far as I am concerned, I firmly contended that every member should have their own score according to their performance.

At first, the score should be judged by the member’ effort rather than the reason that they are in the same team. Although people in the same team work together just like a same person, but they act differently. For example, when you want to pick up a watch in front of you, which part of body need to move? Obviously, all of them, your knees, foots, legs, hands……but which part of your body act most importantly? Maybe the answers are different. One thing is certain, there must be some part did more effort than others. Just like all the team memebers doing a same project, some of them might do little effort to finish their job, while others might do more efforts to finish it. As the consequences, the members who make more efforts deserve a higher grade.

Another essential factor accounting on my propensity is that people all get the same socre would somehow minus team member’s activity（这句我觉得有问题但是不知道怎么改，因为minus是adj，然后would somehow minus team member’s activity这句话就没有谓语动词了？）. Here’s an example, in the early 1960s, most of the Chinese work together in a big factory, worked equally long（for the same hours，换成这个是不是好点？） and all got equally paid. At that time, the productivity of the country stands still at the same point for years. Then the change comes, people who worked hard or had a good performance would get more paid. Hence the productivity had been increased for quite a large range. So here comes to mine point, team members should get the score they deserve.

In conclusion, after discussed above, we can safely come to the point that team members should get their own scores according to what they did.

jacknonplusUID: 2703793

2010.03.09 独立写作

p.s.我怎么找不到在哪里粘word啊？。。。。。。

Many teachers assign homework to students every day. Do you think that daily homework is necessary for students? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.


Should teachers assign homework to students every day? According to different backgrounds, personalities and life values, the statement might be divergent. As far as I am concerned, I would definitely contend that students should take some homework everyday for their own good.

First and the most, everyday homework could help the student understanding the courses he or she taken. Although taking everyday homework might be some kind of burden to most of the students, but everyday homework indeed facilitate the student to think more and think deeper of the course. For myself as an instance, when I was a freshman in college, I found that the teacher in college usually do not assign homework to students which is quite opposite with my high school teachers. I was so happy and felt released that finally I can have a lot of free time instead of working on my homeworks. But as the first term ended, I suddenly found that I barely know nothing about my courses and just study in the class is far from enough. Then I realized the importance of everyday homework. It would help the student thinking and understanding of the courses.

Another reason accounting for my propensity is the fact that everyday homework is not the burden but the useful tool to our study. It would help us a lot in taking the courses. Here’s an instance, the survey between elite shows that when they were students, most of them had taken a review of the courses they study everyday, and maybe that’s the reason why they had a better grade than others. So if we take everyday homework the teacher assigned, it means that you’ve been study the course twice which would definitely help you remember the knowledge. As the consequences, everyday homework is a very useful tool in taking courses.

In conclusion, after discussed above, we can safely come to the point that the teacher should assign everyday homework to students for their better study.

speedzshawUID: 2556376

3.9 修改 by speedzshaw

howard_hhqUID: 2648506

Should teachers assign homework to students every day? According to different backgrounds, personalities and life values, the statement might be divergent. As far as I am concerned, I would definitely contend that students should take some homework everyday for their own good
开头简洁明了，赞

! i: g0 O1 o  f6 u  s4 C; k9 F4 lFirst and the most, everyday homework could help the student understanding the courses he or she taken. Although taking everyday homework might be some kind of burden to most of the students, but everyday homework indeed facilitate the student to think more and think(去掉) deeper of the course. For myself(换成take my perience) as an instance, when I was a freshman in college, I found that the teacher in college usually do not assign homework to students which is quite
opposite with
my high school teachers. I was so happy and felt released that finally I can have a lot of free time instead of working on my homeworks. But as the first term ended, I suddenly found that I barely know nothing about my courses and just study in the class is far from enough. Then I realized the importance of everyday homework. It would help the student thinking and understanding of the courses.
例子举的很好

Another reason accounting for my propensity is the fact that everyday homework is not the burden but the useful tool to(for) our study. It would help us a lot in taking the courses. Here’s an instance, the survey between elite shows that when they were students, most of them had taken a review of the courses they study everyday, and maybe that’s the reason why they had a better grade than others. So if we take everyday homework the teacher assigned, it means that you’ve been study the course twice which would definitely help you remember the knowledge. As the consequences, everyday homework is a very useful tool in taking courses
感觉你这个理由好像很上面那个理由有点重

: ]" Q" W# M* KIn conclusion, after discussed above(去掉), we can safely come to the point that the teacher should assign everyday homework to students for their better study.

你的表达很清晰，造句能力很好，不但段之间有逻辑，感觉你的段内逻辑也挺强的
你的第二段感觉和第二段有重

jacknonplusUID: 2703793

3.15
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephones have had more positive effects on human kind than televisions

The debate over whether telephones or televisions had more positive effects on human kind has been raging for some time.　Ｉtend to agree with telephones had more positive effects than televisions.

Firstly, telephones could help people better communicate with each other rather than televisions. Telephones are technology that help people talk to their friends and families even if they are far apart. If you miss your friend, want to tell good news to your parents, just a phone call would fulfill all your need. Aslo, if you are afraid of facing someone or something, a phone call would always keep you from embarrassing. Nowadays we can hardly imagine one can survive in the world without any trace of telephones. While, communicating with others, television seems do not have this kind of function.

Secondly, though televisions extremely expended our horization with its vivid sounds and colorful pictures, it just spread the knowledge or the news on purpose. On the other hand, telephones is more flexible. For instance, if you turn on the TV right now, you will find there are full of useless advertisements which I can hardly bear them. Television in nowadays is quite torturing, nevermind it’s positive effects on human minds. It’s quite opposite that telephones could help you find what you need more efficiently. If you want book a sit in restaurant or check whether your book is outlined, a phone call would serve these problems.

In conclusion, after discussed above, I believe that man can live without televisions but without telephones.