51航海的 作文本

51航海UID: 2738581

3 月15日  08  5.9 北美
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on the public transportation.

Nowadays people in growing number are becoming to realize the importance of the improvement of the Internet and the public transportation. Some individuals hold the view that government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on the public transportation. As I am concerned, I highly agree with the statement that we should invest more money in increasing the access to the internet, rather than the public transportation.

First of all, there is a heated argument that a large number of people are advocating that the government should make more convenient conditions for them to utilize the wireless internet in the public regions, such as in the railway station, around the super market and in the hospital. With the development of economy, it is widely acknowledged that the wireless net is playing an essential role in our daily life. People are becoming to rely on considerable information in variety of fields, especially for those who are always traveling from one place to another during a quite short period. Thus, the access to the wireless internet is a better way for them to get any information of which they are in great need .For instance, a businessman who is going to another city to participate in a project conference, sitting in the waiting room in the railway station, and he is anxious about if there is a train he can take to go back the next day due to the uncertainty on how long the meeting will cost him. If it is available for him to exploit wireless net, he will soon acquire the schedule of the railway and other information which is also helpful for him like the hotels near the place where the conference is held. So improving the access to the Internet can be of great significance for people.

Furthermore, the government should invest more money on improving access to the Internet in universities to make it more efficient for both the faculty and students. For example, we can set up more places where students can pay for their all sorts of fees through internet at any time. In this way, students do not need to wait for a long queue to take charge of the fees. Also, it can release many faculties to some other positions on which need more persons to work. Hence, the efficiency in the university will be upgrated a lot due to the more access to the internet in campus.

Admittedly, the public transportation also need to be well progressed in term of the traffic jam everyday. However, the government can make relevant regulations to improve the transportation. For instance, we can confine the drive of individual cars one day in terms of their car number and it is a way for free.

To sum up, as what has been clarified above, I maintain that the government should invest more money on improving the access to the internet, rather than the public transportation.

51航海UID: 2738581

17# by19900610hnyt

谢谢鼓励，我会努力~

51航海UID: 2738581

19# jbc88

恩 你说的很对，我自己也觉得我的论断过多了，例子应该在好好充实天才一下，哈哈，这样也就不用担心超时了，每次都超时，囧啊，

51航海UID: 2738581

21# jbc88

https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1047996&extra=page%3D1%26amp%3Bfilter%3Dtype%26amp%3Btypeid%3D280&page=57

51航海UID: 2738581

3 月16日   08 5 16北美
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:; M
Telephone has greater influence on people's lives than TV.

Nowadays people in growing number have realized the significant influence which telephone and TV have brought. Some individuals hold the view that telephone has exerted more impact to people than TV. From my perspective, I agree with this statement that the influence which telephones have resulted in is greater than TV.

Initially, telephones have made people’s life more convenient than before. When telephones have not been invented, the approaches which people could deliver information were just by writing a letter and post it to the receiver. It would take quite a long time for the receiver to acquire the information you wanted to let him/her know. However, When Bill invented telephones in the nineteenth century ,there was a tremendous transformation in the ways of communication. People are capable of transmitting information to anyone at any time at home, as long as he/she posseses a telephone. As a result of the invention of the telephones, people’s lives have become more efficient and convenient.

Furthermore, people’s life has become more colorful due to the emergence of cell phone. For one thing, according to the recent survey of the government, there are more than 3 billion people who have own a cell phone right now and eighty percent of them maintain that cell phones have made their lives more interesting and colorful compared to the time when they did not have the access to utilize cell phones. For another, take my experience for example, I can use my cell phone not only to tell my family about my situation recently, but to listen to the radio and watch TV. So a cell phone can take place many other facilities. That absolutely leads to a splendid life to people.

Nevertheless, TV has influenced people a lot in term of its instant news and entertainment programs. However, with the development of economy, we can also watch TV by cell phones and enjoy the similar interest TV can bring about.

To sum up, as what has been mentioned above, I allege that Telephone has greater influence on people's lives than TV due to the convenience and the colorful life it has brought to people.

358 words

lain0119UID: 2695504

Nowadays people in growing number have realized the significant influence which telephone and TV have brought. Some individuals hold the view that telephone has exerted more impact to people than TV. From my perspective, I agree with this statement that the influence which telephones have resulted in is greater than TV(这句话和上句话有点重复了,显得有点啰嗦).

initially, telephones have made people’s life more convenient than before. When telephones have not been invented, the approaches which people could deliver information were just by writing a letter and post it to the receiver. It would take quite a long time for the receiver to acquire(acquire有点不合适，这是指的通过努力获得，用receive可能好点） the information you wanted to let him/her know. However, When Bill invented telephones in the nineteenth century ,there was a tremendous transformation in the ways of communication. People are capable of transmitting information to anyone at any time at home, as long as he/she posseses a telephone. As a result of the invention of the telephones（直接as a result更简洁）, people’s lives have become more efficient and convenient.

Furthermore, people’s life has become more colorful due to the emergence of cell phone（跑题了。。。题目是telephone，not cell phone，这两者应该还是有区别的吧？！要是真没得区别请告诉我~）. For one thing, according to the recent survey of the government, there are more than 3 billion people who have own a cell phone right now and eighty percent of them maintain（maintain的用法也怪怪的= =） that cell phones have made their lives more interesting and colorful compared to the time when they did not have the access to utilize cell phones. For another, take my experience for example, I can use my cell phone not only to tell my family about my situation recently, but to listen to the radio and watch TV. So a cell phone can take place many other facilities. That absolutely leads to a splendid life to people.

Nevertheless, TV has influenced people a lot in term of its instant news and entertainment programs. However, with the development of economy（不是经济的增长，而应该是科学的进步）, we can also watch TV by cell phones and enjoy the similar interest TV can bring about.

To sum up, as what has been mentioned above, I allege that Telephone has greater influence on people's lives than TV due to the convenience and the colorful life it has brought to people.  
怎么说呢~题目认为电话比电视带来更大影响，那么就要有一个比得过程。比如说第一个理由写电话使生活更方便，那么最好写下电视在改善人们便利方面没起什么作用；同样的，你的让步段写得应该还坚决一点，最好要写成手机可以比电视让人们的生活更多彩，而不仅仅是是similar~
句子写得很顺~不过有的词要斟酌一下~
以上来自挑剔的我= =

51航海UID: 2738581

25# lain0119
谢谢赐教~

51航海UID: 2738581

3 17 作文
Nowadays，there is a heated debate with sharply soaring volume on whether university students should take basic science courses no matter what they are in favor of. Some individuals hold the view that all the college students ought to select basic science courses. From my perspective, I suggest that university students should take courses in terms of their interest, rather than be forced to take basic science courses, which they do not favor.

Initially, students should schedule their courses according to their interest and major.
If all university students are forced to take basic science courses, it will result in some negative phenomenon to the students who show no interest in these sorts of courses. For one thing, since the basic science courses are not selected by the students themselves out of their own minds, most of them will not try their best in the course and they even would like to take other courses they are keen on, rather than attend in these basic science courses. For example, in my university, all the students let alone our major, we all have to take math courses when we are freshmen. A large number of students skip the course due to their interest in other field of courses. For another, for some diligent students whose major are literature or art, it will be a burden for them to take basic science courses, due to their demanding assignment in their major classes and the weakness in these science courses compared to students whose major are science and technology. So it is not very appropriate for all university students to take basic science courses, regardless of their field of concentration.

Moreover, it will bring extra teaching burden to the faculties if all university students take basic science courses. For instance, in my university, the level of students in basic science courses of different majors can be quite distinct. Thus, it will increase the pressure of the teachers if they want all the students to be well acquired what they have conveyed to them. Professors have to prepare materials and exams with varying degrees of difficulty for students in different majors. We can imagine how complicated the work will be!

It is widely acknowledged that basic science courses play a crucial role in university education, especially for those who major in science and technology. However, for those students whose enthusiasm is art and literature, it will be already adequate if they acquire the basic science knowledge through TV or internet in their daily life.

To sum up, as what has been concerned above, hardly can I agree with the statement that all university students, regardless of their field of concentration, should take basic science courses due to the negative effects on their study and the pressure to the faculties which it will bring.

51航海UID: 2738581

28# by19900610hnyt
谢谢呵呵每次向你学习~

lain0119UID: 2695504

Nowadays，there is a heated debate with sharply soaring volume on whether university students should take basic science courses no matter what they are in favor of. Some individuals hold the view that all the college students ought to select basic science courses. From my perspective, I suggest that university students should take courses in terms of their interest, rather than be forced to take basic science courses, which they do not favor(这个定语从句有点武断了,毕竟有的童鞋的兴趣就是basic science courses,把 do not 改称might not吧~lz：怒，你直接说最后一句话就可以了，前面唧唧歪歪个啥）

Initially, students should schedule their courses according to their interest and major.
If all university students are forced to take basic science courses, it will result in some negative phenomenon to the students who show no interest in these sorts of courses（phenomenon后面接to有点中式了，要不用 negative impacts on 或直接用定语从句呢？！）. For one thing, since the basic science courses are not selected by the students themselves out of their own minds, most of them will not try their best in the course and they even（这个even很诡异。。。） would like to take other courses they are keen on, rather than attend in these basic science courses. For example, in my university, all the students let alone our major（including our major）, we all have to take math（万恶的高数！！！） courses when we are freshmen. A large number of students skip the course due to their interest in other field of courses（最好改成因为他们不喜欢数学）. For another, for some diligent students whose major are literature or art, it will be a burden for them to take basic science courses, due to their demanding assignment in their major classes and the weakness in these science courses compared to students whose major are science and technology. So it is not very appropriate for all university students to take basic science courses, regardless of their field of concentration.

Moreover, it will bring extra teaching burden to the faculties if all university students take basic science courses. For instance, in my university, the level of students in basic science courses of different majors can be quite distinct. Thus, it will increase the pressure of the teachers if they want all the students to be well acquired what they have conveyed to them. Professors have to prepare materials and exams with varying degrees of difficulty for students in different majors. We can imagine how complicated the work will be!(个人觉得最好在作文里不要用感叹句，有点口语化了，用it is hardly to imagine 怎么样呢？！

(加个连接词，admittedly)It is widely acknowledged that basic science courses play a crucial role in university education, especially for those who major in science and technology. However, for those students whose enthusiasm is art and literature, it will be already adequate if they acquire the basic science knowledge through TV or internet in their daily life.

To sum up, as what has been concerned above, hardly can I agree with the statement that all university students, regardless of their field of concentration, should take basic science courses due to the negative effects on their study and the pressure to the faculties which it will bring（最后的定语从句也怪怪的，可能删去好点~）.

这篇写得没什么问题哈~词和逻辑都挺顺的~