【Big Fish】3月10日Issue144-By gaobao

gaobaoayu123UID: 2740997

TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."

*a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
WORDS: 436
TIME: 00:45:00
DATE: 2010/3/10 22:36:11

"We thrive on negative criticism which is fond to write and read," said by a critic. However, I do not think he is a real critic; for he is just write paper for live a better life. I do not completely agree with the speaker's assertion which is overlooks the importance of critics to give society the lasting value.

Admittedly, many great art works are underestimated in their time this has more or less relative with the critics. Many great artists' thought is far beyond the contemporary people，which made them solitary and misunderstood by others, even the critics, can not find the value in those art works. Vincent Van Gogh, for instance, the famous Dutch artist who became a leader in the development of expressionism in painting, failed to find an appreciative audience during his lifetime. No one find his talent in his lifetime and critics depreciated his great works as waste papers. Sometimes, the great value created by the great artists neglected by the critics.

However, only through artists can not give society anything of lasting value, because if no one understands the value of the great works they are nonsense. Critics are the bridge connect the society to the value created by artists. The works of Van Gogh is a good example, without the critics appreciation, may be even there is still no one knows him, how can he bring the lasting value to the society. Art works need to be evaluate in order to bring values to the world. Thus, we can not leave the critics. Because, the critic itself art.


The duty of a critic is to find and protect the value of the art works. The animation Ratatouille described a relationship between a critic and a chef. The top chef's motto 'everyone can cook' once attacked drastically by the most famous critic in France. At the end of the movie, that critic understood the meaning of that motto and write: It is mean that not everyone can become great artist, but great artist can come from anywhere. The world often unkind to new talent, the responsibility to us is to protect them; even it is truly a risk. The words written by he shows us clearly the responsibility and the burden on critics. They are undoubtedly played a significant role in giving the lasting values to society.

In conclusion, not only artist, but the combine of artist and critic can give society something of lasting value. We can not overlook the significance of each of them; the artist create lasting value and the critic bring them to us.

  

cloudwind-greUID: 2462220

1# gaobaoayu123

"We thrive on negative criticism which is fond to write and read," said by a critic. However, I do not think he is a real critic; for he is just write paper for live a better life. I do not completely agree with the speaker's assertion which is overlooks the importance of critics to give society the lasting value. 这个句好像有语法错误我想改成 I do not completely agree with the speaker's assretion, which overlooks the importance of critics, people who gives society the lasting value.

Admittedly, many great art works are underestimated in their time. tThis has is more or less relative with the critics. Many great artists' thought is far beyond the contemporary people，which made them solitary and misunderstood by others, even the critics, can not find the value in those art works. Vincent Van Gogh, for instance, the famous Dutch artist who became a leader in the development of expressionism in painting, failed to find an appreciative audience during his lifetime. No one find his talent in his lifetime and critics depreciated his great works as waste papers. Sometimes, the great value created by the great artists neglected by the critics. 这个文章你的论点在第一段给出了,就是spearker说得不对,评论家也有用,但在这里你把评论家批了一通,后面两段对赞美评论家.观点相反了.

However, only through artists can not give society anything of lasting value,(这句话也有语法问题,只有通过艺术家不能给社会价值...我想改成 Lasting valus can not be created only by artists会好些) because if no one understands the value of the great works they are nonsense. Critics are the bridge connect the society to the value created by artists. The works of Van Gogh is a good example, without the critics appreciation, may be even there is still no one knows him, how can he bring the lasting value to the society. Art works need to be evaluate in order to bring values to the world. Thus, we can not leave the critics. Because, the critic itself art.上面用了van gogh 是说明那群不称职的评论家neglect了它的作品,下面这里马上用说是评论家让van gogh出名的.我想至少要换个例子吧.


The duty of a critic is to find and protect the value of the art works. The animation Ratatouille described a relationship between a critic and a chef. The top chef's motto 'everyone can cook' once attacked drastically by the most famous critic in France. At the end of the movie, that critic understood the meaning of that motto and write: It is mean that not everyone can become great artist, but great artist can come from anywhere. The world often unkind to new talent, the responsibility to us is to protect them; even it is truly a risk. The words written by he shows us clearly the responsibility and the burden on critics. They are undoubtedly played a significant role in giving the lasting values to society. 你为了论证critic should find and protect value of the art works 就用了一个例子,这个例子的评论只有一句话, 这个例子中一些话如 the world often unkind......risk都不是在说评论家的.

In conclusion, not only artist, but the combine (一般not only but also前面和后面的对象不重复,建议后面不要combine 就critics就够了) of artist and critic can give society something of lasting value. We can not overlook the significance of each of them; the artist create lasting value and the critic bring them to us.



楼主要学习的东西不少,最重要的是每一段都要紧扣主题,怎样评论也要好好学学,一个例子是不够的.