issue50 老师在外工作 有详细提纲 求拍~~~

starshaneUID: 2616355

TOPIC: ISSUE50 - "In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all faculty should be required to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach."
WORDS: 361
TIME: 00:45:00
DATE: 2010/3/16 9:23:15

总起：指出作者观点太绝对，这个问题应该按学科来分别讨论
1，社会科学的老师应该在相关职业工作。因为社会包含了复杂人际互动，单靠课堂讲解是不够的，而学生通常没有那么多机会实践，于是老师的实际经历可以作为很好的教材，学生不仅学理论也了解实践中存在的各种可能。

2，但自然科学老师没必要在外工作。自然科学的领域相对于社会科学变量较少，较为稳定，历史上许多牛人是在学校或实验室里出成果的。

3，老师过多的社会工作反而会减少他们在教学上的时间精力而引起教学质量下降。有的老师可能非常喜欢赚外快而故意忽视教学，有的老师可能根本就不想在社会上工作。这两种情况都会减少老师在教学上的注意力而导致质量下降。

本文最大缺陷可能是分类太笼统，还有很多field比如art, literature, computer and internet technology等讨论不到，确实也很难讨论……

Some people accused that the instruction given by teachers who have little experience working outside the academic world could not sufficiently equip students for future career challenges, thus all faculty should work in relevant professions to their courses in order to give better instruction. This perception may be contingent on subjects concerned. For social science, teachers should have relevant work experience; while for engineering and arts, it is neither necessary nor feasible to impel teachers to work outside.

Teachers in social science should spend time working in relevant professions in order to keep in pace with the developing social trend and methods. Some knowledge in social science could not be attained from the lectures in the class because the subject of social science is the society, which is filled with complicated interaction between individuals and groups, and is expanding rapidly in an all round way.
Somehow students in college may not have the chance to learn that knowledge before they actually go into specific careers, therefore teachers should take the responsibility to show some practical experience in relevant professions.
It would be most ideal that teachers of public administration have experience working in public sector, and that teachers of community work have really served the community. Take myself experience as example, my professor in Organizational Theory was the former secretary-general of the national ministry of examination. His lectures in class were mainly about his actual experience in the public organization and were highly credible and precious. We learned not only theories but practice and possible incidents as well. Only by actually working in social department can teachers really qualified to give correct, realistic and practical instruction to students.

However, as for science and engineering, which features precise operation and application in a controlled environment, the necessity for teachers’ relevant working experience diminished. Equations and assumptions, machines and devices, the subject of pure science is much more deadly stable than that of social science, and there are less variables and uncertainties in the scientific context than in the dynamic society as well. Look in retrospect, most great scientist and Nobel winners in physical science had devoted much their time in university, laboratory or undisturbed cloisters rather than doing various social works. Prestigious universities are home to great scientists, like Cambridge is to Newton and James Maxwell, Princeton is to John Nash which provide an ideal environment for scholars’ abstruse researches so that they can give better instructions to students in physical science.


Furthermore, contrary to the speaker's statement, teacher's working outside the academia may distract them from academic study and laboratory research and reduce the quality of their instructions, especially when the requirement becomes compulsory. Some teachers may be so interested by the profit in doing part-time jobs that they confound their major teaching task with the business and deliberately shift their energy from teaching to working outside. Some other teachers do not feel like working outside the academic world at all, which is exactly the reason they choose to teach in university. If teachers were forced to work under either precondition, it will result in the deterioration of teaching quality and detrimental effect on students. With little concentration on their research and interaction with students, professors could hardly improve their teaching qualities and make greater scientific contribution.


In sum, due to the distinct features of each discipline, it will be too arbitrary to require all faculty members to spend time working outside the academic world. Sufficient knowledge in relevant professions may be most satisfactory in social science, while not so significant in physical science. It should also be aware that too much compulsory working outside the university may counteract the improvement of teaching quality.

Revised version; 597

plukaUID: 2721764

1、关于分类。私以为分类要按照题目给出的具体情况推导出来。题目讨论的是外出工作。工作能获得什么？实际经验。实际经验有啥用？要看分类。——于是个人以为不应该分成社会科学自然科学，而应该分成“实际经验有用”和“实际经验没用”，即，理论派和实践派。B2中提到的纯科学自然是前者。但工科显然属于后者。类似的，文学比较属于前者，记者属于后者。这样分类比较切题。
2、关于工作与教学。从B2看，强调的多半是科学家的成就来自在学术界的研究而非职业岗位上的工作经验。这固然是事实，但是此事实与本文主题关系不大。题目讨论的是教学，不是教师本人的成就。

starshaneUID: 2616355

2# pluka


你的意见很有启发性！我也看了下北美范文，真是行文精简观点独到。综合修改了一下……发现把social science改成application science ， physcical science改成theoretical science也说得过去……缺点就是point 太多了，写得太罗嗦，考场上敲也敲不完

Some people accused that the instruction given by teachers who have little experience working outside the academic world could not sufficiently equip students for future career challenges, thus all faculty should work in relevant professions to their courses in order to give better instruction. This perception may be contingent on subjects concerned. The practical experience brought by working in relevant professions maybe helpful in application science like engineering and management, while not so relevant to theoretical studies like philosophy and physical science.  It is also noteworthy that compulsory working outside may reduce the quality of instruction teachers provide.

（It is almost necessary for teachers in certain fields to spend time working in relevant professions. Some disciplines are designed to equip students for actual application in the future. In those fields, knowledge cannot be sufficiently provided by the dull lecture in the classroom because the subjects of the course is highly related to the application in society, which is filled with complicated interaction between individuals and groups, and is developing with every passing minute. Somehow students in college may not have the chance to learn that knowledge before they actually go into specific careers, therefore teachers should take the responsibility to show some practical experience in relevant professions.
有的学科老师有必要在外面工作，因为涉及到的知识内容需要实践，而学生通常没机会实践，则老师有责任work outside。
这一段大概考场上时会删掉，罗嗦了）

Also teachers in application science working outside academia are obviously beneficial in promoting instruction quality. First, to inform students about latest career development. For instance, teacher in computer science should know the cutting-edge evolution of the booming industry so that he or she can give students information about latest development and inspire them bring innovation to the field. Second, to show students some untaught principals and real-world examples which are no where to find in textbooks. As stated above, some knowledge about society is too complicated to be written into hundreds of pages, and what students learned from the book may be totally different from the outside world. Take myself experience as example, my professor in Organizational Theory was the former secretary-general of the national ministry of examination. His lectures in class were mainly about his actual experience in the public organization and were highly credible and precious. We learned not only theories but practice and possible incidents as well. Only by actually working in relevant professions can teachers really qualified to give correct, realistic and practical instruction to students.
老师在外工作带给学生的好处也很多, 1, 带来最新的行业发展情况，2，真实的行业规则
关于这个大点，北美范文中作为了主要的论点来写，并写出了三个分论点，也是很好操作的

However, as for physical science, history, philosophy and such, which feature analysis in a controlled environment, the necessity for teachers’ relevant working experience diminished. Equations and assumptions, archives and classics, the subject of theoretical studies is much more deadly stable than that of social science, and there are less variables and uncertainties in the scientific context than in the dynamic society as well. Look in retrospect, most great scientist and thinkers had devoted much their time in university, laboratory or research institutions rather than doing various social works, aside from those institutions, there is basically no professions “outside the academia” for physicist, philosophers and such. It is better for teachers in those fields to concentrate on their research so as to improve the quality of their instructions.

大多数理论科学家是在研究环境里取得的成果，他们基本上也很难找到outside the academia的profession，所以还是专心研究才能给学生更好指导。

在北美范文中，老师working outside的个人成就也被当做的benefit,  按照这个逻辑老师not working outside取得的成就就可以算对题目的反驳呀，
也就是说老师专心在实验室工作更可能取得高的成就，给学生的教导自然更有分量

Contrary to the speaker's statement, we must be aware that teacher's working outside the academia may distract them from academic study and laboratory research and reduce the quality of their instructions, especially when the requirement becomes compulsory. Some teachers may be so interested by the profit in doing part-time jobs that they confound their major teaching task with the business and deliberately shift their energy from teaching to working outside. Some other teachers do not feel like working outside the academic world at all, which is exactly the reason they choose to teach in university. If teachers were forced to work under either precondition, it will result in the deterioration of teaching quality and detrimental effect on students. With little concentration on their research and interaction with students, professors could hardly improve their teaching qualities and make greater scientific contribution.
对题目的正面反驳我又有两点，所以我感觉我写多了…………


In sum, due to the distinct features of each discipline, it will be too arbitrary to require all faculty members to spend time working outside the academic world. Sufficient knowledge in relevant professions may be most satisfactory in application science, while not so significant in theoretical science. It should also be aware that too much compulsory working outside the university may counteract the improvement of teaching quality.

THX~

plukaUID: 2721764

关于理论学者那部分，嗯确实【老师专心在实验室工作更可能取得高的成就，给学生的教导自然更有分量】没错，不过到时候还是加上这句话，怎么也跟题目联系起来嘛~
正面反驳什么的感觉不错啊，不算多的。B1你标注为啰嗦的一段合并到B2里就空出位子来了~