[66's]异题 Argument43 de Sean

liberta.seanUID: 2700223

Purely based on questionable assumptions and dubious evidences ,the arguer draws a conclusion that in order to strength the economy of Paraterra ,the government should begin the advertising campaign and hire the current director of Bellegea's National Tourism Office as a consultant .To substantiate the conclusion ,the arguer points out that as a result of its beginning an advertising campaign , the number of foreign visitors arriving at Bellegea's main airport doubled and per capital income also increased .On face of it ,the argument appears to be persuasive
persuasive .Further contemplation ,however,reveales that the arguer fails to provide some information that should be addressed to corobertate corroborate the argument .In my point of view ,this argument suffers mainly three falws

Fristly
Firstly,the arguer fails to provide enough information to support the causal relationship between economic growth and advertising campaign. The increase of the foreign visitors at the main airport may be caused by the fact that this airport has become an switching airport for another busy airport .In addition, the government may introduce some new policies, which finally help improve the per capital income .Without ruling out these factors ,the arguer can't substantiate that the advertising campaign leads to the economic growth.

Secondly ,even though it is advertising campaign that results in ecomnomic growth, ecotourism may not be fit for Paraterra. There maybe many differences between those two cities. For exmaple ,Paraterra even don't have the basic condition to develop ecotourism，where the pollution is very serious .Even though Paraterra does has the requerment to develpo ecotourism ,it may not have a good transportation as Bellegea does ,such an airport ,which is quite necessary for a city of ecotourism.


Thirdly, even though Paraterra is fit for developing ecotourism, hiring the current director of Bellegea's National Tourism Office as a consultant can't guarantee that its advertising campaign will be successful .The director may know little about of Paraterra ,such as what's the advantage of Paraterra ,thus can't make a sound performance.what's more ,maybe the current director is not the one who conducted the campain last year and he is not as competent as the former one .Without ruling out this, the arguer can't make sure of that the advertising campaign will be sucessful.
In sum, the arguer fails to substantiate that hiring the current director of Bellegea will ensure the sucess of advertising campaign. To make it more convincing ,more information about the real reason of the economic growth in Bellegea and fitfulness for Paraterra to develop ecotourism should be included

soilinkinUID: 2163892

请不要用模板...谢谢...尊重别人的劳动成果...