issue144,求拍，有拍必回

xwjsarahUID: 2627269

144 "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value." *a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc. "   
As we know that criticism and scepticism of science an technology always generate the progress of humam beings .Nevertheless ,if the excessive spirit of scepticism and criticism also have the same function of art as science,it would probably impede the development of art ,at the same time ,destroy the fruits of art .So to bulid the proper affiliation between the art works and the appropriate criticism is most vital to analyse this issue which should be analysed case by case .


On the scince and technology level ,critcism is the prerequistes of any new doctrine and theory's development ,for the more criticism and scepticism they have ,the more mistakes they can avoid .For example when people were immersing the main stream doctrines of the catholic chuch that was the earth was the center of the universe ,Galileo Galilei ,an Italian mathematician ,criticised that the doctrine was fraught some fallacies ,through his observation by telescope .Although his criticism forced him to pay the expence of eight years home arrest ,he still made the titanic contribution to development of astronomy.Then the great criticism of Galilei has also sustained the theory of Copernicus and Newton.The instance has illustrated the importance of scince research.


On the arts level ,in certain respects , criticism reflecks most people's tastes and idiosyncratic visions ,so appropriate criticism could stir the artists to creat more works that be fond by people .After all ,arts are appreciated by human beings and left values for them too . In other respects ,however, subdue criticism may smash the creating passion of artists ,especially, for those novices .For instance,the rigorous criticism for those works which were made by the novices ,would destroy their confidence to create new one or even impede the path to the heaven of art.That would be a huge tragedy for society,because no one can promise that those novices wouldn't be another Van gogh and Piccoso.On the other hand ,the works of art always emerge the genuine
ideas and inspiration of arts which couldn't be changed by audiences' will
easily,if so ,the work would be lose its own values completely .In other word ,art is something about consistency to the spirit of art .



However,if a society whose members don't have any criticism for works of art ,the artists will tend to be more egregious and more extreme. As we know that ,there is no complete freedom in the word even arts ,everything must be controled by laws ,and everything must have a deadline ,if arts meet the deadline or overdue it ,which wouldn't be accepted by morality or ethos of society.For example ,in a peaceful country ,no any starvation,no any wars or proverty,a painting about extoling the jingo has been shown in the library ,does anyone accept it ?so criticism in art is necessary.


In sum ,criticism is just like the double-edge sword.It not only propels art's development and
,but also compel art's passion .So we should find a good way to combine them.

plukaUID: 2721764

我想说……LZ您写的真的是这个题目吗？还是你写了另外一题？
题目：144 "It is the artist, not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value." *a person who evaluates works of art, such as novels, films, music, paintings, etc. " 

开头：So to bulid the proper affiliation between the art works and the appropriate criticism is most vital to analyse this issue which should be analysed case by case .

结尾：In sum ,criticism is just like the double-edge sword.It not only propels art's development and,but also compel art's passion .So we should find a good way to combine them.

请看重点。题目关键点是“谁创造了永恒的价值”，但这篇文章却一直在讨论艺术与批评的关系，这就是红果果的偏题了！翻遍全文居然难以找到lasting value这个主体……艺术类确实有道题目是讨论艺术家该如何对待批评的，但这一篇，不是！

xwjsarahUID: 2627269

好吧，我再想想吧，谢谢你

xwjsarahUID: 2627269

谢谢您的提醒，我是没有好好思考。抱歉，现在改好了，你能再帮我看看吗？https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1078502&extra= 2# pluka