上周刚考过（急）

spicebai123UID: 2598265

抽到的“质疑精神”，我写了大概近600字，但写完离结束还有3分钟，于是我又开始在前面加些句子。 加到最后一个句子时我没看时间，还没加完系统就把我踢出去了。那句话成了残句。 想请问各位大侠，我的作文会不会因此而严重失分？

AdelineShenUID: 2630498

不会的，就算最后一段没写完，只要你整篇文章流畅完整，逻辑清晰，就不会有什么问题，lz好好准备笔考吧，别多想了。

草木也知愁UID: 2487572

以下是针对ISSUE的评分标准，自己去看
没有针对残句做任何特别说明
而这个评分标准是在评分过程中参照的唯一标准
结论就不用我废话了吧

GRE Scoring Guide: Present Your Perspective on an Issue
Score 6
A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue and conveys meaning skillfully. A typical paper in this category
• presents an insightful position on the issue
• develops the position with compelling reasons and/or persuasive examples
• sustains a well-focused, well-organized analysis, connecting ideas logically
• expresses ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions (i.e., grammar, usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor errors
Score 5
A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed analysis of the complexities of the issue and conveys meaning clearly. A typical paper in this category
• presents a well-considered position on the issue
• develops the position with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples
• is focused and generally well organized, connecting ideas appropriately
• expresses ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety
• demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors
Score 4
A 4 paper presents a competent analysis of the issue and conveys meaning adequately. A typical paper in this category
• presents a clear position on the issue
• develops the position on the issue with relevant reasons and/or examples
• is adequately focused and organized
• expresses ideas with reasonable clarity
• generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors
Score 3
A 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its analysis of the issue and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• is vague or limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue
• is weak in the use of relevant reasons or examples
• is poorly focused and/or poorly organized
• has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity
• contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning
Score 2
A 2 paper demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• is unclear or seriously limited in presenting or developing a position on the issue
• provides few, if any, relevant reasons or examples
• is unfocused and/or disorganized
• has serious problems in the use of language and sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
• contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning
Score 1
A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing skills. A typical paper in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the issue
• provides little or no evidence of the ability to develop an organized response
• has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
• contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence
Score 0
Off topic, in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, blank, or nonverbal
NS
Blank