- 最后登录
- 2010-6-8
- 在线时间
- 586 小时
- 寄托币
- 1246
- 声望
- 79
- 注册时间
- 2010-3-2
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1087
- UID
- 2772328

- 声望
- 79
- 寄托币
- 1246
- 注册时间
- 2010-3-2
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
发表于 2010-5-12 00:49:39
|显示全部楼层
The study of any ideas and values of a society must certainly include analyzing the appearance and behaviors of its people as a whole---because the way people look, dress and act may reflect their attitudes and interests, as the speaker mentioned, and even influence their society, to some extent--- but, this kind of study is merely a part of the overall structure. Therefore, these statements need more scrutiny.
Undoubtedly, the individual character would always be identified, more or less, by his/her appearance and behavior. For example, according to psychology, apparel color would unwittingly expose one’s personality: reserved people often choose attire in sober shade which would not flash their personality; on the contrary, bold men can be seen, most of the time, wearing bright colors which highlight their presence in the crowd. Similarly, besides the appearance, behavior is also regarded as the representative of human’s inner world. Some companies would design certain plots to test the interviewees; for example, a ball of paper would be thrown on the floor beforehand and the people who could pick up the paper ball on the ground are thought as owning a better quality---such as carefulness, accountability and so forth---than others who ignore the rubbish. Therefore, how the people look or behave would definitely reveal their potential attitude, value or belief inside. However, it is not a fixed law to judge a person through their looks and acts; some special situations would need to be considered. Some professionals like doctors, police, stewards or soldiers, must wear their uniform at their post and be trained to use “professional smile” on the face. In this case we could hardly tell what they truly felt inside. Therefore, personalities could be estimated by the dresses and actions of a person which, however, is not absolute.
Based on the above statement, generally speaking, sociologists or historians can study the ideas and values of a society through analyzing its people; however, they also need to notice that this reflection is not enough. A striking example is China, a country with a long history of ancient civilization. In ancient times, the authority had made series of strict rules of dress code for people in different classes. For example, in certain dynasties, the color of bright yellow was only be used by royalty while common people could not dress in this color; or they would get severe punishment. Therefore, contemporary scholars could find some traces to study the ancient social culture, attitude and value system through the analysis on individual various dress codes. Moreover, it is possible to identify social ideology from the apparel trend of certain times as well. Also in China, especially in the 1950s and 1960s, previous revolutions and reforms have destroyed the traditional rules root and branch. Green army uniform became a fashion so that nearly every youth would wear this kind of cloth every day, which would reveal the ideas and values of that time. Yet, things have changed when the world enter modern times. With the development of society, the relationship between nations and countries has become much more tightening and the interactions are unprecedented deeper. Sometimes, it is hard to distinguish the nationality—and even the gender-- of a person if only judging by his/her cloth. For instance, a person with a southern accent would be a northerner, while another person wearing a mini-skirt could probably be a man. From this point, I would say, only analyzing the appearance and behavior of people could be insufficient to study a society's ideas and values.
In summary, “don't judge a book by its cover” is a word of wisdom that has endured through the ages; likewise, researchers could not judge or evaluate a society only by “observing the appearance and behavior of its people” which is merely microcosm of the whole structure. |
|