【Flyer杀G】小组-6.30作业argument56

wagner1985UID: 2838595

The statement indicates us the discovery of molds of heads and hands on Kali Island explains how the Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with realistic precision. The archeologists assert that Kalinese use molds of actual bodies to finish their statues, which explains the variousness of styles. Based on this point, the statement believes the value of life-size sculptures will decrease and the miniatures will increases. However, the author has made several fallacies in logic and in deduction.

Firstly, having not found too much evidences of sculpting tools and techniques, the author asserts a conclusion that Kalinese must use molds of actual bodies. Clearly, it is inappropriate to conclude in this way, because people, even those archeologists, cannot exclude the possibility of finding the relevant evidence of other sculpture tools and techniques, which means all of the demonstration above is wrong. And body molds found also may probably not be used to sculpture. Maybe they are just made for expressing some important ideas about their feeling of human bodies.
Secondly, even if the archeologist’s implication is right, which means Kalinese’s molds of actual bodies are really related to the sculptures, the statement does not provide us more information to corroborate the use of the molds and other tools are, as they imagined, are independently used to making the life size and miniature. It is unreasonable to suppose there is no instrument to be used the both kinds of works. And as we mentioned before maybe the more tools, related with miniature as people think, will be found, then the theory will consequently be overthrown. So the persuasiveness on the rarity of evidence is not so rigorous as it seems
Thirdly, even though all of the conclusions about research, based on the discovered evidence, is definitely right, the fluctuation of market prices on those findings will not be consistent with the statement deemed, because how much an art work worth is not about its the real size and its style, realistic or abstract, but depends on the artistic values, critics’ comment, and collectors interests etc. Many sculptures are really huge but worthless when compared with Michelangelo’s David. And also many paintings do well in depicting reality but cannot catch up with Van Gough’s rare works.
In conclusion, the expectation about the prices of Kalinese sculptures is not well supported. To convince me, the researchers need to make more investigations in Kalinese civilization and find out more evidences, such as all kinds of sculptures, tools, molds etc., about their cultures, make a profounder understanding of the production of statues, make a complete analyze about the prices art works on the several factors as mentioned.

红绡UID: 2839171

1# wagner1985

The statement indicates us the discovery of molds of heads and hands on Kali Island explains how the Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with realistic precision. The archeologists assert that Kalinese use molds of actual bodies to finish their statues, which explains the variousness of styles. Based on this point, the statement believes the value of life-size sculptures will decrease and the miniatures will increases. However, the author has made several fallacies in logic and in deduction.

Firstly, having not found too much evidences of sculpting tools and techniques, the author asserts a conclusion that Kalinese must use molds of actual bodies. Clearly, it is inappropriate to conclude in this way, because people, even those archeologists, cannot exclude the possibility of finding the relevant evidence of other sculpture tools and techniques, which means all of the demonstration above is wrong. And body molds found also may probably not be used to sculpture. Maybe they are just made for expressing some important ideas about their feeling of human bodies(?).

Secondly, even if the archeologist’s implication is right, which means Kalinese’s molds of actual bodies are really related to the sculptures, the statement does not provide us more information to corroborate the use of the molds and other tools are, as they imagined, are independently used to making the life size and miniature. It is unreasonable to suppose there is no instrument to be used (on)the both kinds of works. And as we mentioned before maybe the more tools(不用the), related with miniature as people think, will be found, then the theory will consequently be overthrown. So the persuasiveness on the rarity of evidence is not so rigorous as it seems.

Thirdly, even though all of the conclusions about research, based on the discovered evidence, is definitely right, the fluctuation of market prices on those findings (这里别扭，或删掉，或换个表达方法)will not be consistent with the statement deemed, because how much an art work worth is not about （decided by）its the real size and its style, realistic or abstract, but depends on the artistic values, critics’ comment, and collectors interests etc. Many sculptures are really huge but worthless when compared with Michelangelo’s David. And also many paintings do well in depicting reality but cannot catch up with Van Gough’s rare works.

In conclusion, the expectation about the prices of Kalinese sculptures is not well supported. To convince me, the researchers need to make more investigations in Kalinese civilization and find out more evidences, such as all kinds of sculptures, tools, molds etc., about their cultures, make a profounder understanding of the production of statues, make a complete analyze about the prices art works on the several factors as mentioned.

BE，写这篇时的状态怎样？感觉没有上次的好。