- 最后登录
- 2010-9-13
- 在线时间
- 42 小时
- 寄托币
- 131
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2010-4-4
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 3
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 105
- UID
- 2792795
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 131
- 注册时间
- 2010-4-4
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 3
|
For a effective education, it is important for students to study for 11 months in school.: _6 y8 J3 Q" V) w- w/ ]
The issue of education schedule has long been in(应该是under) heated discussion. Perspectives (可数名词不光秃秃的使用,至少要加个冠词?)towards it vary from person to person . as for me , I hold the opinion that(和as for me 重复了,可以去掉) in order to study effectively ,students should stay in school for 11 months. the reasons are given in the following passage.
To start up(是to start with,表用错了,我也有个模板,个人建议就是最好保证模板里不会出错), a long-time education makes sure that students spend long time on study. the reason is simple. When students are in class, they concentrate in(注意介词的固定搭配on) learning . however if they are at home or someplace else,they are not likely to spend any more time in learning. So this kind of time table drives(个人建议,每次写完一篇文章之后,你可以自己先通篇读一下,注意一些细节,比如谓语和名词的单复数) students to spend more time on learning. what’s more, if students spend more time in obtaining knowledge, they
could learn thing more deeply .for example,8 n* t8 y5 `2 X+ L# Z
I could figure out how to solve a math problem in an hour, then if I spend 2 more hours , I can make out that the principles and. o$ ^4 k H v. f- Y3 s# N/ a! y
behind this kind of problem. hence ,we can learn more effectively if we spend more time in learning. With5 L) c \ y Y; S
those reasons , long- time education is beneficial to students’ effective learning .(这个例子放在下面是不是更加合适呢?)
Secondly, continuous education can help students have a better understanding . common sense tell us , if we keep doing a thing, no matter how hard it is , we can solve it at last. This is analogious(貌似没有这个词,你是想用analogical吧) to learning. Students could learn everything better if they keep learning successively without interruption . if their study’s pace were interrupted, they will(must) spend more time to pick it up again . take me for example again, once I met a principle that I found it hard to understand , then I spend a little time to review the theory, after a week , I understood that principle. Conversely, when I was in primary school, I asked for a week’s leave to travel , when I was back to school, I felt it hard to catch up with other students. So in these cases , I# ^" o% O! f l; \
think lasting education that can be guaranteed by the 11-months schedule does good to students’ study efficiency., N [- {( d- } k, _3 j
Last, S3 J9 Q0 h+ V# S/ u! z _
but not least, having so much time in school, student have more chances to consult their teachers and classmates. As we all know, when learning by oneself% J6 @2 F+ _+ c& a$ `3 X
, students are likely to meet with problems. if they are at school , they can ask for help as soon as they encounter the problem. If they are at home , in one case that they could go to school the next day , they could mark those questions and go to school the second day to solve them. But when they are not required to attend school, what will happen. They may forget these difficulties
and leave these knowledge unsolved. Hence ,* r6 K( F5 D- B9 K9 n! t
if they are not required to school frequently, they may accumulate a lot of questions, then forget them. Conversely , if they spend much time in school, students are able to resolve those puzzles as soon as possible, so their learning efficiency can be enhanced. These facts can give sound support for my view that 11-month time table is imperative for a effective education.; j' M- f* P9 H+ a! d
All in all, long- time education, continuous learning and chances to consult other are merits of this kind of time-arrangement. Considering those advantages , I am confident to say that for sake of (最好不单独用for 吧)learning efficiency , school should arrange this kind of time table.
呵呵,分组还没有出来,我闲着就帮你看了,改得不好勿见怪。。。我觉得你大问题没有,主要是例子的选取欠斟酌。。。。加油
请赐教For a effective education, it is important for students to study for 11 months in school.: _6 y8 J3 Q" V) w- w/ ]
The issue of education schedule has long been in(应该是under) heated discussion. Perspectives (可数名词不光秃秃的使用,至少要加个冠词?)towards it vary from person to person . as for me , I hold the opinion that(和as for me 重复了,可以去掉) in order to study effectively ,students should stay in school for 11 months. the reasons are given in the following passage.
To start up(是to start with,表用错了,我也有个模板,个人建议就是最好保证模板里不会出错), a long-time education makes sure that students spend long time on study. the reason is simple. When students are in class, they concentrate in(注意介词的固定搭配on) learning . however if they are at home or someplace else,they are not likely to spend any more time in learning. So this kind of time table drives(个人建议,每次写完一篇文章之后,你可以自己先通篇读一下,注意一些细节,比如谓语和名词的单复数) students to spend more time on learning. what’s more, if students spend more time in obtaining knowledge, they
could learn thing more deeply .for example,8 n* t8 y5 `2 X+ L# Z
I could figure out how to solve a math problem in an hour, then if I spend 2 more hours , I can make out that the principles and. o$ ^4 k H v. f- Y3 s# N/ a! y
behind this kind of problem. hence ,we can learn more effectively if we spend more time in learning. With5 L) c \ y Y; S
those reasons , long- time education is beneficial to students’ effective learning .(这个例子放在下面是不是更加合适呢?)
Secondly, continuous education can help students have a better understanding . common sense tell us , if we keep doing a thing, no matter how hard it is , we can solve it at last. This is analogious(貌似没有这个词,你是想用analogical吧) to learning. Students could learn everything better if they keep learning successively without interruption . if their study’s pace were interrupted, they will(must) spend more time to pick it up again . take me for example again, once I met a principle that I found it hard to understand , then I spend a little time to review the theory, after a week , I understood that principle. Conversely, when I was in primary school, I asked for a week’s leave to travel , when I was back to school, I felt it hard to catch up with other students. So in these cases , I# ^" o% O! f l; \
think lasting education that can be guaranteed by the 11-months schedule does good to students’ study efficiency., N [- {( d- } k, _3 j
Last, S3 J9 Q0 h+ V# S/ u! z _
but not least, having so much time in school, student have more chances to consult their teachers and classmates. As we all know, when learning by oneself% J6 @2 F+ _+ c& a$ `3 X
, students are likely to meet with problems. if they are at school , they can ask for help as soon as they encounter the problem. If they are at home , in one case that they could go to school the next day , they could mark those questions and go to school the second day to solve them. But when they are not required to attend school, what will happen. They may forget these difficulties
and leave these knowledge unsolved. Hence ,* r6 K( F5 D- B9 K9 n! t
if they are not required to school frequently, they may accumulate a lot of questions, then forget them. Conversely , if they spend much time in school, students are able to resolve those puzzles as soon as possible, so their learning efficiency can be enhanced. These facts can give sound support for my view that 11-month time table is imperative for a effective education.; j' M- f* P9 H+ a! d
All in all, long- time education, continuous learning and chances to consult other are merits of this kind of time-arrangement. Considering those advantages , I am confident to say that for sake of (最好不单独用for 吧)learning efficiency , school should arrange this kind of time table.
呵呵,分组还没有出来,我闲着就帮你看了,改得不好勿见怪。。。我觉得你大问题没有,主要是例子的选取欠斟酌。。。。加油
For a effective education, it is important for students to study for 11 months in school.: _6 y8 J3 Q" V) w- w/ ]
The issue of education schedule has long been in(应该是under) heated discussion. Perspectives (可数名词不光秃秃的使用,至少要加个冠词?)towards it vary from person to person . as for me , I hold the opinion that(和as for me 重复了,可以去掉) in order to study effectively ,students should stay in school for 11 months. the reasons are given in the following passage.
To start up(是to start with,表用错了,我也有个模板,个人建议就是最好保证模板里不会出错), a long-time education makes sure that students spend long time on study. the reason is simple. When students are in class, they concentrate in(注意介词的固定搭配on) learning . however if they are at home or someplace else,they are not likely to spend any more time in learning. So this kind of time table drives(个人建议,每次写完一篇文章之后,你可以自己先通篇读一下,注意一些细节,比如谓语和名词的单复数) students to spend more time on learning. what’s more, if students spend more time in obtaining knowledge, they
could learn thing more deeply .for example,8 n* t8 y5 `2 X+ L# Z
I could figure out how to solve a math problem in an hour, then if I spend 2 more hours , I can make out that the principles and. o$ ^4 k H v. f- Y3 s# N/ a! y
behind this kind of problem. hence ,we can learn more effectively if we spend more time in learning. With5 L) c \ y Y; S
those reasons , long- time education is beneficial to students’ effective learning .(这个例子放在下面是不是更加合适呢?)
Secondly, continuous education can help students have a better understanding . common sense tell us , if we keep doing a thing, no matter how hard it is , we can solve it at last. This is analogious(貌似没有这个词,你是想用analogical吧) to learning. Students could learn everything better if they keep learning successively without interruption . if their study’s pace were interrupted, they will(must) spend more time to pick it up again . take me for example again, once I met a principle that I found it hard to understand , then I spend a little time to review the theory, after a week , I understood that principle. Conversely, when I was in primary school, I asked for a week’s leave to travel , when I was back to school, I felt it hard to catch up with other students. So in these cases , I# ^" o% O! f l; \
think lasting education that can be guaranteed by the 11-months schedule does good to students’ study efficiency., N [- {( d- } k, _3 j
Last, S3 J9 Q0 h+ V# S/ u! z _
but not least, having so much time in school, student have more chances to consult their teachers and classmates. As we all know, when learning by oneself% J6 @2 F+ _+ c& a$ `3 X
, students are likely to meet with problems. if they are at school , they can ask for help as soon as they encounter the problem. If they are at home , in one case that they could go to school the next day , they could mark those questions and go to school the second day to solve them. But when they are not required to attend school, what will happen. They may forget these difficulties
and leave these knowledge unsolved. Hence ,* r6 K( F5 D- B9 K9 n! t
if they are not required to school frequently, they may accumulate a lot of questions, then forget them. Conversely , if they spend much time in school, students are able to resolve those puzzles as soon as possible, so their learning efficiency can be enhanced. These facts can give sound support for my view that 11-month time table is imperative for a effective education.; j' M- f* P9 H+ a! d
All in all, long- time education, continuous learning and chances to consult other are merits of this kind of time-arrangement. Considering those advantages , I am confident to say that for sake of (最好不单独用for 吧)learning efficiency , school should arrange this kind of time table.
呵呵,分组还没有出来,我闲着就帮你看了,改得不好勿见怪。。。我觉得你大问题没有,主要是例子的选取欠斟酌。。。。加油
请赐教https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthre ... p;extra=&page=2 |
|