- 最后登录
- 2012-3-25
- 在线时间
- 201 小时
- 寄托币
- 144
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-12-6
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 201
- UID
- 2735173

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 144
- 注册时间
- 2009-12-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
TOPIC: ISSUE144 - "It is the artist,not the critic,* who gives society something of lasting value."
*a person who evaluates works of art, suchas novels, films, music, paintings, etc.
When asked about who gives societysomething of lasting value, many people believe that it is the artist`scontribution not the critic`s, because the artist creates art itself and giveit new meanings. But through further discussion we can see that the work ofartist and critic are the two indispensable parts in creating the lasting valueto society.
To begin with, the artists are the ones whovoice their emotion of their lives and society out by creating art work. Art,as the most vivid and infectious form for people to express their values ofsociety and life, often not only shows us how the society is like at the moment,also plays an pioneering role of leading the new thoughts for the socialgroups. When reading the poems of Li Bai, who was a famous poet in ancientChina, we could imagine the sufferings of the people under the exploitation ofthe governing class also the undiminished struggles trying to change thesituation. Obviously, we cannot enjoy so many masterpieces and understand thesociety
through them without theseartists.
However, the critic also plays veryimportant role in helping society understand and approve the value of theartwork .As I mentioned above, art often creates new ideas and voices out thethings that no one used to say. So the artists often have to break the oldrules and explore the new areas when they are putting the new ideas intoartwork. When the society sees the new artwork, definitely everyone can havehis or her own feelings about it, no matter the feeling is strong or weak, likeor dislike. But whether the artwork have value or not and to which extent thevalue is ,can`t be judged by the common people who have no specific knowledgeof arts but only the critic who can explain and judge the artwork. A well-knownexample comes about John Keats, one of the three key figures in the secondgeneration of the Romantic Movement. During his life, his poems were notgenerally well received by the society; however, years later when the criticsreread his work and introduced his poems to the society with explanations andnotions of their value , his reputation grew and he held significant posthumousinfluence on many later poets. In short, the chance that new artwork can beviewed, accepted and even praised by the society actually comes from theintroduction made by the critic who helps the society better understands the valuesof the new artwork.
In addition, when both the society andartist find it`s hard to judge the value of coming ideas of new arts, thecritic can help making a decision by telling them some similar examples mayhave with the new art at all times and in all countries from his scientificknowledge system, or by explaining the potential meanings or functions the newart will have from the perspective of art development. This may explain whymany world famous art college masters and museum curators are all critics. Theyare no more the outsiders but the main force in art creation, helping the artistsrevising their new ideas of art development.
In conclusion, in the attempt to givesociety something of lasting value, what we need is the both of our hands thatthe artist who creates the new artwork and critic who helps introduce theartwork to the public and help artist choose the right path, rather than any ofthem. |
|