第一篇求拍issue120，期待指教

zhangHankUID: 2850119

120"So much is new and complex today that looking back for an understanding of the past provides little guidance for living in the present."

Common, or even instinct, is that we look back for guidance or solutions when we encounter problems.  As of the distinct difference between the temporary and the past, does it make sense of studying of history to look for instructions? It will be discussed case-by-case.

In the ancient time, it was meaningful to study history.  There is a Chinese old saying" The past, if not forgotten, can serve as a guide for the future."  That is because there are so many similarities between the time and the before, especially in China.  Every dynasty is almost the same except the family name of empire. So they can know the regulation of politics and economics from the study of history.  All of those political elites do understand history well. For example, the Li II of Tang dynasty is a well-known empire in the history. He learned the lesson from the perishing of Sui dynasty and adjusted the economic policies, such as sparing the expenditure of government and decreasing the taxes of peasants. So people have opportunity to thrive. After several decades the Tang owns great national strength and the people are abundant.  From this example, we can conclude that the ancient dynasty can learn a lot of knowledge, no matter politics or economy, and the reason is the basis of the dynasty is unchanged, the basis that is farmer's production.

However, since the Industrial Revolution, our society have undergone great changes, in both productive and life style. We are and will be confronted with plenty of problems unprecedented, such as the globalization and the Internet. In the globalization the capital searches for optimal configuration of production to reduce the costs.  For instance, Ford autos, in the early nineteenth century, Ford established the autos realm in Detroit. He invented the assembly-line working style and promoted the effectiveness greatly. He gave workers high wages so that they can afford cars. The workers benefits a lot from this strategy, simultaneously, Ford also gain fortunes from the increasing market. All of these are harmonic. But after several decades, with the development of transportation and communication, the capital can gain more if they make cars in undeveloped area and sold back to the US. Under the pressure of the competitors, Ford transferred his manufactory to Brazil, leaving the Detroit factory dilapidated.  And now the Brazil factory closed too. Apparently this is not the optimal development style from the view of all humans. Can these procedures be avoided? The great company transfers their factories from developed area which means high labor cost and strict environmental limit to the undeveloped area where they defray little money and can pour the pollution anywhere.  The capital is unreasonable; its only pursuit is profit. How can we assure that the globalization impelled by capital is reasonable and conducive to human beings ultimately? To deal with these problems that we never encountered in the history, we can learn little from the understanding of the past.

On the other hand, there are some core regulations of development unchanged. Parity, justice, liberty, democracy and war are continual from the history. Not only the great concepts but also some little experiences are unchanged. For example, a law of merchant recorded in the "National Word", which is a history book two thousand years ago, is that(I paraphrase) "the merchant stores leathers in summer, collects silk in winter, hoards boats in the drought time and purchases vehicles in the flood, to expected the time of scarcity of these things". I think it is still the core law in the commerce. In additional, we cannot say that we are meditating deeper than Socrates. We have a lot to learn from these ancient great thinkers.

In sum, we might face the past in the view of accepting the good and rejecting the obsolete.  So we can not only make use of experience of ancestors and at the same time avoid of being swamped in the past. When facing new problems, we need the courage to develop new method to dispose it, which is the essence of progress. We can imagine when coming up with new solution, we are also providing reference to our descendants.

江雪UID: 2790520

唐朝有叫Li II的皇帝么？我知道李渊 李世民 李治 李隆基…

zhangHankUID: 2850119

李二世

江雪UID: 2790520

完全没听说过。。。

zhangHankUID: 2850119

晕，就是李世民，说李世民和李二世不一样吗？金正日好像就叫金二

江雪UID: 2790520

晕，就是李世民，说李世民和李二世不一样吗？金正日好像就叫金二
zhangHank 发表于 2010-7-15 08:02

那你是准备把秦始皇叫做Qin I或者Qin the Great嘛？

zhangHankUID: 2850119

可以啊，对考官不都一样吗？其他的呢？提些建议吧

annkeUID: 2605122

120"So much is new and complex today that looking back for an understanding of the past provides little guidance for living in the present."

Common, or even instinct, is that这是什么新潮的东西？ We look back for guidance or solutions when we encounter problems.  As ofBecause of the distinct difference between the temporary and the past, does it make sense of studying of to study history to and look for instructions? It will should be discussed case-by-case.

In the ancient time, it was is meaningful to study history.  There is a Chinese old saying" The past, if not forgotten, can serve as a guide for the future."  That is because there are so many similarities between the time and the before previous, especially in China.  Every dynasty is almost the same except for the family name of empire. So这里的因果联系在哪？ they can know the regulation of politics and economics from the study of history.  All of those political elites do understand history well. For example, the Li IILee您搞笑吧 of Tang dynasty is a well-known empire这是帝国的意思，皇帝emperor in the history. He learned时态串了 the lesson from the perishing of Sui dynasty and adjusted the economic policies, such as sparing the expenditure of government and decreasing the taxes of peasants不好，decreasing the taxes imposed on peasants. So people have时态 opportunityies to thrive. After several decades the Tang owns这是一个表示状态的verb, seize, gain, attain, obtain, achieve…… great national strength and the people are abundant.  From this example, we can conclude that the ancient dynasty can learn a lot of knowledge, no matter politics or economy, and the reason is the basis of the dynasty is unchanged, the basis that is farmer's production.整段没有ts

However, since the Industrial Revolution, our society have undergone great changeschiglish~ have changed dramatically, in both productive? Production生产力吗？ and life style. We are and will be confronted我们不是被面对… with plenty of problems unprecedented倒换过来, such as the去掉 globalization and the Internet. In the globalization the capital searches for optimal configuration of production to reduce the costs.这例子是在讲什么啊？资本在世界范围内找最优组合是新问题吗？  For instance, Ford autos, in the early nineteenth century, Ford established the autos realm in Detroit. He invented the assembly-line working style and promoted the effectiveness greatly. He gave workers high wages so that they can afford cars. The workers benefits a lot from this strategy, simultaneously, Ford also gain fortunes from the increasing market. All of thesethese all are harmonic. But after several decades, with the development of transportation and communication, the capital can gain more if they make cars in undeveloped area and sold back to the US. Under the pressure of the competitors, Ford transferred his manufactory to Brazil, leaving the Detroit factory dilapidated.  And now the Brazil factory closed too. Apparently this is not the optimal development style from the view of all humans. Can these procedures be avoided? The great company transfers their factories from developed area which means high labor cost and strict environmental limit to the undeveloped area where they defray little money and can pour the pollution anywhere.  The capital is unreasonable; its only pursuit is profit. How can we assure that the globalization impelled by capital is reasonable and conducive to human beings ultimately? To deal with these problems that we never encountered in the history, we can learn little from the understanding of the past.看不懂了！！语法问题很多。例子是用来加强观点的，这观点在哪里？

On the other hand, there are some core regulations of development unchanged. Parity, justice, liberty, democracy and war are continual from the history. Not only the great concepts but also some little experiences are unchanged. For example, a law of merchant recorded in the "National Word", which is a history book two thousand years ago, is that(I paraphrase) "the merchant stores leathers in summer, collects silk in winter, hoards boats in the drought time and purchases vehicles in the flood, to expected the time of scarcity of these things". I think it is still the core law in the commerce. In additional, we cannot say that we are meditating deeper than Socrates. We have a lot to learn from these ancient great thinkers.

In sum, we might face the past in the view of accepting the good and rejecting the obsolete.  So we can not only make use of experience of ancestors and at the same time avoid of being swamped in the past. When facing new problems, we need the courage to develop new method to dispose it, which is the essence of progress. We can imagine when coming up with new solution, we are also providing reference to our descendants.
我是搜同主题时看到你的作文的~ 帮你看看。例子很丰富但是都没有很好组织起来。要注意一下表达的地道

zhangHankUID: 2850119

非常感谢啊，我也知道有很多地方语法有问题，表达不地道，时间来不及了啊，8.4号考试了就。顺便说一下我的意思：第二段讲古代的时候研究历史非常有帮助，因为每个朝代发展历程都有很大的相似性，第三段说现代的确遇到了新的问题，如全球化，我们无法从历史中寻求解答；第四段说有一些核心的概念古今是相通的，如经商之道。有一些基本的时代语法错误没有改就发上来了，实在不好意思