Argument188 7.15

heartleadingUID: 2850897

In the argument, the arguer attempts to convince us that kappa opioids is only for women who in pain while providing other pain medication for men. In addition, the arguer recommends reevaluating the effect of all medications on men versus wemen. To support the conclusion, the arguer cites a report of pain differs in men and women. Furthermore, the arguer also does a research to find out the difference. At first glance, the argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that it omits enough warranted evidence that should be addressed to substantiate the argument.

First, the author’s conclusion that the same pain in women is less depends on the assumption that the research results are statistically reliable. Yet, the survey only involved 28 men and 20 women, which offers no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Without a sufficiently sample, the arguer cannot confidently draw any general conclusions that the women pain less.

Second, other differences between those men and women could also explain the difference between their feelings on pain. It is entirely possible that the 20 women are younger and healthier than the 28 men, thus the result of the research unconvincing. Without ruling out the possibility, the arguer cannot conclude that the women feel much less pain than the men.

Third, the effect of kappa opioids on patients who have their wisdom teeth extracted could not be hastily generalized to all conditions where pain medication is required. Because the arguer does not point out any solid information about if other medicines are similar to kappa opioids, it is unwarranted to assume that. It is entirely possible that the kappa opioids is a special case. Therefore, the arguer cannot hastily generate to all conditions.


To sum up, the arguer fails to validate his claim that kappa opioids is only for women who in pain while providing other pain medication for men and the necessary of reevaluating the effect of all medications, because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To bolster it, the arguer would have to provide clearer details to demonstrate that the same pain in women is less. Besides, in order to access the argument, we need more concrete information concerning the relationship between kappa opioids and other drugs. Therefore, if the argument had included the given factors discussed above, it would have been more thorough and logically acceptable.

Ocean~SprayUID: 2847693

In the argument, the arguer attempts to convince us that kappa opioids is only for women who in pain while providing other pain medication for men. In addition, the arguer recommends reevaluating the effect of all medications on men versus women. To support the conclusion, the arguer cites a report of pain differs in men and women. Furthermore, the arguer also does a research to find out the difference. At first glance, the argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that it omits enough warranted evidence that should be addressed to substantiate the argument.
First, the author’s conclusion that the same pain in women is less depends （dependent）on the assumption that the research results are statistically reliable. Yet, the survey only involved 28 men and 20 women, which offers no evidence to substantiate this assumption. Without a sufficiently (sufficient)sample, the arguer cannot confidently draw any general conclusions that the women pain less.(suffer less pain. Pain名词)
Second, other differences between those men and women could also explain the difference between their feelings on pain. It is entirely possible that the 20 women are younger and healthier than the 28 men, thus the result of the research unconvincing. Without ruling out the possibility, the arguer cannot conclude that the women feel much less pain than the men.
Third, the effect of kappa opioids on patients who have their wisdom teeth extracted could not be hastily generalized to all conditions where pain medication is required. Because the arguer does not point out any solid information about if other medicines are similar to kappa opioids, it is unwarranted to assume that. It is entirely possible that the kappa opioids is a special case. Therefore, the arguer cannot hastily generate to all conditions.
To sum up, the arguer fails to validate his claim that kappa opioids is only for women who （are 或者去掉who）in pain while providing other pain medication for men and the necessary of reevaluating the effect of all medications, because the evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer maintains. To bolster it, the arguer would have to provide clearer details to demonstrate that the same（这里same，下面又less，显得语意不明） pain in women is less. Besides, in order to access the argument, we need more concrete information concerning the relationship between kappa opioids and other drugs. Therefore, if the argument had included the given factors discussed above, it would have been more thorough and logically acceptable.


点找的比较全面。但是各点力度有待加强。可以将第一段和最后一段精力用于中间三段的阐述，攻击效果更好~~