【Flyer杀G作文组】7.15-Issue69-By CC

师大菜菜UID: 2838404

69"Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development"
提纲:
1.
政府应该大力支持科学研究和发展。科学技术是第一生产力，知识就是力量。
2.
对于一些有威胁公众安全的研究,政府应该限制。 像核实验
3.
但是，总的来说，科学技术是无罪的，政府应该限制掌握它的人和使用它的目的，而不是限制科学研究本身,以便更好的利用它 。就像刀是无罪的，但是被坏人利用，就会用来杀人。克隆技术，如果用来造福人类也是好的。核实验，如果用来核发电，也是好的。
Words: 649

Time: ….
Date: 2010.7.15
Should government place few restrictions on scientific research and development? The speaker claims so. In general, I agree with the speaker’s assertion while we must realize that if some dangerous technologies be mastered by some terrorists, they will threaten the security of the society; if some controversial technologies are developed and used freely, it surely causes the chaos of social ethics. Therefore, I advocate that government should still place some restrictions on controversial scientific research and development.

In general, governments should try their best to support the development of scientific research. In other words, for most scientific researches, governments should place few restrictions. There is no denying that scientific plays an important role in the development of society.
For one thing, scientific research had been promoting the development of technology which makes people living better in nature and being able to survive in wider natural environment. In distant past, making tools and using them enable people to become lord of creation. Modern scientific research has brought three Industrial Revolutions which greatly promoted the progress of the development of society. People are able to come to air, sea, even to the moon. Therefore we can say no scientific research, no human society. For another thing, from the perspective of competition between the countries today, the ability of scientific research is an important indicator about a country’s comprehensive national strength. Deng Xiaoping, a Chinese political leader, once said ‘Science and technology are primary productive forces’. The saying is constantly used to point out that the competition between the countries has focused on competing in abilities of scientific research. Therefore, if one government places too many restrictions on scientific research will undoubtedly make its country’s development lagging behind and cannot keep pace with time.

However, we should realize that when faced some special scientific researches, governments should limit and guide them, otherwise, they may plant hidden troubles to the society. As far as I concerned, at least the following two kinds of researches should be subject to government regulation. Firstly, those researches which seriously endanger social security should be limited by government. We can see no further than nuclear test which greatly threaten public security has been forbidden in a large extent since most states signed up the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996. Without limitation, once the nuclear weapon be mastered by terrorists, the consequence will be too ghastly to contemplate. Secondly, a number of controversial technologies such as clone, degeneration, and cosmetic and so on also should be restricted by government. Although these researches do not so much dangerous as the former, if no limitation on them, abusing of them will lead to social chaos. Therefore, it is necessary to limit and guide some special scientific research in order to ensure them will not do bad to our society,

At last, science itself is innocent. What should be restricted is depend on the purposes of carrying out them and the range of people who master the result of them. Like the chopper is innocent, good people can use it to chop the vegetables while bad guys use them to kill others. If cloning technology is used to benefit human beings, it will greatly promote the development of medicine. In a not dissimilar way, nuclear energy can be used to generate electricity which can not only solve the energy problem, but also indirectly solve the environment problems which are caused by traditional methods of generating electricity. It’s not wise to totally prohibit those kinds of scientific research just because they may cause problems.

To sum up, the right purpose of scientific research is benefiting mankind. So, the ultimate purpose of government restricting scientific research also should be to ensure it can benefit mankind but doesn’t threaten society. Under this premise, the government should place as few as possible restrictions on scientific research.

还好吧,就是写得时间太长了.

candygegeUID: 2792059

Should government(s) place few restrictions on scientific research and development? The speaker claims so.(第一句是废话，去掉后，完全不影响所表达的意思。建议去掉) In general, I agree with the speaker’s assertion while we must realize that if some dangerous technologies be（were） mastered by some terrorists, they will threaten the security of the society; if some controversial technologies are(were) developed and used freely, it surely causes(should cause) the chaos of social ethics. Therefore, I advocate that (the) government should still place some restrictions on controversial scientific research and development.

In general, governments should try their best to support the development of scientific research. In other words, for most scientific researches(这里是否应该对most scientific research的范围做个界定？), governments should place few restrictions. There is no denying（denial） that scientific (scientific 是adj.) plays an important role in the development of society. For one thing, scientific research had been（为什么要用过去完成时？） promoting the development of technology which makes people living better in nature and being able to survive in wider natural environment. In distant past, making tools and using them enable people to become lord of creation（作者对scientific research的界定是什么？为什么这里要扯到古代工具的制作与使用上呢？）. Modern scientific research has brought three Industrial Revolutions which greatly promoted the progress（可以用固定短语make progress） of the development of society. People are able to come to air（come to air?come to 有到达，完成的意思。）, sea, even to the moon. Therefore we can say no scientific research, no human society（人类社会的进步不仅是技术的发展，更有体制的健全，文化的形成等，从前面的论述看来，你这里的结论过于武断了）. For another thing, from the perspective of competition between the countries today, the ability of scientific research is an important indicator about a country’s comprehensive national strength. Deng Xiaoping, a Chinese political leader, once said ‘Science and technology are primary productive forces’(双引号). The saying is constantly used to point out that the competition between the countries has focused on competing in abilities of scientific research. Therefore, if one government places too many restrictions on scientific research will undoubtedly make its country’s development lagging behind and cannot keep pace with time. （作者主要从科技进步与社会发展，并引用了名人名言来论证观点。但是，这些似乎都没有说明问题啊。首先，第一个论据的问题，我已经在段落中指出，第二个论据其实是用来支持第一个论据的，并不是证明你的观点。）

However, we should realize that when faced some special scientific researches（同上，需要对special有个界定，否则太过泛泛）, governments should limit and guide them, otherwise, they may plant hidden troubles to the society. As far as I concerned, at least the following two kinds of researches should be subject to government regulation. Firstly, those researches which seriously endanger social security should be limited by government. We can see no further than nuclear test which greatly threaten public security has been forbidden in a large extent since most states signed up the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996. Without limitation, once the nuclear weapon be mastered by terrorists, the consequence will be too ghastly to contemplate. Secondly, a number of controversial technologies such as clone, degeneration(??), and cosmetic(化妆品？这个为什么要限制？还有前面那个degeneration是什么意思呢？退化？你想要表达的是变性手术的话，可以考虑transsexual operation) and so on also should（should also） be restricted by government. (且不说后两者，单说clone，现在也没有禁止啊？你的结论有些过于绝对了)Although these researches do（are） not so much dangerous as the former, if no limitation on them, abusing of them will lead to social chaos. Therefore, it is necessary to limit and guide some special scientific research in order to ensure them will not do bad to our society.(这段有些过于绝对，我想你应该并不认为这两类研究应该被完全禁止把？但你所表述的却给人这样一种绝对的感觉)

At last, science itself is innocent. What should be restricted is depend on the purposes of carrying out them and the range of people who master the result of them. Like the chopper is innocent, good people can use it to chop the vegetables while bad guys use them to kill others. If cloning technology is used to benefit human beings, it will greatly promote the development of medicine. In a not dissimilar way, nuclear energy can be used to generate electricity which can not only solve the energy problem, but also indirectly solve the environment problems which are caused by traditional methods of generating electricity. It’s not wise to totally prohibit those kinds of scientific research just because they may cause problems.

To sum up, the right purpose of scientific research is benefiting mankind. So, the ultimate purpose of government restricting scientific research also should be to ensure it can benefit mankind but doesn’t threaten society. Under this premise, the government should place as few as possible restrictions on scientific research.

师大菜菜UID: 2838404

2# candygege
谢谢candygege同学。
祝你取得好成绩

For one thing, scientific research had been promoting the development of technology which makes people living better in nature and being able to survive in wider natural environment.  
这句用过去完成式，表示过去发展，并且以后也会发生的事情

restrict是约束限制的意思
不是一定是要禁止吧

JonathanmmUID: 2738719

lz，小小的建议，别再用nuclear weapon的例子了，评卷老师看上几百次会痛不欲生的，好不容易写一篇，说点新鲜的老师眼前不就一亮吗？更何况，这个例子也没太大说服力，核子国家已经有了，也不再试验了，无核国家或明或暗政府都拼命支持。