寄托天下
查看: 1149|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] Issue48【六人行7.27】by odie [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
2
寄托币
283
注册时间
2008-6-7
精华
0
帖子
6
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-7-27 17:39:12 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
TOPIC: ISSUE48 - "The study of history places too much emphasis on individuals. The most significant events and trends in history were made possible not by the famous few, but by groups of people whose identities have long been forgotten."
WORDS: 436          TIME: 00:47:00          DATE: 2010-7-27 17:10:24
Similar to the belief of the speaker, I agree that although heros have played important roles in the advancement of the history, the work by the unknown ordinary around us is always the fundamental force behind the progress of the society. We shall be careful not to overemphasize the importance of individuals' work for the following two reasons.
First of all, an undue emphasis on the role of individuals in history may be an obstacle in promoting the awareness of people to take up their responsibility for the society. The exaggerated stories of heroes may unfairly attribute the progress in history to the efforts of several individuals, which is actually made possible thanks to the contributions by millions of unknown people. Therefore, we are not in the right position in getting common people at the modern society to obtain the initiative to actively working for the overall betterment of a whole society and  facilitate the progressing of historical events. My opinion is that the emphasis on common people in history is especially important in schools, so that children will feel proud to be one indispensable part of the history, and will get themselves better prepared to contribute to the society.
Second, I am afraid that too much emphasis on individuals will encourage blind worship of heroes, which may be taken advantage of by dictatorship. Unfortunately, we have seen enough cases of this sort in the 20th Century. The start of WWII is coupled with the rise of dictatorship in Germany and Japan, where the two dictators, Adolf Hitler and the Japanese emperor, got immensely revered at home as the hero of the nation's history. Sadly, the down with Nazis gave rise to the up with communism dictatorship, as a result of putting the merits of the victory of the war to a single man in the country. In the Soviet Union, it is Joseph Stalin, who was accused of abuse of power and even genocide after his death; in China, it is Mao Zedong, who was later believed to be responsible for the destructive Cultural Revolution; in North Korean, it is Kim Il Sung, who was globally regarded as the father of a totalitarian nation. If the great job done by millions of common people have been fully acknowledged, as in the US or UK, the people may have every reason to protect their right to govern the nation, and the power of the ruler may get tightly checked and balanced.
As a conclusion, over-emphasis on historical heroes is unjustified and harmful. We shall divert our attention from the shining heroes to the common man and women around us, who are indeed building the society and making the history.
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
122
注册时间
2010-7-23
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2010-7-27 20:32:57 |只看该作者
killtheg发短消息
加为好友
killtheg 当前在线

UID2862114 帖子10 精华0 积分30 寄托币46  声望0  阅读权限10 在线时间18 小时 注册时间2010-7-24 最后登录2010-7-27   
新手上路



帖子10 精华0 寄托币46  声望0  注册时间2010-7-24  沙发
发表于 27 分钟前 | 只看该作者 Similar to the belief of the speaker, I agree that although heros还是与最后一段的heroes统一吧 have played important roles in the advancement of the history, the work by the unknown ordinary around us is always the fundamental force behind the progress of the society. We shall be careful not to overemphasize the importance of individuals' work for the following two reasons.
First of all, an undue emphasis on the role of individuals in history may be an obstacle in promoting the awareness of people to take up their responsibility for the society. The exaggerated stories of heroes may unfairly attribute the progress in history to the efforts of several individuals, which is actually made possible thanks to the contributions by millions of unknown people. Therefore, we are not in the right position in getting common people at the modern society to obtain the initiative to actively working for the overall betterment of a whole society and  facilitate the progressing of historical events. My opinion is that the emphasis on common people in history is especially important in schools对历史上大众的重视在学校很重要?, so that children will feel proud to be one indispensable part of the history, and will get themselves better prepared to contribute to the society. ??你的意思是说孩子因为是大众的一员而骄傲然后就对社会做贡献?不符合逻辑吧
Second, I am afraid that too much emphasis on individuals will encourage blind worship of heroes, which may be taken advantage of by dictatorship利用专政么?google没这个用法诶. Unfortunately, we have seen enough cases of this sort in the 20th Century. The start of WWII is coupled with the rise of dictatorship in Germany and Japan, where the two dictators, Adolf Hitler and the Japanese emperor, got immensely revered at home as the hero of the nation's history主语是两个人吧,单复数也改改吧;OF改IN. Sadly, the down with Nazis gave rise to二者没有因果关系 the up with communism dictatorship, as a result of putting the merits of the victory of the war to a single man in the country. In the Soviet Union, it is Joseph Stalin, who was accused of abuseABUSING of power and even genocide介个是名词诶 after his death; in China, it is Mao Zedong, who was later believed to be responsible for the destructive Cultural Revolution; in North Korean, it is Kim Il Sung, who was globally regarded as the father of a totalitarian nation.例子多而重复,没必要 If the great job done by millions of common people have been fully acknowledged, as in the US or UK, the people may have every每一个原因?不明白 reason to protect their right to govern the nation, and the power of the ruler may get tightly checked and balanced.
As a conclusion, over-emphasis on historical heroes is unjustified and harmful. We shall divert our attention from the shining heroes to the common manMEN and women around us, who are indeed building the society and making the history.
例子纯叙述部分太多,不如单分析一个,着重加长句子的长度不如加强逻辑分析,T考语言,G考逻辑,改的不好,见谅
d把文章改错了~改成你的了贴在我的帖子下面,我就只好让原来定给你改的同学帮我了呵呵。给你转过来的,不明白的颜色去我那看呵呵
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1129621&Echo
为了梦想,努力!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
0
寄托币
317
注册时间
2010-7-24
精华
0
帖子
3
板凳
发表于 2010-7-27 20:38:53 |只看该作者
。。。。。。非俺本意,sorry,sorry

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
2
寄托币
283
注册时间
2008-6-7
精华
0
帖子
6
地板
发表于 2010-7-27 22:23:25 |只看该作者
3# killtheg
木事儿木事儿 还是谢谢你呢~ 哈哈

使用道具 举报

RE: Issue48【六人行7.27】by odie [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Issue48【六人行7.27】by odie
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1129613-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部