- 最后登录
- 2010-8-15
- 在线时间
- 49 小时
- 寄托币
- 64
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-27
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 42
- UID
- 2864798

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 64
- 注册时间
- 2010-7-27
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
经过简单修该,不知道水平如何?请各位帮忙看看,不胜感激。
Issue 121 the responsiblities to save endanged species
The speaker asserts that many ancient extinctions of species is motivated by natural processes instead of human processes ,and it is accessible to predict that subsidizing public resources to save the endangered species is unjustifiable .I concede that the
speaker is on the correct side of thrifty societal sources allocating ,because saving the species which are on the margin of extinction is a so long-term and costly task that the effort and times spared to it is seemingly imponderable
.However ,the speaker overlooks the significance of a harmonious relationship between human and other species and overstate the restrictions of finance and human resource on proceeding of this project. Frederick
Marryat, British novelist said "you never known what you can do if you try".
Admittedly, ecological environment changes and various abilities of the adaptation of species to the changes trigger the ups and downs of amount of species, just as the Darwinian theory "Natural Selection". While the
actualities are far more complicated than that we presume. By increasingly sophisticated means of exploration ,we arrive at a finding that the rate of species loss is unprecedentedly higher than any human history. Habitat destruction,
overkill, introducing species,
and secondary extensions have been ironically described as "Evil Quartet". Furthermore,
if we reasonably extend this argument to ecological level,
we had to accentuate the significance of a harmoniously cooperative relationship between human beings and other species. One cannot exist without assistance from nature .Only though processes of conquering nature,
utilize nature and respect nature, can the soul be strengthened, vision cleared, ambition inspired, and success achieved.
The second compelling argument against speaker' assertion is that saving the endangered species couldn't be regard as a burden but an opportunities to stimulate job growth and economic prosperity. As the speaker’ pessimistic assertion that
a great deal of human resource will be urgently ask for, a large numbers of jobs concerning the project will spontaneously arise in this period. In addition, reinforcing the industry and economy relating to environmental conservation is feasible and practical way to maintain the patronage to achieve it. In other words,
if we attach sufficient long-term consideration and evolutionary insight ,it is tempting to be opposite to this arbitrary statement.
The third argument, and the one I find most persuasive, is an appeal to logic emotion. The effort we contribute to protecting ecological preservation is not only because of definite purpose of protecting our survival environment but a clear symbol of mutually beneficial charity. Thus, it is a morally corrective to cultivate the concern that we should get along with nature in harmony and initiate a environmental friendly life style. The standard
of countries’ ecological preservation concern will be credited as an objective indicator mirroring the spiritual level of this country.
In sum ,the speaker' assertion that it is unjustifiable to provide the patronage and human resource to protect endangered species is vulnerable, due to the ignorance of a harmonious relationship between human and other species ,the lack of concern of potential positive effects . |
|