issue212 我们怎样才可以不择手段呢

tracyrongyiUID: 2842378

TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."
如果这个目标是值得的，那么达到目标的任何手段都是可以的。
前半句分析
值得——何谓值得，对于同一件事worthy的标准，不同的人不同的理解。
出国读书，为的是追求理想追求学术上更高的成就，那么付出的代价都是值得的。所以图书馆整夜不熄灯，起早贪黑的生活对他们而言都是值得，甚至是值得骄傲的。
对于同样一件事，有些人就觉得他们不切实际，崇洋媚外，特别是对发展中国家去发达国家，他们认为这个目标太遥不可及，还不如好好找份工作来的踏实
同样是值得，恐怖袭击者认为用少数几个人的生命来震撼整个世界是值得的，可以让他们的声音被全世界所重视。
而大多数人认为这是不值得甚至是令人鄙视的行为。

以上两例的区别在于社会价值观是否认为值得。

那社会大环境的认可标准又是什么呢？

不违反moralðics， 没有给社会造成动荡。那么就是值得的，就可以用任何手段去实现它，前提是任何手段都confine to the moral and ethnic standards.（刚刚改人家的文章，发觉了一个显而易见的思维漏洞，any means显然是有问题的，就比如考试作弊，大环境下没有任何问题，但不代表就可以用作弊的手段）而且凡事确实应该竭尽全力去实现。
反之，如果社会舆论认为是不值得的，那么必须要采取可行的手段来完成这个目标。必要时也可能否掉这个目标。这就是为什么internation whales commission上的scandal必须被揭露出来的原因。

结论，这个目标如果值得，任何手段都可以。前提是，社会大环境认可它的价值，认为它值得。


TOPIC: ISSUE212 - "If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it is justifiable."

It is not an easy task to claim the worthiness of one goal. Different people may have different attitudes and evaluations towards the same thing, and thus, the "if...then" statement needs a thorough and systematical consideration.

In China, what people rarely saw in the past is becoming a popular phenomenon, that is the exodus of Chinese students exuding abroad. Some seniors claim it's unwise and is a waste of time and money, some even disprize them, describe them as brats with no pragmatism, patriotism but escapism. However, the scene of lucubration in libraries is not rare, especially with these students as heroes and heroines. Getting up at six everyday to guarantee a seat in the carol, and then begins their whole day with a bumpy and busy schedule. IELTS, TOFEL and GRE, which may seem hurdles at the beginning cost their perspiration, but that’s worthy since they are marching forward their aspiration by clearing these obstacles step by step. Thus, personal ideology determines the value of his or her goal, ignoring the others eulogy or critique.

Terrorism is another instance which aptly illustrates the standard of worthiness. Terrorists view terrorism itself valuable and impressive by sacrificing lives of several individuals to bombast the whole world, so as to make their voices being heard, which may bears sufficient significance to them. However, most ordinary people, like you and me, condemn such disastrous behavior, which are not only irresponsible to lives but interrupt the peace and stability people cherished for a long time, without claiming its unworthiness.

What's the difference between the two examples above? Have you figure out the standard of worthiness? Personally speaking, it depends on social ethics and morality. If it does not counter to regulations, rules and laws set by our society, the master have all vagaries to realize his goal and he should try every means to achieve it. Whereas one's goal can be accomplished by fermenting social unrest, threatening others' rights, or other vandalism, it can only helplessly face its aftermath: being absolutely cut off and forbidden. The exposure of Japan's bribery in the IWC (International Whales Commission), is a good way to enunciate this. Shrouded by scientific research, Japan actually hunting and killing whales aiming at commercial use. They even bribe officials of small countries at IWC for pros of such massacre. However proper their excuses seem to be, it violates morality and merits a deep punch.
  
Further, as I just put it, one should try every means to attain his or her dream as long as it's confined to social standards. For instance, the great author of two thousand miles under the sea, Verne, who had tried 16 presses to sell his writing, but all failed. He deplored and even set one foot into the fires when his wife discovered and saved him. Then, he spurred up and came across his headhunter, who is quite appreciated at his novels, at his 17th try. But any means and methods toward one's mecca should also have limitations, the word "any" cannot be reckless and unscrupulous, instead, they are bondaged and restricted in a moral range. Say, had Japan harbored a reasonabe statement to kill whales, the beauties and bucks are noble ways that deserved our applause? Absolutly not!

Thus, if you have made a goal, the first thing you need to do is evaluate its properties, to testify whether it conforms to social morality and ethics. And then, use every method and all your energy to achieve this goal.

红色是自己标注的 单词老是拼的有问题 提醒自己用的
怎样能把文章写长呢 这500出头感觉不大够啊
听说700多字的才4分 那我不又是3-3.5的炮灰了

怎么样才能把文章写顺呢 前段时间感觉自己写的还没什么chenglish，现在越来越觉得表达有问题，估计是练少了
文章现在来写 一会贴过来

nijiaqinUID: 2856025

呵呵，首先感谢你点评我的文章。虽然你没有直接留下你的链接，我还是找来了。也许以后你可以把链接留在你对别人文章的点评后面，这样人家回拍也会方便一点。
其实你不是第一个人指出我的文章跑题了，这也是我最近苦恼的地方之一。其实最后一段我想表达的意思是：既然某个目标的价值是会随着时间而变化的，那么“只要目标是有价值的”这句话就是一个伪命题，从而题目的前提就是错误的。当然这么去想的话是有点远了，估计考试的时候应该还是要选择更明显的切入点。
至于你提到的字数问题，我觉得字数只是文章的一个载体，太少的话肯定不能把意思表达完全，但也肯定不是越多越好的。我们都不是native speaker,除了某些真正的大牛，一味追求高字数或许会暴露我们句型储备不足的缺点，毕竟肚子里就那么点货，翻来覆去的用，字数越多越看的出是在重复。另外700多字才4分的也有可能是他的A发挥不好，而不一定是他的I得了低分，作为中国学生我觉得起码我还是要站在力争A得高分的前提下再去拼I，两者的难度不是一个数量级的……另外45分钟即使抄700多字对我来说估计都不是那么容易的，何况写文章总是要有一点思考的时间吧，自以为打字水平虽然不算特别好，但也还过得去了……
鄙人水平有限，先说这么多了，大家共同努力吧

tracyrongyiUID: 2842378

哦 下次会注意放链接的 那我这篇的问题可以pp吗
嗯 明白你的意思 你可以直白的说啊 正是因为我要论证你是个伪命题，所以我要提出worthiness会随时间变化而变化，外国人不会像我们这样一步一步的思考，他们需要点名很多东西。
字数问题，多谢你的鼓励和建议，我看我是时间看看a了 还没正式写过，只是分析了一遍
什么范文的也还没看呢 就怕看多了会有套路思维出现 2# nijiaqin

tracyrongyiUID: 2842378

没人改 我自己顶

前面的例子举得太挫了点 3# tracyrongyi

chnehisUID: 2860552

我觉得关键是思维要流畅才可能写到700字以上，而且要加进比较详细的例子，这样的话打字速度应该不会成为制约的因素

tracyrongyiUID: 2842378

同意 思维一定要非常的 异常的 流畅 才有700字的水准 这里说的不是凑字数啊 呵呵 5# chnehis