急！！求助 ARGU一段能写多个同类型错误吗？

yq0126UID: 2760457

RT
比如说这道题
（政治经济/论断/大对比小并列）The following appeared in the letter to an editor of a Myrian newspaper.
"Under Governor Winslow's leadership over the past four years, Myria has enjoyed unprecedented prosperity. Average wage increases this year are higher than they have been at any time since the 1970's(2), the number of people who report being unemployed has decreased by 10 percent(3,4), and construction of new homes is up by one third(1,5). In contrast, over the past four years Governor Winslow's opponent, Mr. Homer, has been mayor of a city in which only a small number of new businesses(5,7) have opened(6). If Myrians want another four years like the past four years(8), they should reelect Governor Winslow(9,10)."

其中列举的工资上涨失业减少 盖新房子等 都属于不充分的证据 我能在一段说吗？

海王泪UID: 2673613

囧～ARGUMENT还专门按错误类型来写？
正常的思维方式应该是按原文推理的逻辑链，一步一步推向推论；而不是按错误类型都堆在一起

稍微引用下AW INTRO的内容：

关于段落切换问题

This means using as many or as few paragraphs as you consider appropriate for your critique—for example, creating a new paragraph when your discussion shifts to a new point of analysis.

关于顺序问题

You might want to organize your critique around the organization of the argument itself, discussing the argument line by line. Or you might want to first point out a central questionable assumption and then move on to discuss related flaws in the argument's line of reasoning.

楼主，建议你详细阅读一下ETS的官方文件AW INTRO···

yq0126UID: 2760457

2# 海王泪 恩 回去好好看一下 那再请教一下 像这道题中的have been at any time since the 1970's(2), the number of people who report being unemployed has decreased by 10 percent(3,4), and construction of new homes is up by one third(1,5).这三条都是可以攻击的。但是在逻辑链中 他们地位应该是一样的 错误也是一样的 那我就说一个就好了 还是在一段中都提到？