我怎么觉得北美ISSUE112的范文跑题了

mildwaterUID: 2606507

112是这样滴：112."Some educational systems emphasize the development of students' capacity for reasoning and logical thinking, but students would benefit more from an education that also taught them to explore their own emotions."

我感觉题目是说，现在一些教育系统强调学生的理性思维和逻辑思考能力，但是如果教育能够同时教他们去感受和探索自己的情感，学生会从中学到更多。


也就是说，不是非A即B，而是有了A，再有B会更好。




但是感觉北美的文章理解成了非A即B。
看开头：The speaker asserts that education system should place less emphasis on reason and logical thinking and more emphasis on the explpration of emotions. While I concede that in certain fields students are well served by nurturing their emotions and feelings, in most academic disciplines it is by cutivating intellect rather than emotions that students master their discipline and, in turn, gian a capacity to contribute to the well-being of society.






大家讨论一下吧!

zxmintUID: 2817663

对偶话题，分开论述，并讨论两者之间关系，最后结论一般都是将两者相结合。个人见解哈

mildwaterUID: 2606507

嗯 看来还是讨论透彻就行 不用纠结于小细节？

NwkerWangUID: 2762052

北美范文跑题的文章太多了 主要是用来看遣词造句的 那书不是用来参考逻辑的

mildwaterUID: 2606507

这样。。。确实 要求一个人把400多道题说得滴水不漏也是不现实的

wendy825UID: 2891841

额，我看这个时也有同感。这篇还算正常的了。