argument169的一点疑问，教授与配偶的工作

笑会计UID: 2872606

“both male and female professors are happier living in small towns when their spouses are also employed in the same geographic area.”这句大家是怎么理解的呢？是说，接受调查的人觉得在一起比不在一起住得开心，还是在教授里，和配偶在一起的人比异地工作的人开心？
看到有提纲上说
The fact that professors are happier living in small towns might be due to other factors, but not because they are living together with their spouses. (NCR) ★★
我觉得这一个不应该拿来批吧。。。。如果拿来批，other factor是什么呢？是因为小镇漂亮吗？可是明明是说
happier when their spouses are also employed in the same geographic area，难道不住在一起时风景就不好了吗？


还有一句，Although we cannot expect all offers to be accepted or to be viewed as an ideal job offer, the money invested in this effort will clearly be well spent because, if their spouses have a chance of employment, new professors will be more likely to accept our offers.这一句他说的好严密啊。。。will be more likely，只是说更有可能会，而没说一定更会，还是提纲上说
The chairperson fails to consider many other relevant factors that may influence new professors’ decision. (I.T/sufficiency of the solution) ★★★★
他好像只是将配偶的工作作为提高吸引力的一种可能，也没有说这个一定能改变人家的决定啊。。。


自从抛弃模板，认真分析argument的逻辑思路后常常陷入迷茫。。。。希望大家解惑。。。