integrated writing TO BLINDA_777
It is stated in the passage that working in a group would definitely benefit the project(这句话在意思上有歧义~working in a group的隐藏主语是工作的人~而事实上整个项目完成情况的核查者是the company 如果从个角度出发它本身就像要benefit the project的话当然是在group里面好~诶……不知道我表达清楚了没有). While the professor in the lecture has successfully contradicts the views by pointing out several weakness in the passage.
To begin with, the professor directly questions the statement in the passage that individuals in the group can get the honor and rewards according to their work and contributions by offering some facts. First, it should be admitted that there are always a few people who don't take the responsibility in the teamwork. They usually act as the "free-rider". However, they could receive the same reward as it is for the entire group, and (这里不应该用and)they are members of the group. On the other hand, there are also other members who devote themselves in the pursuit of the better process of the group by offering some sagacious opinions and insightful ideas. Unfortunately, the recognition and rewarding seem not remember their hard work. Everything is shared by the whole group. The real contributors could not get what they deserved, let alone be "shine". Hence, the conclusion in the statement seems to be less reasonable for the lack of comprehensive consideration.
In addition, the professor raises another issue(这应该不算是another issue吧~最多算是another evidence to support 接后面) that group work turns out to be less effective and creative. Contrary to the argument in the passage that members would handle the problem quickly with the abundant resource and advantages in one group, the professor believes that it might take long for the group to arrive at the agreement to the direction of the project. Because there are various kinds of ideas and perspective in the group, so many meetings discussing about the final decision are required which might extend the time schedule(有点罗嗦了~). Further more, the influential persons in the group who are supposed to determine the directions would bring some negative impacts on it. They might simply disagree with a couple of ideas which might be very helpful and significant, and as a result, the suggestions might be dropped without elaborate discussion and consideration. Even though some members would suggest the different opinions, most of them are ignored by others. Consequently, if once (要么用if 要么用once 这两个词重复了~)the project fails, everyone in the group might take the responsibility of the failure which contradicts the demonstration in the passage that the single individual could avoid the blame. Therefore, without taking into account all factors above, the views in the passage are unwarranted.(逻辑问题~~要么把前面的without去掉 要么把后面一句话改成 the author fails to support the statement that balabalabala……)