9.29 by tp8

17308001UID: 2737541

Nowadays, globalization is increasing with an unprecedented speed as a result of the internet, which is based on the technology of computer. For the sake of improving the economy and the development of science, almost all countries devote a great deal of money to develop computer science. I fundamentally agree that it is a must to invest money on computer technology, however, the broad assertion that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology is in conflict with my opinion considering a myriad of other emergent and influential things.

Admitedly there are many adventages if the country has advanced computer technology. First of all, the citizen of the country have acess to a varity of resources on the internet including knowledge, entertainment. For example people can surf the internet easily to chat with friends far away. Scientists can search information through electronic databases on the internet which is very efficient and convenient. Some students may even study on line what they need is just sit in front of the computer. So I conceive that it is very significant for the government to spend money developing computer technology.

However, it is too hasty to conclude that we should spend as much money as possible on developing computer technologies with respect to other more emergent , significant problems as well as a limited resources. For example, there are still many people who are suffering from hunger, staravation as well as serous disease, compared with computer technology they are more emergent and vital. If the people in a country are suffering or even dying from hunger, is it meaningful for the government to develop computer technology. What’s more if the disease like SARS cannot be solved properly in a country, how can the country prosperous.

In addition, computer technology is closely related to other fields of science including math, physics,linguistics and so forth, is it possible for the country to gain advanced computer technology if the government only spend money on developing computer technology without investing in other fields? Besides, life science and social science is never less important than computer science, without which the country will lag even far behind.

In general, I hold that the government should spend money
on developing computer technology on the prerequest that people’s basic living conditions have been tailored. Additonally, other fields are never less important, what the government should do is to strike a balance between different fields and enjoy the limited resources to the fullest.

grandyangUID: 2730087

Nowadays, globalization is increasing with an unprecedented speed as a result of the internet, which is based on the technology of computer. For the sake of improving the economy and the development of science, almost all countries devote a great deal of money to develop computer science. I fundamentally agree that it is a must to invest money on computer technology, however, the broad assertion that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology is in conflict with my opinion considering a myriad of other emergent and influential things.
# F9 [0 C, {: S, X8 A; K: F0 z
; ?2 R4 e. i* ]Admitedly（Admittedly） there are many adventages（advantages） if the country has advanced computer technology. First of all, the citizen of the country have acess（access） to a varity（variety） of resources on the internet including knowledge, entertainment. For example people can surf the internet easily to chat with friends far away. Scientists can search information through electronic databases on the internet which is very efficient and convenient. Some students may even study on line what they need is just sit in front of the computer. So I conceive that it is very significant for the government to spend money （on）developing computer technology.+ S7 @7 {! y! A( r; U

* o" c' I# F5 c, U3 |! wHowever, it is too hasty to conclude that we should spend as much money as possible on developing computer technologies with respect to other more emergent ,(逗号换成and好些吧) significant problems as well as a limited resources. For example, there are still many people who are suffering from hunger, staravation（starvation） as well as serous disease, compared with computer technology they（指代不明确，到底是指people呢还是problems，建议将they改成those problems） are more emergent and vital. If the people in a country are suffering or even dying from hunger, is it meaningful for the government to develop computer technology. What’s more if the disease like SARS cannot be solved properly in a country, how can the country （be）prosperous.
  b" T5 I) g* R, l. ^% ^: Y; q
: M9 V& d$ \( u9 ~In addition, computer technology is closely related to other fields of science including math, physics,linguistics and so forth, is it possible for the country to gain advanced computer technology if the government only spend money on developing computer technology without investing in other fields? Besides, life science and social science is never less important than computer science, without which the country will lag even far behind.
8 C$ X! V5 `% A * Y* T6 U/ n" D; T# H/ K3 e* _
In general, I hold that the government should spend money ; P0 S  b. H5 K9 c
on developing computer technology on the prerequest（prerequisite） that people’s basic living conditions have been tailored. Additonally（Additionally）, other fields are never less important, what the government should do is to strike a balance between different fields and enjoy the limited resources to the fullest.

里面有许多单词的拼写错误，写完后可以放到word用拼写检查功能找出拼写错误并改正，减少拼写错误会提高成绩的
如果有修改不妥的地方请多多包涵，本人水平有限，如果有值得商榷的地方，请直接给我发QQ邮件。grandyang@qq.com

17308001UID: 2737541

Which is more important for students to learn, concept and ideas or facts, different people may hold quite different ideas towards the issue, some hold that concept and ideas are the generation of the facts, which feathers a wider application, so they think concept and ideas are more important, however the other holds a totally opposite opinion, For my part, it is irrational to compare them as they are not exclusive, they complement each other, they are equally important.

Initially, ideas and concept are the summary of  our predecessor's experiences, which is abstract but is widely used. For example , the law  of gravitation which is concluded by newton from the fact that apple always fall down to the ground rather than up to the sky. It is generally acknowledged that it is very abstract for us to learn the concept of gravitation as neither can we see it nor can we touch it. But it has been widely used to illuminate many physical phenomenon.

However, the facts is what really happen in our daily life, they are never less important.some facts are easy to understand as the result of the ideas and concepts, while others are difficult to understand or cannot not be explained by current ideas and concept, and still needs to be carefully studied. They serve as the basis of concept and ideas, without which hardly can we reach any concept and ideas. One apt example of this point is that newton reach the law of gravitation through observing the fall of apple from trees and still newton obtain the three fundamental law of motion through investigating the motion of objects, adding a bit of imagination.
  
As far as I am concerned, they promote each other, facts can help the learning and understanding of concept and ideas, while the concept and ideas can be used to explain unknown facts. For example we can use the law of gravitation to explain the effects of gravity toward objects, while the falling down of the apple can help us understand the law of  gravitation  and the existing of gravity.

Ultimately, I want to say they are not  especially exclusive as the generation of ideas and concept are the long time experiences of studying facts and can be better understood by learning facts , on the other hand the ideas and concepts can be used to further explain the unknown facts and phenomenon thus promoting the understanding of facts. So I conceive that they are equally important considering that they complement each other.

米爆爆UID: 2892134

已改。

S酱UID: 2883188

4# 17308001

已改~~写的很好

17308001UID: 2737541

it is generally acknowledged that  televisions and movies ,which occupy almost half  of our leisure time,  are playing an important role in our leisure time. The question that whether televisions and movies make it hard for parents to control their children has aroused a heated debate. For my part, I fundamentally agree that  televisions and movies make it hard for parents to control their children accordingly, I conceive that it is better for parents to guide their children toward rightness rather than try to control them.

Initially, television and movie really have served as the catalyst that make it more difficult for parents to control their children considering the positive effects they bring to children. Nowadays there really exist some violent and blue movies that tailor to the children's curiosity have awful impacts on the development of children. Many children become hostile and violent toward others as a result of the violent movies.Juvenile delinquency that result from the blue and violent movies has risen greatly since the invention of movies. So there is no denying that television and movie have result in negative effects toward children and make it hard for parents to control children.

However, we can never disapprove the advantages of television and movie considering a wide range of enjoyments and easy access to information brought by them. It has become a habit for us to open the tv to gain the latest information and entertainment as soon as we come back home. In addition, there are some educational programs which is of great help for the education of small children which can not only impart them more knowledge but also promote their creative thinking.So TV and movie are beneficial with regard to these merits.

As far as I am concerned, children should have access to knowledgeable and movie or the other outside things to become more knowledgeable and more socialized, though they may have some drawbacks and what qualified parents should do is to guide them  toward the right direction and enable them to judge from right and wrong rather than try to control them Parents cannot always follow their children to supervise or control them, one day they have to live on themselves and be responsible for themselves.

Ultimately,  though drawbacks exist, TV and movie actually bring us lots of happiness and convenience.   For the well being of the children as a whole I recommend that all parents try to improve their children's judgements toward right and wrong.

米爆爆UID: 2892134

看完你的我就觉得我走题了。
囧。。。。

米爆爆UID: 2892134

不错不错。比我好多了。

17308001UID: 2737541

环境 The only effective way to encourage energy conservation is by increasing prices of gasoline and electricity. 070811



The development of technology and economics bring people lots of benefits,  while cause some problems either, especially energy shortage as a result of the great energy consumption. How to save energy has become a heated argument. Some hold that increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is the only way to conserve energy, while others perceive a different idea. Personally, I conceive that there are many ways to solve the problem and increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is not necessarily the most effective way.

Initially, increasing the price of gasoline and electricity might have a positive impact on energy saving with regard to people's willingness to save money. It is easy to envision that when the price of  electricity is very low, people would pay little attention on saving energy, however when the price is relatively high, people begin to focus on saving electricity to save   money. In addition, many people especially women may choose to take buses to go to work as they think it would cost too much money if they take their private car, when the price of gasoline is enhanced.

However, it is too hasty to conclude that increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is the only effective way considering that it just decrease the use of energy in a superficial way. For my part, the most effective way is to transmit  a energy-saving sense which needs better education of the school and government .Hardly will energy be wasted. provided that everyone has a strong sense of saving energy. So I think the fundamental and most effective way is let people know the energy is limited nowadays and the sense of saving energy is indispensable and significant for the sustainable development of human being.

As discussed above, increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is just a superficial and passively accepted way by people. The most effective way is to impart people the knowledge and sense of saving energy which call for the concerted efforts of  governments , schools as well as people as a whole.

adou89UID: 2902228

ment of technology and economics bring people lots of benefits, . while Meanwhile, they cause some problems either (as well), especially energy shortage as a result of the great energy consumption. How to save energy has become a heated argument. Some hold that increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is the only way to conserve energy, while others perceive a different idea. Personally, I conceive that there are many ways to solve the problem and increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is not necessarily the most effective way.(and前后这么用待商榷~要成分一致~~这个there be 句型很怪我重写个~也不知道对不对~~，I conceive that there are many ways to solve the problem, which makes the increasing price of gasoline and electricity not a necessity )
6 N+ K2 l, @! a" x1 p
Initially, increasing the price of gasoline and electricity might have a positive impact on energy saving with regard to people's willingness to save money. It is easy to envision that when the price of  electricity electricity is very low, people would pay little attention on to savesaving energy, .however However, when the price is relatively high, people begin to focus on saving electricity to save   money. In addition, many people, especially women, may choose to take buses to go to work as they think it would cost too much money if they take their private car, when the price of gasoline is enhanced.

However, it is too hasty to conclude that increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is the only effective way considering that it just decrease the use of energy in a superficial way. For my part, the most effective way is to transmit  a energy-saving sense which needs better well(无比较物) education of the school and government .Hardly will energy be wasted. provided （介个时态没看太懂）that everyone has a strong sense of saving energy. So I think the fundamental and most effective way is let letting people know the energy is limited nowadays and the sense of saving energy is indispensable and significant for the sustainable development of human being.

As discussed above, increasing the price of gasoline and electricity is just a superficial and passively accepted way by people. The most effective way is to impart people the knowledge and sense of saving energy which call for the concerted efforts of  governments , schools as well as people as a whole.

感觉理由还是少了点~~第一段冗长了些~~把字数补到2.3段比较好~~~水平也有限~~改的也不知道对不~~嘿嘿~~权限不够发不了附件~~要是看不清我群里给你传word版~~

17308001UID: 2737541

provided是假如的意思

17308001UID: 2737541

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising is a waste of time and money because customers already know what they want.（预测题） 07.12.08 CN





I fundamentally agree with assertion that advertising is a waste of time and money considering the great expense and time spent on advertising  .But my contention with the speaker involves the issue that customers already know what they want.

First and foremost, in many cases a handful of time was spent on looking at different kinds of advertisements, additionally, the customers might have to pay for the remarkable expense brought by advertisements. One apt example of this point came immediately to my mind, after a day's hard work, most of the people will open their TV set ,having a look at some TV series ,thus getting relaxed . However the constant appearance of some dull and funny advertisements is really
boring and significantly reduced the time that we can spent on TV series that we want to look at .

However, there is no denying the fact that advertisements really bring us some useful information that might serve as a guide for us to make our decisions. For instance,when you are wondering where to go to have a meal with your friends, then a piece of advertisement that says a new hotpot restaurant has been just opened up , if you go there now you will get a discount. It is highly possible that we will choose to go there to have a try and it might turned out that you have made a smart choice.

As discussed above, there are many cases when we do not know what you want, the appearing of an advertisement may give us an intelligent choice with regard to the function of advertisements which basically serve as a tool to transmit information. one apt example is that when I was wondering which kind of cellphone to buy, then suddenly I thought of an advertisement about nokia N95 . I was fascinated by the strong function of the cellphone and decided to buy the cellphone.

In general, I am in favor of the claim that advertisements might waste us lots of time and money with respect to the repeatedly appearing of advertisements , but I am against the assertion that people always know what they want considering the existence of many cases that we really do not know how to choose.



Word Count: 376

米爆爆UID: 2892134

555..新家没电脑，改迟了。抱歉哈。

17308001UID: 2737541

10.12 by tp8


In the lecture, the speaker asserts that the solutions in the passage are either unsuccessful or lead to the environmental damage

Initially, the lecturer refutes the solution in the passage that building a national fence will be useful. Because young cane toad eggs  located in strains can go through fence,,additionally the water can carry the toad and their eggs to other sides of the country, thus making the solution less effective.

In addition, the writer claims that the   toads could be captured and detest by volunteers, however the speaker said that frogs in the country may  die a result of being captured either.So the second solution cannot be harnessed.

Finally, the lecturer disapproves the viewpoint that researchers can develop a disease-causing virus to control the cane toad population by saying that the reptiles and amphibians infected by the virus may migrate to America and take the virus there, causing the  infection and even dying out of native cane toads in America.

In general, the speaker refutes the solutions to the cane toad problem in the passage by saying that the solutions would be ineffective or harmful to the environment .


























15 家庭  Some people think one’s working is more important than being with one’s family. 071020

It is generally acknowledged that work which serves as the main economic resource, is very important for both a man and a woman. However ,which is more important work or staying with family?someone hold that working is more important than being with one's family .Yet, I fundamentally conceive that being with one's family is more important than working.

First and foremost, the basic aim and subjective of working for a person is to earn his living as well as living happily with his or her family. We won't be delighted if we cannot be with our families though we can earn lots of money. For instance, a sailor may earn enough money to support all his family including his parents, but will their parents live a comfortable life if they have no access to see their children and have to live alone? If not, then the sailor cannot be delighted either. So it is effortless to perceive that being with our family is more significant compared with money  though we can never deny the significance of money.

In addition, family  is very profound for everyone in the realm of both mental and physical needs no matter  for male or female. As a person, we need a place to  flee from the suffering and tiredness of work as well as  gain comfort, a place which is called home. I cannot image the life if I have to be alone both eating and living. What we really need is chatting  and eating a big meal  with our families after a day's hard work.

Ultimately, a family can be a essential impetus for our work. If we have a harmony  family, then we have a solid basis and great enthusiasm for work without having to consider and worry too much ,what's more it is easier for us to have a better performance when working. There is no denying the fact that having enough time to be with our family is the prerequisite for a harmony family with respect to the less misunderstanding that might exist .

As discussed above, I totally agree with the assertion that being with our family is more important than working with regard to the physical and mental needs of a person as well as the benefits brought by staying with my family.