[u'r not alone小组]提纲作业 Issue32

Luise8891UID: 2906459

:) issue32："A school or college should pay its teachers at the same rate in all disciplines, regardless of differences in salaries for related fields in the world outside of school. For example, entry-level teachers in mathematics and in the arts should receive the same pay, even if outside of school, math specialists earn a much higher salary on average than do specialists in the arts."

Luise8891UID: 2906459

："A school or college should pay its teachers at the same rate in all disciplines, regardless of differences in salaries for related fields in the world outside of school. For example, entry-level teachers in mathematics and in the arts should receive the same pay, even if outside of school, math specialists earn a much higher salary on average than do specialists in the arts."
中文解释：一个学校或者大学应该付给所有学科的老师的薪水按同一个比率，不管相关的邻域在学校之外的收入差异。例如，初级的数学老师和艺术老师应该拿同样的薪水，即使，在校外，从事数学的人平均比艺术领域的人拿高很多的薪水。
Postion：Teachers in all different disciplines, should not be paid at the same rate.

论据：1) fairness  如果给每一个老师按同一比率来付工资，不考虑到各个领域的差异性，和老师不同的工作量是不公平的。1，如大学数学老师比艺术老师，工作量的大很多。2，大学英语教授和医学教授，后者所要掌握的知识，还有成为教授的困难的程度后者明显高于前者，如果拿一样比率的工资的话，不公平。
不公平所带来的不良影响，第一有的老师会埋怨，不会尽心尽力教学生，第二，某些的行业的人看到学校工资比市场上低这么多，打消他们当老师的积极性，优秀的人才都去市场了，严重影响学校的将来发展。3）有些老师会跳槽。
            
         2)应该考虑到市场因素。某些掌握特殊技能的人就应该拿更多的钱，这样才会显示出它的社会价值。如北大校长季羡林会古梵语，世界上没几个人懂，如果他在北大教书，和北大的某一个数学教授拿同样的工资，这很难让人接受。如果不让这些有特殊技能的老师拿更高的工资的话，那不是不珍惜人才吗？
总结：要综合考虑到公平性和市场因素，再根据这些给工资。

刘文奇UID: 2850560

issue32
"A school or college should pay its teachers at the same rate in all disciplines, regardless of differences in salaries for related fields in the world outside of school. For example, entry-level teachers in mathematics and in the arts should receive the same pay, even if outside of school, math specialists earn a much higher salary on average than do specialists in the arts."
学校或者大学应该付给所有学科老师相同的工资，不管在校外不同领域之间薪水的差异有多大。例如，入门级的数学老师和艺术老师应该拿到相同的薪水，即使在校外，数学专家比艺术专家的平均薪水高出很多。

Outline: It sounds encouraging for schools or colleges to pay their teachers at the same rate in all disciplines concerning equation, for every discipline should be considered as equally important. Nevertheless, it is impracticable to equally pay its teachers of all discipline because of difference among disciplines. Moreover, many problems will be induced by the act.
point1: the merits of equality of paying teachers’ incomes: 1) every teacher should be equally treated irrespective of his discipline.2)every discipline should be treated equally since each is important for sutdents’development.
point2: the unreality of the conduction: 1)different educational resources are consumed to be different teachers. 2)different disciplines need different time and energy to teacher better.3）different quantity of teachers in different areas.
point3: detrimental effect: 1) There will be more and more teachers in relatively easy areas, however, there will be less and less teachers in relatively difficult area. 2) teachers will prefer not to take more time and energy to disciplines which need more energy and time for teachers to teach well.