[pt60-s1-q22] Is it a hard question?

lily88888UID: 2828533

One of the most useful social conventions is money, whose universality across societies is matched only by language. Unlike language, which is rooted in an innate ability, money is an artificial, human invention. Hence, it seems probable that the invention of money occurred independently in more than one society.

The argument's conclusion is properly drawn if which one of the following is assumed?

A. Some societies have been geographically isolated enough not to have been influenced by any other society.
B. Language emerged independently in different societies at different times in human history.
C. Universal features of human society that are not inventions are rooted in innate abilities.
D. If money were not useful, it would not be so widespread.
E. No human society that adopted the convention of money has since abandoned it.

duijinxiaoziUID: 2585955

Money is an artificial, human invention. (非innate ，即“后天的“)
--------------------------------------------
invention 有 抄袭 的可能。
A

lily88888UID: 2828533

A is the answer.