置疑ETS眼看就到百人了，请斑竹声援

黑狐狸UID: 103185

请支持质疑ETS的朋友把名字发到我的邮箱中，jbxiao@sohu.com
表示你支持这次行动，您可以是已经考过的，准备考的，或者看了我们的公开信后对我们的行动表示支持的，都希望您能支持一下。希望是正式的名字，不是网名。谢谢。

此信马上就要发出了，请大家越早发信越好。。。

非常感谢silverbell提供英文翻译。

To whom with ETS it may concern，

Your announcement of the writing test scores for the GRE on March 15 in Mainland China has stirred up huge reverberations among test takers in Mainland China. That is mainly because, according to our survey, that the average GRE writing scores for March 15 lowered up to 0.5-1.0, compared with the scores from the similar paper-based test last November. As is known to all, the results from tests given by ETS are widely accepted by universities for its fairness as the most important reason. We think that lacking sufficient proof of vast discrepancy in writing abilities of GRE takers of the two tests，their average scores should be basically consistent, thus to reflect the fairness of the test. The unusual discrepancy between the writing scores of the two tests, however, has directly thrown the March-15 GRE takers into an unfairly disadvantageous position in university admission. Furthermore, we have other queries about the rating standard and methods of the GRE Writing test. We believe answers to those queries will promote a more effective participation in GRE test.


Therefore, we would like to request：
1）to make public the statistic data of the GRE writing test scores from November and March tests;
2）to clarify the vast discrepancy to test takers should there be any existing in the scores of the two tests;
3）to make public the statistic data of the scores from computer-administrated GRE and paper-based GRE tests for fairness, and to clarify discrepancy should there be any, for we believe that computer-administrated GRE and paper-based GRE tests have different impacts on test scores. 4）to illustrate with examples of the circumstances under which the charge of articles identical in contents is applied.

Your quick response would be very much appreciated.

GRE takers in Mainland China
June 12, 2003

angeikimUID: 4857

好的;)

Sunflower~~UID: 78436

support!

黑狐狸UID: 103185

我发现支持的都是我认识的斑竹，不认识的斑竹几乎没有一个支持的，这次置疑不是我自己的事情，我是代表寄托出面的，希望寄托的斑竹支持一下。。

angeikimUID: 4857

。。。
支持再支持:cool:

可惜我这里没人认识的是考G的。。

amorzUID: 1

应该已经超过90人了。大家多多支持一下吧！

alan_903UID: 110685

我推一下

beckyyeeUID: 8330

我支持！

把我的名字也加进去吧，我三月考了的。三月的percentile的算法很不公平，把我们和10月机考以及11月的混在一起算的，我作文5分，结果percentile才65% ：（

beckyyeeUID: 8330

我的成绩单上写明了percentile是从10的机考算起的，所以质疑信里是不是应该加上我写的这条? 难度系数有太大的差别，三月的percentile就只应该算三月的！