- 最后登录
- 2015-1-11
- 在线时间
- 70 小时
- 寄托币
- 48
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2010-3-9
- 阅读权限
- 10
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 33
- UID
- 2777405

- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 48
- 注册时间
- 2010-3-9
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
发表于 2010-11-13 11:24:32
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 ct7lute 于 2010-11-13 11:26 编辑
Nowadays, with the trend of globalization, the distances among countries become smaller and smaller. Newspapers and magazines, as the major media which can provide abundant information to the public, also contain more introductions (content/information) of foreign countries. When one wants to know about a foreign country, these media are common resources. But when asking are newspapers and magazines the best way? I don’t think so. Following are some reasons.
Firstly, I think to achieve (get) information on the Internet is more useful (effective). Internet service has spread to many families and companies all over the world in the past several years. Diverse databases, encyclopedias have been well established and available online for free. The contents often contain almost all aspects of a country. But on newspapers and magazines, the information is usually fragmental and it often takes us so much time to search relative articles. For example, you heard (hear of) the name “Luxemburg”, a small country in Western Europe, and you want to know something about it. If you search it on the Internet (certain website), such as Wikipedia, it will only take several clicks to get what you want: the geography, economics, tourism, culture… all aspects of this country. There are also some linkages to other websites when you need some detail (detailed) information. However, when you resort to newspapers and magazines, the task may be messy and inefficient. They do provide much information when we do reading. But to choose them as a knowledge source is not the best method.
Secondly, going to that country is the most direct and efficient way to learn about a foreign country. You may hear and see it on TV and the Internet or read in books for a hundred times. But I think they are not better than experiencing it. As we know that, much information in media, no matter books, newspapers, or TV and the Internet, has been more or less modified positively or negatively (reported positively or negatively/modified in a positive or negative direction). Since it may be difficult for us to possess the ability of judgment (right judgment) in front of these things, the best way is to go there and see it by yourself. You can live with the people there, you can observe their customs, eat their food, and visit their places of interest. Thus you can have a deep impression of this country and learn much about it, in fact, more than any other way I think. However, this way is probably a luxury for many people due to its high cost.
All in all, the information on newspapers and magazines are not the best resources for learning about a foreign country. However, they do offer us many stories and photos. To read them at your leisure time can widen your horizon. It must be beneficial to your knowledge about the world.
1. 我感觉用得不太地道的词,或者有问题的词,在括号里给出了自己的意见,不一定很好哈。
2. 结尾似乎不是总结全段内容,而是做了一个让步,承认newspapers and magazines还是有一定效用的。但是用All in all打头的话,会被认为是全文总结,那就应该涉及Internet和trip,这才是文章主要内容吧。 |
|