- 最后登录
- 2012-9-2
- 在线时间
- 28 小时
- 寄托币
- 121
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-14
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 81
- UID
- 2711759
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 121
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-14
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
本帖最后由 gdsxyzyl 于 2010-12-12 19:08 编辑
Issue3 Outlines:
A. Consider the author's assertion that a country must ask the whole students, before entering college, to receive the same curriculum, not to allow the local to decide its academic courses. Of course, the claim that the whole students receive the same curriculum has its meaning in some parts. Firstly, it is convenient to compare the fruits of educating in different zones. Secondly, the nationwide policies is relatively easy and rapid to take effect. Thirdly, it has its advantages to reach the same target.
B. However, receiving the same curriculum in the whole nation, has its biggest shortage of ignoring the local differences. Considering different peoples, distinct status and targets of development, and kinds of other restrictions, the government in a nation, especially like Russia, Canada, China and America, should not require all its students to study the same curriculum ,but permit the local to determine its courses to offer.
A13 outlines:
The chief executive believes that it is a good investment to buy the rights of producing a video game based on Peter Wood's book "squirrel Power".
Reasons:First,the three previous books written by Wood and a movie based his maiden book yields big profits.Second,by the popular characters and story line,the company can cut off some cost.
First,although Wood's last three books brought great profits,we can not predict that his book "Squirrel Power" will also be loved by the readers.Maybe,the readers are tired of his writing styles;the book is suited to some minimum community,like only children.However,the chief neglects these vital informention,which makes his reasoning is biased.
Second,the chief says the company can reduce cost ,but he does not figure out how much,maybe very little.If they put too much into it and can not predict the profits,the investment is abviously an unwise disicion.
A34 Outlines:
A. In the argument, the author conclude the result that consuming lots of dairy products may have negative effect on preventing osteoporosis based on a long-term study. From the statement, we know little about the exact study. Without the explanation of the study, it is incredible to receive the conclusion.
B. To begin with, the author does not reveal any detail about the study, including the sample size and observed people's physic conditions. We know the sample size is a important fact for a study, which is represented by a large number in the argument. As the former statement, osteoporosis, a disease in which the bones weaken
significantly with age. So,the fact age may play a vital role in the study,which the author should explain.
C. Secondly, with hypothesis that the study works well, there are other questions about the reasoning. Obviously, the study shows a diet rich in dairy products increase the risk of bone fractures, as a symptom of osteoporosis. Therefore, the author says a diet abandunt in dairy products could result in osteoporosis. Undoubtedly, bone fracture is different from osteoporosis. The author's reasoning commits the fallacy of faulty analogy.
D.In sum, the author should describe the study in detail and give more credible reasoning, Or he/she does not convince us the result.
沙发! |
|