Issue160 第一次成文，真是累人啊

yzl_1988UID: 2372248

Issue 160:The mostessential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistentlycommitted to particular principles and objectives. Any leader who is quicklyand easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
翻译：一个执行能力强的领导者最基本的素质就是能够持续保持忠于一个特定的原则或者目标。任何容易快速被大众意见变化所动摇的领导者必将一无所获。

=====================================

坚持原则很重要，但是要成为一个优秀的（good? better?）领导，我们也需要倾听大众的意见。

为什么坚持原则很重要？

首先，一个大事是不可能很快做完的，如果领导者在原则上持续变动，那么很多事情必定要半途而废。其次，能够坚持原则和目标的领导者就像是团队的眼睛和脑袋，看到一个方向就不再移动，直到达到目标。

为什么要倾听大众的意见？

首先，领导者和大众是作为一个团队出现的，而且团队的效率在很大程度上取决于大众的工作效率。其次，大众意见的变化在很大程度上能够反映当前方向策略的问题，如果在大众意见明显变化的时候，领导者依然一意孤行，那么结果很可能是领导者无人可以领导，这时更谈不上完成目标了。

如何结合？

最终极的领导素质就是结合大众意见和原有目标原则。在大众意见变化和原则目标不相矛盾时，我们能够很容易达到两者的结合。但是如何在两者相互矛盾时舍弃一方才是做一个领导者最难的地方。罗斯福总统的新政就是结合大众意见和原有目标原则的一个最佳例子，在新政中，罗斯福总统并没有坚持所有自由经济的旧信条，而是结合大众的意见，不断规范自由经济，并由此将美国拉出大萧条的深渊。

总结

要成为一个有执行能力领导，我们不仅要能够坚持目标和原则，我们更要倾听大众的意见变化，只有在坚持目标原则的框架下紧密结合大众意见，我们才能。。。

=====================================

Howto become an effective leader? Is it only about committing to particularprinciples and objectives? Or are leaders who are quickly and easily influencedby shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little? No, in my opinion, aneffective leader must be the one who can combine particular principles andobjectives with shifts in popular opinions.
Firstof all, stick to certain principles and objectives are essential. On the onehand, with principles and objectives changing quickly and easily, many thingswill be half done, giving the whole team a busy time but little accomplishments.On the other hand, leaders are eyes and head for the whole team. By committingto particular principles and objectives, a leader will give his team a certaindirection and guide them to their destination.
Secondly,it is important to be influenced by shifts in popular opinions. As we all know,a team is from by leaders and the public, and the efficiency of a team isgreatly depending on the efficiency of the public. If by catering popularopinions will accelerate the efficiency of his team, why should not aneffective leader. That is why leaders of a great many companies compromise to strikes,and why Ford doubled salary for its workers in 1914 and profit even more in thefollowing years. Also, nobody is perfect, popular opinions can often revealdefects of current leader. By listening to popular opinions, a leader can findmistakes he make thus improve himself to a better leader.
Thirdly, how to combine principleswith public opinions is the most important question for an effective leader. Itis easy to combine these two when there are no contradictions, but when facing difficultiesleader must make their own choice. Whether they will chose to change principlesand objectives like President Roosevelt did in his New Deal, which drove the Americanout of the Great Depression; or they will chose to change the popular opinionsas Martin Luther King did in his speeches, which fight its own way against racialdiscrimination. Only when they make the choice correct, they can be regarded asan effective leader.
Particularprinciples and objectives are like directions we towards; public opinionsreflect the velocity we progress. Only if we combine the two togetherperfectly, we can be regarded as an effective leader.



=====================================
花我整一个早上，这边参考，那边查词的，最后终于凑成来这390词不到的短文，羞愧啊。希望以后能够顺利些。

lz80521UID: 2756488

楼主思路很清晰。

个人感觉，词汇多点同义替换，文章会增色不少。

MercutioUID: 2971390

嗯，感觉作者总体的思路很好，中间似乎有一些小问题。
Para2. giving the whole team a busy time but little accomplishments : giving的主语是什么，many things还是many things to be done这件事？建议作者换成which gives. a busy time值得商榷一下。
Para3.and the efficiency of a team isgreatly depending on 我个人觉得是不是depends on?
总体上觉得作者的Analysis少了一些，Ford, Roosevelt的例子可以展开分析一下。

对了，致楼主：我们互改把~~
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthread.php?tid=1201303&extra=

yzl_1988UID: 2372248

2# lz80521
恩，以后多注意同义词的替换。不知道等考前能积累多少同义词……

yzl_1988UID: 2372248

3# Mercutio
恩，主要是先想了好久的中文的，那两个地方的确有点不通顺。表达还是有问题啊。

yzl_1988UID: 2372248

最后又修改了下，弄出来个最终结果。
How to become an effective leader? Is it only about committing to particular principles and objectives? Or are leaders who are quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little? No, in my opinion, an effective leader must be the one who can combine particular principles and objectives with shifts in popular opinions.
First of all, sticking to certain principles and objectives are essential. On the one hand, with principles and objectives changing quickly and easily, many things will be half done, living the whole team a busy time but little accomplishments. (any good examples?) On the other hand, leaders play role of eyes and head of the team . By committing to particular principles and objectives, a leader will give his team a certain direction and guide them to their destination.
Secondly, it is important for leaders to be influenced by change in popular opinions. As we all know, a team is from ed by leaders and the public, and the efficiency of a team is greatly depends on the efficiency of the public. If by catering popular opinions will win an efficient public, thus, gain an efficent team, why should not an effective leader.
That is why leaders of a great many companies compromise to strikes, and why Ford doubled salary for its workers in 1914 and profit even more
in the following years. Also, nobody is perfect, popular opinions can often reveal defects of current leader. By listening to popular opinions, a leader can find mistakes he make thus improve himself to be a better leader.
Thirdly, how to combine principles with public opinions is the most important question for an effective leader. It is easy to combine these two when there are no contradictions, but when facing difficulties leaders must make their own choices. Whether they will chose to change principles and objectives like President Roosevelt did in his New Deal, which drove the American out of the Great Depression; or they will chose to change the popular opinions as Martin Luther King did in his speeches, which fight its own way against racial discrimination. Only when they make the right choice, can they be regarded as effective leaders.
Particular principles and objectives are like directions we towards; public opinions reflect the velocity we progress. Only if we combine the two together perfectly, can we be regarded as an effective leader.