- 最后登录
- 2004-6-12
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 601
- 声望
- 1
- 注册时间
- 2003-7-5
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 295
- UID
- 139286

- 声望
- 1
- 寄托币
- 601
- 注册时间
- 2003-7-5
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
刚写好了,全文如下:
More and more people began to agree that every aspect such as education, politics, the arts and the sciences will all benefit from the unify of the globe especially in the fields of economics and communication because more contact with each other means more information, and in this case all these aspects will benefit from it more or less, which I don’t quite agree. It is too one-sided and we should analyze this problem concretely.
In my opinion, we need to cut those aspects of society into three parts: one including the technology, economics and education aspects, one including the politics aspect and the other the arts and some traditional facets of the society.
Firstly, considering the technology, economics and education facets, it is far from beneficial of the global unify of economics and communication to them. A global unify means a smooth collaboration between countries – the collaboration in the economics field can pace up the steps of the development of economy of both sides, and similarly, the cooperation on technology is also helpful in the way of decreasing the waste in human resources and other resources and thus pave the way for a further thrive in this field. And in the education aspect, the effect is obvious. The art of teaching greatly depends on the experiences that can be absorbed from other countries or regions that are more experienced.
Secondly, from the aspects of politics, communication is a good method of solving problems too. A famous politician once said, “Economy is the foundation of politics”. If the relationship between the two countries is based on the frequent communication and smooth cooperation in economy, then these two countries will have the least possibility to have conflict, for the interest of each country is somehow involved in one another. At the same time, good communication also helps the government making decisions. The similar situation happened in other countries may give the local government a vivid reference and help it out of some roundabout ways.
But all those above don’t mean that such kind of global networks in the areas like economics and communication have no reverse influences. This can be proved from the aspect of the arts and traditional customs, the essence of which is its unique features. Just like the old saying says, “Only the national is international”, the only way those arts and traditional customs distinguish themselves is to keep those features that are out of ordinary. Though I concede that proper communication is good for their development, however, too much communication or commercialized advertisement for them would bring over bundled influences from the outside world that may destroy the original characteristics and little by little erase what the essence lies, and eventually changed the independent development of the arts and traditional customs.
To sum up, to some extent we can agree that the thriving of global networks especially in the areas of economics and communications are advantageous, at the same time we should admit that there are also a bit of unfavorable effects in it. All that we should do is to face it properly, promote the good half of it while take good control of the other. In one word, just make every effort to help developing of our society.(543) |
|