issue 4 大家看看怎么修改 写了好久憋出来的

ilwUID: 2757131

想问问在哪些方面应该去改进 继续学习 谢谢


4、"No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
According to the speaker, outsiders play a significant role of furthering the development of any research field. Although I agree that ample experience and up-to date knowledge of the outsiders may provide the researchers in a certain field a new view to speculate on the subject, research fellow’s perseverance and continuous learning are of much importance. Thus, the speaker overstates the comparative significance of the outsiders’ role.

One reason for my fundamental agreement with the speaker is that owing to the long time mutual study, researchers in a certain field obsess too much of others’ opinions and finally their views tend to be similar and they are more likely to hold a stale view, thus few of them can make real innovations, making the research cease to advance. However, the outsiders haven’t learnt much , at least not so much as the insiders, about the systemic frames of a certain field. They are more likely to find the unstable point, which the insiders take for granted, to further the research process. For example, by pointing out that every single material has its own wavelength,
historian Broglie break the conception imprison of the physicists of that era, contributing greatly to the cognizance of wave-particle duality.

Another reason why I essentially agree with the speaker is that although researchers in certain fields have collected enough dates and other materials, they lack the basic skills and thorough eyesight to find the essence that those materials reveal. For supporting evidence, one need look no further than the 18th century astrology world. The great scientist Kepler had been collecting dates of the planets for nearly ten years, finding little behind the pure numbers. By exploring the internal relation of the dates, his mathematician friend helped him to find the 3 great axioms for planet moving. Consider another example, economics had slowed down its pace after the pure theoretical analyzation, but this subject have been revitalized by the introducing of the mathematician .

Aside from the foregoing 2 reasons, however, I disagree fundamentally with the speaker. The speaker asserts that without the knowledge and experience outsiders bring, any field of study cannot achieve much progress. Can we deny that foundation and discovery in the initial development of any field is fundamental and crucial? It’s because several subjects have gone so far and so little can be found by the peers in that field that we need outsiders provide new visions and experience. Besides, several social curriculums like philosophy are so intricate and complicated that outsiders may find hard to learn the basic knowledge to understand the conceptions, let only contribute much to the subject. In addition, these subjects lack the catholic relation to other curriculum, making it even harder for outsiders to do a evolutionary work.
In sum, the statement is fundamentally correct. When a subject comes into maturity, researchers in the given field may find it as bottleneck to proceed. Under such circumstances outsiders may provide them with new visions and techniques. However, the continuous investigation is also needed for the insiders, perseverance and rigorous calculation may also help them to find the breakthroughs of their devoted subject.

ilwUID: 2757131

顶一下 哎~