寄托天下
查看: 3025|回复: 16
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[i习作temp] aw 作文贴(闲来无事请勿灌水) [复制链接]

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-2-25 17:47:24 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
作文贴
0 0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
沙发
发表于 2011-2-26 11:58:40 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 卧沙场 于 2011-2-26 12:03 编辑

周一 ISSUE 138
"Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress."
TIME: UNLIMITED    WORDS:459

Considering the well-known proverb, failure is the mother of success, no one could ignore the significance of any important mistakes in the process of human's civilization. However, the speaker apparently have overlooked some special facts and then drawn an absolute conclusion. So I partially agree with the conclusion that the importance of some failure is undenied, but to some details more accurate attention should be payed.

The history of science is almost a procedure of trial-and-error. Nearly every innovition is a new method aggregated by the previously prevailing things, in which there may be full of disadvantges and enough room to be improved. Taking the field of physics for an example: there has been a long-lived debate between the wave theory, which was brought out in the 18th century and well prooved by many experiments, and the quantum theory, which was a popular view during the beginning of 20th. Approximately each physicist was struggling to disprove one or the other. A half century later, a new theory-the string theory- was gradually formed, which was based on the work of those predecessors and was more persuasive.         

It is the explorers attitude of mistakes, but not the mistakes itselt, that actually works. In that sence, the whole achivements that we have achieved so far, should be contributed to the requisitive attitude and assiduous work of the human beings towards the hardships, incluing the setbacks and frustrations. It is always true that no truth is ever-lasting. To find out the limitation and relevence of those theories at the present time, then imitate them and transcend them, is an ideal realm, which is a feasible method to deal with disadvantges. Innumerable cases from successful paradigms have taught us movingly that it is the spirit of exploration that matters in the affaires of failing.      

Although the experience that is derived from mistakes is valueable, some tortuosity can be predicted and avoided. It is natural in our mind that we hope each case we are dealing with could go smoothly. In a great majority of affires the frustration is not irrevocable and to repeat it is both time-wasting and energy-consuming. One striking function of reviewing history is to predict the occurences in the future, including to diminish the risk of false. The happenning of emergences is something we are forced to treat, but are not volunteered to create. The knowledge presented on the books is the summoned synthesis from the lessons of our ancesters.

Whether discovery and progress would come along with mistakes depends on our attitude towards the failures that we have committed. Moreover, since many mistakes are not irrevocable and may cause great danger, it is necessary to dimishime the risk of failure by taking advantages of the knowledge and lessons form others.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
板凳
发表于 2011-3-1 10:57:59 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 卧沙场 于 2011-3-1 17:39 编辑

2011-3-1 周二  A188
WORDS 505     TIME UNLIMITED
This argument seems plausible in its reasoning, yet it is brimming with obvious logic defects. By citing a recent study involving only a limited number of 28 males and 28 females, one conclusion is brought out that this painkiller, kappa opioids, should only be prescribed for females, but not males. Moreover, this fallacious conclusion is extended with no proof to a larger field: all the effects of medications need to be reevaluated.

One overwhelming flaw of the artical is that a too limited sample, involving only 48 individuals in all, is of no chance to bring us a convincing decision. When dealing with a scientific research, under no circumstances could any scientists overlook the significence of samples in that all the following steps would be based on them. what a solution it would be if it was drawn from the improper objectives? How could a suggestion be convincing to its readers if it was even not able to convince ourselves? To make the reasoning process more academical and accurate, it seems better to redo the research involving a larger group, which is also expected to cover the geografical distribution of the population.

It seems that the arguer tends to apply the conclusion which was derived from the known experiment to a extended degree, claiming that men and women experience pain differently merely by the study of wisdom teeth. Yet this extension turns out to be a utopian exaggeration, failing to see that no persuasibe evidence is further presented. Certain that pain is a highly obscure description towards the impact of the abnormal feeling, it is highly possible that males have a higher-than-average pain threshold yet are not prone to complain, and that the reverse happens between females. That to expand the already known idea to a virginal field without supporting prooves is apt to make the analogy fallacious.

Even if the new discovery found in the experiment regarding with one kind of medicine, the kappa opioids, is acceptable, is there the very necessity to reevaluate the effects of all medicines that our medical researchers have found or created so far? The kappa opioids is only a matter of painkiller which functions in the area of pain treating. On the other hand, the theories or explainations in some other aspects, such as the placebo to pacify the nervous system or the additives to prolong the freshness of vegetables or fruits, have developed through several hundreds of years and almost nothing is questionable concerned with them. It is not qualified to state that the whole achievements that we have achieved by now need to be chanllenged barely by a short-time study.

Nothing scientific ought to be presumed with frivolous attitude. In the affairs of research, the consideration of samples, the basic foundation for the entire experiment, and the methodolical analysis, through which a reliable inference would be infered, should both be smoothing in logic and meticulous in details. To make this research trustworthy, a revised experiment subjects and a more meticulous induction is suggested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
284
注册时间
2010-12-25
精华
0
帖子
6
地板
发表于 2011-3-1 18:45:38 |只看该作者
改~周一 ISSUE 138.doc (37 KB, 下载次数: 10)

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
5
发表于 2011-3-2 22:30:03 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 卧沙场 于 2011-3-2 22:32 编辑

2011-03-02  周三 ISSUE112
WORDS:522  TIME:UNLIMITED

While no one could deny the significence of education during the growth of each individual, the topic pertaining to what kind of education is most suitable has been highly debated. The arguer states that a comprehensive education system, combining both the reasoning and the logical thinking, and the emotional exploration, is most beneficial. I completely agree with this statement in that since the situation varies all the time, it is quite necessary to learn the ability to become versatile.

Culture is a commonly shared spiritual values, by which our experience and knowledge is accumulated and descended. Education system is one of the most important channels to descend and promote our cultural identity. The development level of one country's educational system is the most telling index for the degree of its modernization. This principle has been proved for innumerable time in recent hundred years. America is the most powerful country today, with the most advanced education system and a highly educated group of civilians. While Japan is located in several small islands, the strict demands and high quality of the curriculums in its universities is world-famous.

It is commonly believed that preciseness is the very character in demand for every career, especially those vocations involved in science and technology. It is plausible to maintain strict and cautious considering that there is often a definite dividing line between the right and the wrong. Take the field of physics for an example: there has been a long-lived debate over two theories. The wave theory, which was brought out in the early 18th century, has been testified in the later several hundreds of years by countless reasonable and logical doubts. The quantum theory, which was becoming a popular view in the beginning of 20th century, depicts the world in an utterly different way. After many years of debates, some physicists have proposed the string theory, which was more feasible especially in the blindspots of the previous two ones. The process of the growth in science witnesses the powerful strength of reasoning and logic.

In addition, many modern disciplines, such as the field of art and psychology, increasingly value the exploration into peoples' emotions. Compared to the functions of science, the purpose of art is to obscure, rather than to explain our surroundings. Both the inspiration sources and output objects of art are emotions, which invite irrationality in its nature. If the educational purpose for artistic courses is to reinforce the impression of natural laws and strict thoughts, what appears on the canvas was most likely to be the equations, rather than the sceneries. Things remain the same in psychology, since the emotional thought could never be accurately predicted, the study for the research of feeling in correlation with specific background is striving.

To promote a comprehensive education system, the attention should both be paid to the reasonable and logical thought, as a conventional method for analysis, and the newly booming field of emotional exploration. Since our knowledge system is divided into detailed branches and emotions can serve as an important role for many accomplishes in arts, it is beneficial to open the gate for emotional explorations.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
122
注册时间
2010-12-25
精华
0
帖子
2
6
发表于 2011-3-4 11:29:06 |只看该作者
5# 卧沙场
While no one could deny the significance(拼写错误) of education during the growth of each individual, the topic pertaining to what kind of education is most suitable has been highly debated. The arguer states that a comprehensive education system, combining both the reasoning and the logical thinking, and the emotional exploration, is most beneficial. I completely agree with this statement in that since the situation varies all the time, it is quite necessary to learn the ability to become versatile.
Culture is a commonly shared spiritual values, by which our experience and knowledge is accumulated and descended. Education system is one of the most important channels to descend and promote our cultural identity. The development level of one country's educational system is the most telling index for the degree of its modernization. This principle has been proved for innumerable time in recent hundred years. America is the most powerful country today, with the most advanced education system and a highly educated group of civilians. While Japan is located in several small islands, the strict demands and high quality of the curriculums in its universities is world-famous. (这一整段没有扣题的感觉,没有提到CRITICAL THINKING /EMOTION EXPLORING,这一整段在阐明教育的重要性。这个题目谈论重点不是教育的“重要性”吧)
It is commonly believed that preciseness is the very character in demand for every career, especially those vocations involved in science and technology. It is plausible to maintain strict and cautious considering that there is often a definite dividing line between the right and the wrong.(明确的分界线••好句,学习了) Take the field of physics for an example: there has been a long-lived debate over two theories. The wave theory, which was brought out in the early 18th century, has been testified in the later several hundreds of years by countless reasonable and logical doubts. The quantum theory, which was becoming a popular view in the beginning of 20th century, depicts the world in an utterly different way. After many years of debates, some physicists have proposed the string theory, which was more feasible especially in the blind spots of the previous two ones. The process of the growth in science witnesses the powerful strength of reasoning and logic.(从物理史的角度去证明逻辑思考的的重要性,不错)
In addition(此段与上段并非递进关系,应该是转折关系,用HOWEVER吧), many modern disciplines, such as the field of art and psychology, increasingly value the exploration into peoples' emotions. Compared to the functions of science, the purpose of art is to(TO去掉,obscure不能做动词) obscure(为了和后面那句话平行,还是改成to wit?Art的功能··你肯定有更好的答案), rather than to explain our surroundings. Both the inspiration sources and output objects (直接用OUTPUTS,不要OBJECTS就行)of art are emotions, which invite irrationality in its nature. If the educational purpose for artistic courses is to reinforce the impression of natural laws and strict thoughts, what appears on the canvas was most likely to be the equations, rather than the sceneries. Things remain the same in psychology, since the emotional thought could never be accurately predicted, the study for the research of feeling in correlation with specific background is striving.
To promote a comprehensive education system, the attention should both be paid to the reasonable and logical thought, as a conventional method for analysis, and the newly booming field of emotional exploration. Since our knowledge system is divided into detailed branches and emotions can serve as an important role for many accomplishes in arts, it is beneficial to open the gate for emotional explorations.
总体感觉素材和好词好句积累的是比较多的,但是,文章的布局似乎不是很合理,而且思路上还不具备很强的说服力。首先,你在首段表明了支持作者的论点,然后说 “I completely agree with this statement in that since the situation varies all the time, it is quite necessary to learn the ability to become versatile.” 这句话表明了你的态度应该是倾向于情感教育要加大力度,而且似乎更加重要一些。这样,你应该采用“大正小负”的形式去论证,两段论情感,一段论理论(我个人感觉,虽然很模板化)
但是你在正文的三段里面足足用了一段来阐述教育的重要性,让人感觉怎么“这么久了还没入题啊?”。然后后面两段各自分布给逻辑思考和情感教育,而且让人感觉情感教育挺重要的,但是又不是“非常重要”的(可能是因为你原来想把两种教育完全平衡的缘故吧)
最后,你重复两者同样重要,然后说“Since our knowledge system is divided into detailed branches and emotions can serve as an important role for many accomplishes in arts, it is beneficial to open the gate for emotional explorations.”,和手段一样,只强调了情感,所以又给人感觉情感很重要。作者到底是觉得哪个重要一些呢?(所以我个人觉得最好还是强调一者然后顺带提一者比较好写一些吧)
以上只是我个人的看法,还没有涉猎大量的范文,所以目前是这样的意见,可能还误解了你的本意,如果是如此,不要见笑啊(*^__^*) 不过你的例子和语句、用词都比我好很多(其实我压根就没有例子),学习了!呵呵~ 继续加油!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
182
注册时间
2010-9-5
精华
0
帖子
1
7
发表于 2011-3-4 23:24:03 |只看该作者
While no one could deny the significance of education during the growth of each individual, the topic pertaining to what kind of education is most suitable has been highly debated. The arguer states that a comprehensive education system, combining both the reasoning and the logical thinking, and the emotional exploration, is most beneficial. I completely agree with this statement in that since the situation varies all the time, it is quite necessary to learn the ability to become versatile.

Culture is a commonly shared spiritual values, by which our experience and knowledge is accumulated and descended. Education system is one of the most important channels to descend and promote our cultural identity. The development level of one country's educational system is the most telling index for the degree of its modernization. This principle has been proved for innumerable time in recent hundred years. America is the most powerful country today, with the most advanced education system and a highly educated group of civilians. While Japan is located in several small islands, the strict demands and high quality of the curriculums in its universities is world-famous.
这段指出了culture与education的辩证关系,并引入国民性格作为佐证。本段本身写的非常精彩,但似乎与主题关系不大。。。建议

It is commonly believed that preciseness is the very character in demand for every career, especially those vocations involved in science and technology. It is plausible to maintain strict and cautious considering that there is often a definite dividing line between the right and the wrong. Take the field of physics for an example: there has been a long-lived debate over two theories. The wave theory, which was brought out in the early 18th century, has been testified in the later several hundreds of years by countless reasonable and logical doubts. The quantum theory, which was becoming a popular view in the beginning of 20th century, depicts the world in an utterly different way. After many years of debates, some physicists have proposed the string theory, which was more feasible especially in the blindspots of the previous two ones. The process of the growth in science witnesses the powerful strength of reasoning and logic.

In addition,(建议改为however) many modern disciplines, such as the field of art and psychology, increasingly value the exploration into peoples' emotions. Compared to the functions of science, the purpose of art is to obscure, rather than to explain our surroundings. (这句非常精彩,不知楼主怎么想到的,佩服佩服)Both the inspiration sources and output objects of art are emotions, which invite irrationality in its nature. If the educational purpose for artistic courses is to reinforce the impression of natural laws and strict thoughts, what appears on the canvas was most likely to be the equations, rather than the sceneries. Things remain the same in psychology, since the emotional thought could never be accurately predicted, the study for the research of feeling in correlation with specific background is striving.
上面两段分别就理性和感性角度阐述了教育的不同目的。
To promote a comprehensive education system, the attention should both be paid to the reasonable and logical thought, as a conventional method for analysis, and the newly booming field of emotional exploration. Since our knowledge system is divided into detailed branches and emotions can serve as an important role for many accomplishes in arts, it is beneficial to open the gate for emotional explorations.这段
楼主此文在遣词造句方面的功力一流,看的出总结了比较多的例子,但我想楼主应设法将例子更好的融入到文章中去,现在楼主的这些例子(比如物理史方面的那一串排比)本身都非常精彩,但与文章缺乏有效的衔接,我个人觉得一种比较省事的方法是在列出例子后用一句话照应一下段中心思想,比如在物理史那段之后加上 from which we can see….等等类似的话。
另外楼主在文章中就两方面(理性、感性)分别做了论述,但是彼此之间缺乏有效的关联,我想更重要的是指出versatile的重要性。在这方面楼主在行文时应该时刻想到中心在哪里,别且在分别论述后尽量能够做一全面的总结。
总体而言看得出楼主已经做了很多素材、句式等方面的准备了,希望再接再厉,进一步提高一下文章的论证严谨性,加油!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
8
发表于 2011-3-5 09:10:08 |只看该作者
3.4  周五 I 170
"The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general welfare of all its people."

WORDS: 540  TIME:UNLIMITED



To pursue the welfare is thought as an inalienable right for each human being, which all nations are also aiming at. Admitting the significance of the general welfare of all people, the arguer underlines that the well-being of the citizens is always of the most importance, compared with other achievements of the rulers or the progress in the fields of art or science. Apparently, this conclusion is too absolute, which fails to consider the inner relationships between the common benefits and other developments.

Great nation is often founded above the ruins, which buried the stubborn conventions as well as other frustrations in the way of advanced currents. Modern nation is defined as a synthesis combination, in which one striking function is to realize and protect the civil rights. On the other hand, to protect the realization of civil rights is a basic destination, but not the only one. To keep one nation survive, there comes some departments in charge of different and specific affaires, such as the diplomatic administration, which promises a peaceful living environment, and the military administration, which exerts an violent but ensuring influence in the time of emergency. It is definitely a one-sided view to define the nation as merely a function to govern and promote domestic affaires.

It is commonly believed as an inalienable right for people to pursue their happiness, to promote their living standard, to create the material wealth to support their family and to ensure the happiness of the group that they cherish. It is well-known that in America the civil rights of its citizens is promised by the Constitute, which was always mentioned in the ritual of presidential inauguration. One telling index for a government's achievements is the situation including the satisfaction of citizens to the current sovereigns. No one could deny that welfare is the primary demands for every citizens and the very reason to direct the longevity of one regime. Modern tax is a compulsory burden yet also a common benefit, the cooperation through which each involved turns out to be the beneficiary.

Each forms of spiritual values, including the science and art, is either direct reflection or further imagination about the surroundings, which in reverse promote the prosperity of human's lives. In this sense the speaker failed to find out the intrinsic essence in scientific or artistic progress and severed the ties between them and the benefits of common groups. There has been a long-lived debate between two theories in physics: the wave theory, which was born in 18th century, yet had been testified by innumerable experiments in the later hundred years, and the quantum theory, which was quite popular in the early 20th century. Nearly each physician was struggling the disprove one or the other. After years of assiduous work, a new theory-string theory-has been brought out and has been regarded more convincing in demonstrating the world around each of us.

Emphasis on the common welfare for a country is undoubtedly the primary and ultimate destination, yet the common welfare is never an insulated island with nothing related with the prosperity in other aspects. Actually, it was the combination of all aspects, rather than merely general welfare, that ought to be the surest indicator of a great nation.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
9
发表于 2011-3-7 21:29:57 |只看该作者
3.7 周一 I 17
"There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws."

TIME : ONE HOUR (REVIESD TIME NOT INVOLVED)    WORDS:506


While admitting the importance of respect and obeisance for the just laws, the arguer states that it is probably more important to disobey or even resist those unjust laws. Considering the fact that all functions of modern society are promised by the prestige of common justice, I agree with the opinion that all the populace ought to observe law system. However, since no definition or limitation is presented concerning the so-called unjust, it seems unreasonable to suggest a hostile or radical attitude towards it.

It is widely believed as inalienable rights for each citizen to pursue happiness, to support family by making wealth and to ensure the proper condition of those that they cherish. Promise to guarantee the civil rights and elevate social living standards is a routine ritual repeated each time in the presidential inauguration. The significance of regulations for our daily lives is self-evident, just like the role of traffic lights for the order of vehicles. One striking distinction of modern society compared with antiquity is the belief that we commonly shared, the orders that we abide with our own accords.

However, when facing the darkness, such as unfairness, never should we retain reticence. Taking the fascism for an example, before the World War Two, fascism was prevailing in Japan, German and Italy mostly. After years of deliberate preparation, fascism dictators started their invasion towards their neighbors but were condemned by the pacifists all the world. To further their daydreaming to break the world structure and promote the evil theory-fascism, the Axis Power provoked the whole world, yet to their surprise, the situation processed beyond their control shortly after the complete eruption of the war. Without the courage against evil and the endeavor to topple the tyranny, there never comes the triumph of World War Two and the new peace witnesses the power strength of human’s volition.

Since any rule has a limitation more or less, by promising interest of majority at the expense of minority, it is impossible for our law system to satisfy all citizens involved. We are likely to find us on a slippery slope towards sanctioning all types of illegal behaviors if willful rebellion according to emotional judgment towards law is permitted or recommended. It is strictly forbidden to emit toxic pollutants without further purifying steps beforehand, in that the law protects the health of nearby habitants and the intactness of ecology from being polluted. On the other hand, this regulation undoubtedly has broken the interests of chemical factories, electrical plants and other industries, for that the costs for waste treatment equipment are still a heavy burden. Authority pertaining to explaining the legal system and a further compensation for the vulnerable minority is a placebo to pacify the conflicting tension.

No one could deny that the smoothing functions of modern society are promised by the authority of legal system. Although we also cherish the spirits of resistance under tyranny, yet it is unreasonable to take willful and radical actions only if we are not in favor of specific laws.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 4

声望
10
寄托币
410
注册时间
2010-9-1
精华
0
帖子
11
10
发表于 2011-3-8 18:02:22 |只看该作者
哇~首先膜拜一下你的语言运用能力!
能力有限,不妥之处请见谅哈~

卧沙场-I17-sophie改.doc

28 KB, 下载次数: 2

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
11
发表于 2011-3-8 22:23:40 |只看该作者
3.8   A 07
TIME  45 MINS              WORDS 388
This argument seems plausible in its reasoning, yet it is brimming with patent flaws. By citing the fact that the number of factories in Clearview has doubled since last year and the number of patients that local hospital has treated with respiratory illnesses also increased by 25 percent, the auther have drawn a conclusion that environment has deteoriated and this effects should be attributed to Clearview town council, including Frank Braun, the candidates for mayor.

The auther's whole statement is based on a simple research, in which only a brief recount is mentioned. It is presented in this artical that the number of factories doubled last year and air pollution level has escalated during the same time. However, there is no causal relations between these two facts since no evidence pertaining to further information of those plants is provided. It is possible that the newly-built industry are all environment-friendly with strict demands for emitting toxic pollutants, or to an extreme degree, all the new industries are aiming at purifying the ecology, especially the air. In this sence, it is no reason for us to contribute the polluted air condition to the booming industry.

All the phenomena and speculation are observed or completed within one year, which is sufficient for summerizing a convincing summery. Nothing scientific ought to be presumed with a frivilous attitude, especially the consideration of the lasting time, in that the final inferance is subject to the testing period. How could a statement be persuasive if the related experiment is finished in a hurry and how could our idea be reliable if even we hardly believe it?

Even admitting that Clearview town council should be blamed for the deteoriation of environment, it is of no reason to claim that Frank Braun is unsuitable for the position of mayor. There is a great chance that Braun is a distinguished leader in that group, trying the convert the conventions into a more healthy, more advanced theory. Although Ann Green is a partisan of the Good Earth Coalition, which holds an enviroment-friendly attitude, there is no reason to predict that Green is also a advocant for improving environment. Since on proof has ever been presented concerning the particulars of Braun and Green, it appears ridiculous to anounce that Green is more suitable for the position of mayor than Braun.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
12
发表于 2011-3-8 22:30:08 |只看该作者
3.8 a07
TIME:45MINS   WORDS:388
This argument seems plausible in its reasoning, yet it is brimming with patent flaws. By citing the fact that the number of factories in Clearview has doubled since last year and the number of patients that local hospital has treated with respiratory illnesses also increased by 25 percent, the auther have drawn a conclusion that environment has deteoriated and this effects should be attributed to Clearview town council, including Frank Braun, the candidates for mayor.

The auther's whole statement is based on a simple research, in which only a brief recount is mentioned. It is presented in this artical that the number of factories doubled last year and air pollution level has escalated during the same time. However, there is no causal relations between these two facts since no evidence pertaining to further information of those plants is provided. It is possible that the newly-built industry are all environment-friendly with strict demands for emitting toxic pollutants, or to an extreme degree, all the new industries are aiming at purifying the ecology, especially the air. In this sence, it is no reason for us to contribute the polluted air condition to the booming industry.

All the phenomena and speculation are observed or completed within one year, which is sufficient for summerizing a convincing summery. Nothing scientific ought to be presumed with a frivilous attitude, especially the consideration of the lasting time, in that the final inferance is subject to the testing period. How could a statement be persuasive if the related experiment is finished in a hurry and how could our idea be reliable if even we hardly believe it?

Even admitting that Clearview town council should be blamed for the deteoriation of environment, it is of no reason to claim that Frank Braun is unsuitable for the position of mayor. There is a great chance that Braun is a distinguished leader in that group, trying the convert the conventions into a more healthy, more advanced theory. Although Ann Green is a partisan of the Good Earth Coalition, which holds an enviroment-friendly attitude, there is no reason to predict that Green is also a advocant for improving environment. Since on proof has ever been presented concerning the particulars of Braun and Green, it appears ridiculous to anounce that Green is more suitable for the position of mayor than Braun.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
107
注册时间
2011-2-25
精华
0
帖子
0
13
发表于 2011-3-10 22:13:19 |只看该作者
3.10 argument161
WORDS 422  TIME 1HOUR
Although this article seems plausible in its presentation, yet it is brimming with several patent flaws in its logic and accuracy. By citing two recent researches, the prior one in which the respondents were asked to reply their favorite reading materials, and the later one in which the researching objects were mainly focused on libraries yet with a distinct answer compared to the former one, the arguer drew a conclusion that the first study is misrepresented.

In the first research, only the information regarding the researches, the University of Leeville, and the researching method, in which the respondents were asked to response their favorite reading materials, are presented. Considering the deficiencies of the details in the former study, it is reasonable to question the property of its conclusion, which was also denied by the later study. The respondents in this study, may not be representative, for example, what if the replier are all in their senior age? A majority of people in their senior age are fond of recalling affaires in their adolescence so if the answers were constituted mainly by old citizens, the view of first study is unconvincing.

The second study, which also aimed at finding out the reading habits of citizens in the region, either failed to persuade the readers in lack of sufficient particulars. Another overwhelming drawback in this later study is that the objects, the public libraries, is leading to deviation from the core purpose this study. It seems that he researcher have overridden a basic fact that public library is one channel for populace to search for knowledge, but never the only one. Take the network for an instance, computer is booming in today's world and Internet provides a most convenient way for citizens to grasp knowledge. Considering this overpowering flaw, this article and its concluded opinion is unreliable.

Although these two experiments were both trying to search out something concerning about the reading habits of the native inhabitants, considering the distinction between the research objects and their inaccuracy in logical analysis, it is ridiculous to make a comparison between the two studies and it is unacceptable to deny one with the one-sided conclusion of the other. Analogy is a scientific analytical method through which new assumptions are prone to be predicted. Nothing scientific ought to be presumed with frivolous attitude. In the affairs of research, the consideration of object group, the basic foundation for the entire experiment, and the methodological analysis, through which a reliable inference would be inferred, should both be smoothing in logic and meticulous in details. To make this conclusion trustworthy, a revised experiment subjects and a more meticulous induction is suggested.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
284
注册时间
2010-12-25
精华
0
帖子
6
14
发表于 2011-3-10 23:40:29 |只看该作者
While admitting the importance of respect and obeisance for the just laws, the arguer states that it is probably more important to disobey or even resist those unjust laws. Considering the fact that all functions of modern society are promised by the prestige of common justice, I agree with the opinion that all the populace ought to observe law system. However, since no definition or limitation is presented concerning the so-called unjust, it seems unreasonable to suggest a hostile or radical attitude towards it.

It is widely believed as inalienable rights for each citizen to pursue happiness, to support family by making wealth and to ensure the proper condition of those that they cherish. Promise to guarantee the civil rights and elevate social living standards is a routine ritually repeated each time in the presidential inauguration. The significance of regulations for our daily lives is self-evident, just like the role of traffic lights for the order of vehicles. One striking distinction of modern society compared with antiquity is the belief that we commonly shared, the orders that we abide with our own accords.第一段说守法的重要性。可是我觉得应该明确守“just law”的重要性

However, when facing the darkness, such as unfairness, never should we retain reticence. Taking the fascism for an example, before the World War Two建议用WWII,比较节约时间, fascism was prevailing in Japan, German and Italy mostly这个副词怪怪的 . After years of deliberate preparation, fascism dictators started their invasion towards their neighbors but were condemned by the pacifists all the world. To further their daydreamingdaydream to break the world structure and promote the evil theory-fascism, the Axis Power provoked the whole world, yet to their surprise, the situation processed beyond their control shortly after the complete eruption of the war. Without the courage against evil and the endeavor to topple the tyranny, there never comes the triumph of World War Two and the new peace witnesses the power strength of human’s volition.这个例子过长了点

Since any rule has a limitation more or less, by promising interest of majority at the expense of minority, it is impossible for our law system to satisfy all citizens involved. We are likely to find us on a slippery slope towards sanctioning all types of illegal behaviors if willful rebellion according to emotional judgment towards law is permitted or recommended. It is strictly forbidden to emit toxic pollutants without further purifying steps beforehand, in that the law protects the health of nearby habitants and the intactness of ecology from being polluted. On the other hand, this regulation undoubtedly has broken the interests of chemical factories, electrical plants and other industries, for that the costs for waste treatment equipment are still a heavy burden. Authority pertaining to explaining the legal system and a further compensation for the vulnerable minority is a placebo to pacify the conflicting tension.这个例子想说明人们对不公正的法律要有妥协性吗?可是我个人认为妥协性是要有的,但是少数群体还是可以通过合理的手段维护自己利益。所以反抗不对,但是因说明还有其他途径表达。

No one could deny that the smoothing functions of modern society are promised by the authority of legal system. Although we also cherish the spirits of resistance under tyranny, yet it is unreasonable to take willful and radical actions only if we are not in favor of specific laws.

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
0
寄托币
171
注册时间
2010-11-26
精华
0
帖子
2
15
发表于 2011-3-11 22:58:55 |只看该作者
楼主很厉害啊,现在就要求时间了 而且文章还写得很好!PFPF

A-7卧沙场by-adolph.doc

30 KB, 下载次数: 2

使用道具 举报

RE: aw 作文贴(闲来无事请勿灌水) [修改]

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
aw 作文贴(闲来无事请勿灌水)
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1235545-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
回顶部