aw 作文贴（闲来无事请勿灌水）

夏诺多UID: 2981956

Although this article seems plausible in its presentation, yet it is brimming with several patent flaws in its logic and accuracy. By citing two recent researches, the prior one in which the respondents were asked to reply their favorite reading materials, and the later one in which the researching objects were mainly focused on libraries yet with a distinct answer compared to the former one, the arguer drew a conclusion that the first study is misrepresented.插入语太长了吧。。 In the first research, only the information regarding the researches, the University of Leeville, and the researching method,这几个插入语太零散了 in which the respondents were asked to response their favorite reading materials, are presented. Considering the deficiencies of the details in the former study, it is reasonable to question the property of its conclusion, which was also denied by the later study. The respondents in this study, may not be representative, for example, what if the replier are all in their senior age? A majority of people in their senior age are fond of recalling affaires in their adolescence so if the answers were constituted mainly by old citizens, the view of the first study is unconvincing. The second study, which also aimed at finding out the reading habits of citizens in the region, either虽然是表比较，但是同一句话需把比较双方放出来吧？。。我也不确定。。 failed to persuade the readers in lack of sufficient particulars. Another overwhelming drawback in this later study is that the objects, the public libraries, is leading to deviation from the core purpose of this study. It seems that the researcher have overridden a basic fact that public library is one channel for populace to search for knowledge, but never the only one你这后面一小句给人歧义，让人觉得调查者认为图书馆是一条途径，但不是唯一途径。所以后面断句要更加明显一点. Take the network for an instance, computer is booming in today's world感觉有点中式，用nowadays就好 and Internet provides a most convenient way for citizens to grasp knowledge很形象～. Considering this overpowering flaw, this article and its concluded opinion is unreliable. Although these two experiments were both trying to search out something concerning about the reading habits of the native inhabitants, considering the distinction between the research objects and their inaccuracy in logical analysis, it is ridiculous to make a comparison between the two studies and it is unacceptable to deny one with the one-sided conclusion of the other. Analogy is a scientific analytical method through which new assumptions are prone to be predicted. Nothing scientific ought to be presumed with frivolous attitude. In the affairs of research, the consideration of object group, the basic foundation for the entire experiment, and the methodological analysis, through which a reliable inference would be inferred, should both be smoothing in logic and meticulous in details. To make this conclusion trustworthy, a revised experiment subjects and a more meticulous induction is suggested. 看得出你很想脱离模板写作～虽然有点风险，但是回报很高，加油～

卧沙场UID: 3016143

issue 130.doc (22 KB, 下载次数: 8)

2011-3-17 22:21:43 上传

下载次数: 8