Daily writing by CrazyJoO

crazyjooUID: 2805124

3.5

tpo 1 综合写作: 20 min 319 words

The reading passage and the listening material discuss about the four-day week employment policy. The author believes that such policy will benefit the company and employees themselves as well as the country's unemployment rate. The speaker, however, states that this policy will make things worse and denies the three benefits of the policy mentioned in the passage respectively.

First of all, the reading passage contends that the policy will increase the company's profit. In contrast, the speaker argues that the policy will make things go to the other direction. The expense of a company which employs the policy will wind up given the fact that the number of the employees will increase. That is to say, the company has to spend more money for those extra employees. For example, the company would be inevitably forced to build more offices, to buy more computers and to pay more money on the employees' healthy care.

Secondly, according to the reading passage, the policy will ameliorate the problem of unemployment. On the contrary, the speaker in the lecture casts doubt on the viewpoint by saying that company will no necessarily hire more employees for the sake of the cost. Besides, company tends to make their original employees work more and these employees who only need to work four day a week are forced to take five days' workload.

Finally, the writer holds the opinion that the option of a four-day workweek will enhance the life quality of individual employees. Nevertheless, this is challenged by the lecture. The speaker thinks that the policy will prevent the employee from advancing their careers by decreasing their job abilities. In this respect, these employees are more likely to lose their jobs and their income will drop accordingly. In addition, the have less possibility to be prompt to some jobs such as manager and supervisor since people in these positions have to work five days a week.

crazyjooUID: 2805124

tpo 14 综合



The reading passage and the listening material discuss about salvage logging. The author of the passage supports it because it will benefit the forest as well as the economy. However, the speaker does not agree on this idea.

First, the passage indicates that removing the dead trees from the forest, one of the main activities involved in the salvage logging, will make space for fresh growth. However, the speaker contradicts it by saying that the nature process of decomposing of those dead trees will enrich the soil, which will make the condition more suitable for the growth of young trees. Moreover, as the speaker added, removing the dead trees away will harm the recover of forest because trees would not gain nutrient from the dead trees.

Second, the author says that removing the dead trees will prevent insect infestation from taking place. Conversely, the speaker thinks that this statement may result from oversimplification, that is to say, the speaker believes that the author may ignore the positive aspects of those dead trees. For instance, the dead trees would become proper inhabitant for birds and insects that will improve the health of the forest.

Finally, the passage contends that salvage logging has several economic benefits. On the contrary, the speaker believes that the things mentioned in the passage are unlikely to happen. On the one hand, the cost for using helicopter or other vehicles to transport the dead trees to factories are expensive. From this respect, it does not make the use of damaged trees an economical choice. On the other hand, the whole process of salvage logging would not last long time and it also does not need many workers to take part in. Additional, people tend to hire workers who have relevant experience rather than local residents. In this way, salvage logging would not necessary create addition jobs.

crazyjooUID: 2805124

独立
Title: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Advertising is the main cause of unhealthy eating habits？

With the rapid development of mass media, especially television and the Internet, it seems like that everyone is immersed in the sea of advertisements, which in turns affect our life in many aspects. In this respect, does it really exist a essential cause-and-affect relationship between advertising and unhealthy eating habits? From my perspective, advertisements do play a main role in making children form unhealthy eating habits but they are not likely to have similar affect on adults.

Admittedly, we cannot deny that advertising do play a role in causing unhealthy eating habits. Is not it common to see advertisement showing those tasty junk food as well as different kinds of delicious snaps? These advertisements have a big influence on children whose eating habits may be greatly changed to unhealthy ones because of the luring images in the advertisement. One example aptly illustrates this point involves my little brother William. Being fully attracted by the advertisement of KFC, William asks my mother to take him to KFC twice a week. And gradually he refuses to eat healthy food such as vegetable. When i try to make him eat vegetable and fruit, he always go away, shouting that these are not delicious food appeared in the advertisement!

However, adults are much less likely to form unhealthy eating habits because of the advertisement. On the one hand, adults have already formed daily eating habits. These eating habits would not be changed by advertisement alone easily because they tend to have more regular time schedules than children do. Workload makes them focus on job and they do not have much time to think about what to eat or whether they should change eating habits.  On the other hand, it is heavy workload but advertisement that causes unhealthy eating habits. For instance, my brother Kyle, a diligent businessman, has been busying with his job all day long and does not have much time to eat with families. The changing timetable of his job completely disturbs his eating habits. He has got used to have dinner at mid-night because he does not have time to finish his meal at normal dinner time.

To sum up, when it comes to the forming of bad eating habits, advertisements tend to affect child much more greatly than adults. From this view, it is the mass media's responsibility to provide proper guide to children and make them have a healthy diet.

hcp4715UID: 2697633

3# crazyjoo 楼主的例子使用很给力，学习了！ 3.7号独立写作（rev. by hcp).doc (30.5 KB, 下载次数: 3)

2011-3-8 16:19:40 上传

下载次数: 3

july07UID: 2756237

With the rapid development of mass media, especially television and the Internet, it seems like that everyone is immersed in the sea of advertisements, which in turns affect our life in many aspects. In this respect, does it really exist a essential cause-and-affect relationship between advertising and unhealthy eating habits? From my perspective, advertisements do play a main role in making children form unhealthy eating habits but they are not likely to have similar affect on adults.2 a* H8 J) ^  L1 x
$ J3 P/ f- Q# g3 K) t$ @
Admittedly, we cannot deny that advertising do play a role in causing unhealthy eating habits. Is not it common to see advertisement showing those tasty junk food as well as different kinds of delicious snaps? These advertisements have a big influence on children whose eating habits may be greatly changed to unhealthy ones because of the luring images in the advertisement. One example aptly illustrates this point involves my little brother William. Being fully attracted by the advertisement of KFC, William asks my mother to take him to KFC twice a week. And gradually he refuses to eat healthy food such as vegetable. When i try to make him eat vegetable and fruit, he always go away, shouting that these are not delicious food appeared in the advertisement!
8 Y& I" z# K- g4 J& A9 X! I8 n2 n3 _' {" b' D- v. p* I
However, adults are much less likely to form unhealthy eating habits because of the advertisement. On the one hand, adults have already formed daily eating habits. These eating habits would not be changed by advertisement alone easily because they tend to have more regular time schedules than children do. Workload makes them focus on job and they do not have much time to think about what to eat or whether they should change eating habits.  On the other hand, it is heavy workload but advertisement that causes unhealthy eating habits. For instance, my brother Kyle, a diligent businessman, has been busying with his job all day long and does not have much time to eat with families. The changing timetable of his job completely disturbs his eating habits. He has got used to have dinner at mid-night because he does not have time to finish his meal at normal dinner time. +
a, S" N+ r( H. U- c) B

to sum up, when it comes to the forming of bad eating habits, advertisements tend to affect child much more greatly than adults. From this view, it is the mass media's responsibility to provide proper guide to children and make them have a healthy diet.
仔细看了作者的文章， 作文把讨论的对象 分成了 成年人 和小孩子 中间的论证 简单明了 很有说服力  学习了

crazyjooUID: 2805124

3-12 独立

Do you agree with the idea that parents should reward their school-age children with money for the high marks they get at school? Some people would support it since money is certainly a strong incentive for children. They can buy what they longing for as long as they have great performance in exams. However, from my perspective, it is inappropriate to give children money when they do well in exams.

Admittedly, giving money to children for their high mark grade they get at school will facilitate their study. Because many children do not have formed a proper understanding of study, in other words, they have not figured out why they should study. As a result, they study aimlessly, which will inevitably be harmful to their future. However, giving money to children for their good mark of exam will make them form a clear goal of study. As a result, they will pay more attention to study and spend more time on it and. According to a recent national survey, 85 percent of these children make a huge progress in their study. In this respect, giving money to children for their high mark grade does improve children's study.

However, such rewarding would not actually be beneficial to children in long term. Children would only focus on those subjects that will be tested without paying attention to other subjects which are also important to children's growth but do not need to hold exams, such as arts class and moral lesson. One example aptly illustrates this point involves my brother Kyle. In order to buy the toy car he had been longing for he spent many hours on studying each day. Though he gets high grades in exams, however, my mother worries about him because his behaviors are rude and he does not talk to families politely. Finally, the truth comes out. In fact, in order to have more time for preparing for exams, Kyle never attend the moral classes.

Moreover, giving money to children for their high mark grade would not help them form a right sense of value and the goal of academic career. On the one hand, such strategy will make them form a wrong sense of value. Children do not tend to do what is justice or right but to do what is rewarding and make them have money. On the other hand, giving money to children for their high mark grade, which establish a relationship between money and grades will also be harmful to their future academic career. Thus, children who have no a right understanding of study will believe that money is the ultimate goal of academic career rather than the truth of universal. And this wrong idea is likely to affect their future academic career. This is very harmful because scholars who put more weight on money will sacrifices the truth in order to satisfy their greed.

To sum up, giving money to children for their high mark grade will do more harm than good. Though money may enhance children's performance in exams in short term but it will turn out to affect children negatively in the long run. Parents should considerate some more proper and meaningful things such as books or stationary as rewarding to their children. In this way, such rewarding will also incite children's interest in study without bring any negative influences mention above.

crazyjooUID: 2805124

3-12 独立

Do you agree with the idea that parents should reward their school-age children with money for the high marks they get at school? Some people would support it since money is certainly a strong incentive for children. They can buy what they longing for as long as they have great performance in exams. However, from my perspective, it is inappropriate to give children money when they do well in exams.

Admittedly, giving money to children for their high mark grade they get at school will facilitate their study. Because many children do not have formed a proper understanding of study, in other words, they have not figured out why they should study. As a result, they study aimlessly, which will inevitably be harmful to their future. However, giving money to children for their good mark of exam will make them form a clear goal of study. As a result, they will pay more attention to study and spend more time on it and. According to a recent national survey, 85 percent of these children make a huge progress in their study. In this respect, giving money to children for their high mark grade does improve children's study.

However, such rewarding would not actually be beneficial to children in long term. Children would only focus on those subjects that will be tested without paying attention to other subjects which are also important to children's growth but do not need to hold exams, such as arts class and moral lesson. One example aptly illustrates this point involves my brother Kyle. In order to buy the toy car he had been longing for he spent many hours on studying each day. Though he gets high grades in exams, however, my mother worries about him because his behaviors are rude and he does not talk to families politely. Finally, the truth comes out. In fact, in order to have more time for preparing for exams, Kyle never attend the moral classes.

Moreover, giving money to children for their high mark grade would not help them form a right sense of value and the goal of academic career. On the one hand, such strategy will make them form a wrong sense of value. Children do not tend to do what is justice or right but to do what is rewarding and make them have money. On the other hand, giving money to children for their high mark grade, which establish a relationship between money and grades will also be harmful to their future academic career. Thus, children who have no a right understanding of study will believe that money is the ultimate goal of academic career rather than the truth of universal. And this wrong idea is likely to affect their future academic career. This is very harmful because scholars who put more weight on money will sacrifices the truth in order to satisfy their greed.

To sum up, giving money to children for their high mark grade will do more harm than good. Though money may enhance children's performance in exams in short term but it will turn out to affect children negatively in the long run. Parents should considerate some more proper and meaningful things such as books or stationary as rewarding to their children. In this way, such rewarding will also incite children's interest in study without bring any negative influences mention above.

crazyjooUID: 2805124

3-12 综合 tpo19



The reading passage and the listening material discuss about buzzing. The author of the passage holds a low opinion toward buzzing for three reasons. The speaker, however, contend that the statement mentioned in the passage is misleading and denies the three points in the passage respectively.

First of all, the reading passage says buzzing is not trustful since they are just paid advertising. In contrast, the speaker argues that buzzing is trustworthy because buzzers are also users of the product who think the product is really good and that is why those companies hire these customers as their employees. In this way, the speaker contradicts the first view made in the passage.

Second, according to the reading passage, consumers are more likely to believe buzzers less critically than they should given the fact that buzzers pretend they are just private individuals, which will hurt the interest of consumers after all.  On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on the viewpoint by saying that the special relationship between buzzers and consumers will incite consumers ask more questions about the products, such as the price of the product and how long can it be used. In this respect, this will suit the consumers because they will certainly have a deeper understanding of the products they buy.

Finally, the author holds the opinion that buzzing will harm social relationships.  Nevertheless, this is challenged by the speaker. He thinks that if consumers love the products suggested by the buzzers and have a good using experience, they may regard the buzzers as trustful persons. Instead of harming the social relationship, buzzing actually ameliorate the relationship between buzzers and those people around them.

crazyjooUID: 2805124

3-12 综合 tpo19



The reading passage and the listening material discuss about buzzing. The author of the passage holds a low opinion toward buzzing for three reasons. The speaker, however, contend that the statement mentioned in the passage is misleading and denies the three points in the passage respectively.

First of all, the reading passage says buzzing is not trustful since they are just paid advertising. In contrast, the speaker argues that buzzing is trustworthy because buzzers are also users of the product who think the product is really good and that is why those companies hire these customers as their employees. In this way, the speaker contradicts the first view made in the passage.

Second, according to the reading passage, consumers are more likely to believe buzzers less critically than they should given the fact that buzzers pretend they are just private individuals, which will hurt the interest of consumers after all.  On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on the viewpoint by saying that the special relationship between buzzers and consumers will incite consumers ask more questions about the products, such as the price of the product and how long can it be used. In this respect, this will suit the consumers because they will certainly have a deeper understanding of the products they buy.

Finally, the author holds the opinion that buzzing will harm social relationships.  Nevertheless, this is challenged by the speaker. He thinks that if consumers love the products suggested by the buzzers and have a good using experience, they may regard the buzzers as trustful persons. Instead of harming the social relationship, buzzing actually ameliorate the relationship between buzzers and those people around them.

sun3mayUID: 2574771

3-12 独立( C, `" X+ |! [2 m5 N2 X" U
+ b) X) I. S( v8 i% v, |
Do you agree with the idea that parents should reward their school-age children with money for the high marks they get at school? （这句是正文吗？如果是的话，建议不要重复题目哈~如果不是正文，不好意思哈。）Some people would support it since money is certainly a strong incentive for children. They can buy what they longing for as long as they have great performance in exams. However, from my perspective, it is inappropriate to give children money when they do well in exams.
) ^: E1 n/ E5 ~& [  _
Admittedly, giving money to children for their high mark grade they get at school will facilitate their study. Because many children do not have formed a proper understanding of study, in other words, they have not figured out why they should study. As a result, they study aimlessly, which will inevitably be harmful to their future. However, giving money to children for their good mark of exam will make them form a clear goal of study. As a result, they will pay more attention to study and spend more time on it and（去掉）. According to a recent national survey, 85 percent of these children make a huge progress in their study. In this respect, giving money to children for their high mark grade does improve children's study.$ }$ Z: E4 C1 ]# x$ K7 L

However, such rewarding would not actually be beneficial to children in long term. Children would only focus on those subjects that will be tested without paying attention to other subjects which are also important to children's growth but do not need to hold exams, such as arts class and moral lesson（建议都改成复数好些）.（这个观点很好的） One example aptly illustrates this point involves my brother Kyle. In order to buy the toy car he had been longing for he spent many hours on studying each day. Though he gets high grades in exams, however, my mother worries about him because his behaviors are rude and he does not talk to families politely. Finally, the truth comes out. In fact, in order to have more time for preparing for exams, Kyle never attend the moral classes.

, z8 d4 f9 Q. m
Moreover, giving money to children for their high mark grade would not help them form a right sense of value and the goal of academic career. On the one hand, such strategy will make them form a wrong sense of value. Children do not tend to do what is justice or right but to do what is rewarding and make them have money. On the other hand, giving money to children for their high mark grade, which establish a relationship between money and grades will also be harmful to their future academic career. Thus, children who have no a right understanding of study will believe that money is the ultimate goal of academic career rather than the truth of universal. And this wrong idea is likely to affect their future academic career. This is very harmful because scholars who put more weight on money will sacrifices the truth in order to satisfy their greed. $ W-












}; i/ d# m6 c8 \$ T; I* u
- X; Z* V" P1 S9 o$ |; k( F
To sum up, giving money to children for their high mark grade will do more harm than good. Though money may enhance children's performance in exams in short term but it will turn out to affect children negatively in the long run. Parents should considerate some more proper and meaningful things such as books or stationary as rewarding to their children. In this way, such rewarding will also incite children's interest in study without bring any negative influences mention above.



语言很棒，提到的两个正面的观点都挺好滴~学习了！
很有GRE作文的感觉。。。
一起加油！

cacovilUID: 3028414

3-12 综合 tpo19


The reading passage and the listening material discuss about buzzing. The author of the passage holds a low opinion toward buzzing for three reasons. The speaker, however, contend that the statement mentioned in the passage is misleading and denies the three points in the passage respectively.

First of all, the reading passage says buzzing is not trustful since they are just paid advertising. In contrast, the speaker argues that buzzing is trustworthy because buzzers are also users of the product who think the product is really good and that is why those companies hire these customers as their employees. In this way, the speaker contradicts the first view made in the passage.

Second, according to the reading passage, consumers are more likely to believe buzzers less critically than they should given the fact that buzzers pretend they are just private individuals, which will hurt the interest of consumers after all.  On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on the viewpoint by saying that the special relationship between buzzers and consumers will incite consumers ask more questions about the products, such as the price of the product and how long can it be used. In this respect, this will suit the consumers because they will certainly have a deeper understanding of the products they buy.

Finally, the author holds the opinion that buzzing will harm social relationships.  Nevertheless, this is challenged by the speaker. He thinks that if consumers love the products suggested by the buzzers and have a good using experience, they may regard the buzzers as trustful persons. Instead of harming the social relationship, buzzing actually ameliorate the relationship between buzzers and those people around them.

厄，没什么可改的，硬说的话，第二个观点消费者会问price, service and how long.....拉了个服务而已，不过不太重要
第三点我听错了，看到你的才发现把experience写成expectation....
语言很好，我有种看阅读的感觉，学习了很多。。。

crazyjooUID: 2805124

3.15 独立


It is not uncommon to see that celebrities or rich people are robbed by people. It is also frequent to see that many Hollywood starts spend their money on drugs which in turns destroys their career and put in jails. In this term, some people may say that people with less possession will be much happier. Though this statement sounds reasonable, from my personal perspective, money still plays an essential part in making people happy as long as people get to learn how to use their money properly.

Admittedly, money sometimes can upset its owners. On the one hand, large amounts of money will inevitably attract the attention from thefts and robbers. In this way, those rich guys have to worry about their own personal securities and are enforced to hire guards to protect them. Moreover, they cannot show up in many public area alone such as supermarket or park because the huge possessions he/she got make these activities very dangerous. On the other hand, many celebrities square their money and spend them on buying drugs or doing many other nasty things. As soon as these scandals are exposure to public, these celebrities would have to spend the rest of their lives in the shadows.

However, the possession will make its owner happy if the money is properly spent. Instead of spending money on those shame things, donating large mounts of money to mercy institution would definitely increase the fame of the donator as well as his/her social position. One example aptly illustrate this point involves Bill Gates, who was once the richest people on earth. Though empire of Microsoft established by Gates dominated the computer industry and almost monopolized the whole industry that making many people who work for small company lose their jobs, making many people regard Gates as a guy who only care about the profit, his recent huge donation to mercy institution change the situation greatly. Who would say that he would not be happier as more people begin to speak highly of him?

Moreover, money is the very foundation to achieve your goals and dreams. At least money will save you lots of trouble on your way towards the termination. How could you be happy if you are a lover of physics but you cannot afford the tuition of those famous graduate universities that have agreed to accept you? How could you be happy if you are wonderful dancer but you can hardly win the tournament because you cannot afford to buy those attractive and shining clothes? In this world, you cannot do many things without money and how could you be happy if you cannot do anything you want?

To sum up, having less money does not necessarily make people happier and things tend to go to the other end. We should use money properly and decently. Only by doing this, money would be our source of happiness rather than the source of conflict.

sEven_zhUID: 3007258

3.15独立修改

crazyjooUID: 2805124

In the last past ten years, we could not deny that we have experience the vast of benefits and convenience as well as the increasing complexity brought by the development of modern society. As the hope of future, we, young people should learn how to plan and organize things well in this intricate world. However, from my personal perspective, it is more essential for us to make things easy, that is to say, to simplify them.

Admittedly, having the ability to plan and organize will definitely be beneficial to us. We have to learn varies of subjects and many of us chose interdisciplinary as their majors such as biochemistry and bioinformatics. How could you handle these different subjects well without having a proper learning plan? How could you have a adequate understanding of every aspects of those interdisciplinary without organizing your minds? How could you establish a reasonable connection between those relevant and co-related subjects involved in bioinformatics? As my major is bioinformatics, I have to create time schedule to make sure that I will spend apt time on each subject and I also have to summarize and organize the things I learned in the classroom by keeping asking myself questions such as how can computer science be applied to statistics biology. Only by doing so can I get high grades in such a complex subject.

Though planning and organizing is vital to young people's study, however, I think that to master how to make things simple would help us to a greater extend. Learning how to simplify things will save you lots of time which is inevitably took up by the process of planning and organizing. Let us go back to my major bioinformatics again. As it mentioned above, I have to spend lots of time on building the relationship and connection between various subjects and on forming a deep understanding of each subject, both of which will occupy lots of time without no doubt though i already got elaborate plan in hand. Indeed, isn't it painstaking when people has to read the textbook of each subject one by one?  In order to solve this problem, I try to make my textbooks thinner. In other words, to simplify them by extracting the major ideas of them, which will also helps me memorize them. Moreover, I draw diagram to represent the relationship between different events.  As a result, I do not have to spend too much time on learning while I can still get high grades in exams and I can use the time I save by simplifying to do many other things.

To sum up, planning or organizing alone will not necessarily bring you many benefits that you expect as things are getting more and more complex. Just try to simplify them and exam them in a different angle, you will find that the complex world will not be such complex as it seems to be.

zhennuptUID: 2748934

14# crazyjoo
In the last past ten years, we could notdeny that we enjoy the vast of benefits and convenience as well as theincreasing complexity brought by the development of modern society. As the hope of future(未来的希望? 感觉太中式了, 可能指代人不太好. Google查了一下可能可以考虑改为the hope of mankind), we,young people should learn how to plan and organize things well in this intricate
world. However, from my personal perspective, it ismore essential for us to make things easy, that is to say, to simplify them.

Admittedly, having the ability to plan and organize will definitely bebeneficial to us. We have to learn varies of subjects and many of us choseinterdisciplinary as their majors such as biochemistry and bioinformatics. Howcould you handle these different subjects well without having a proper learningplan? How could you have a(an) adequateunderstanding of every aspects(aspect) of thoseinterdisciplinary without organizing your minds? How could you establish areasonable connection between those relevant and co-related subjects involvedin bioinformatics? As my major is bioinformatics, I have to create time scheduleto make sure that I will spend apt time on each subject and I also have tosummarize and organize the things I learned in the classroom by keeping askingmyself questions such as how can computer science be applied to statisticsbiology. Only by doing so can I get high grades in such a complex subject.

Though planning and organizing is vital to young people's study (呃, 你承认它是vital了, vital比essential 语气还强吧), however, I think thatto master how to make things simple would not onlyhelp you(? 这个not only在这是什么意思, …would help youmore) in study the complex subjects. Learning how tosimplify things will save you lots of time which is inevitably took(taken) up by the process of planning andorganizing. Let us go back to (the example of learning)my major bioinformatics again. As it (was, 这里的be应该不能省略吧) mentioned above, I have to spend lots of time on building the relationshipand connection between various subjects and on forming a deep understanding ofeach subject, both of which will occupy lots of time without no doubt though i already got(时态, 用完成时更好些或虚拟语气作为假设, I mayhave already elaborate plans) elaborate plan(plans) in hand. Indeed, isn't it painstaking(经查, 它是褒义词表示非常努力. toilful?) when people has(have) to read the textbook of each subject one byone?  In order to solve this problem, I try to (make) my textbooks thinner. In other words, tosimplify them by extracting the major ideas of them, which will also helps(help) me memorize them. Moreover, I draw diagram(s) to represent the relationship betweendifferent events.  As a result, I do not have to spend too much timeon learning while I can still get high grades in exams and I can use the time Isave by simplifying to do many other things.

To sum up, planning or organizing alone will not necessarily bring you manybenefits that you expect as things are getting more and more complex. Just tryto simplify them and exam them in a different angle, you will find that thecomplex world will not be such complex as it seems to be.

一些词用的相当棒. 如intricate, schedule, elaborate.
观点从complexity上展开我没有想到过, 对我个人来说比较独特.
论证的detail非常丰富
单从观点上来说,简化事情是organize和make plans的一种预处理的方式, 能简化organize的工作, 在文中是突出了节省时间.所以说可能在第三段强调plan和organize的能力需要make things simple作为前提更好一些, 毕竟第二段一堆排比句说明了那种能力是不可或缺的, 而在文中没有说明简化事情能力也同样可以做到.