作文帖。。。

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

先发个看看，第一次发贴

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.2 周六  独立
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Movies and televisions should always show audience good people being rewarded and bad people being punished.

Since electrical equipments have been playing key role in our daily life, an increasing number of knowledge could be obtained from films and TV set. Films and TV set, as one of important media to broad knowledge, have been influencing people's idea and viewpoint by their content gradually. Therefore, it is important to spread merit and good educational content in movie and television. So, I am very strongly in above statement that the films and TV series should show the appropriate results for the different people, respectively.

First of all, a great amount of children could get direct effect by watching TV and movies. Lately, a research has presented that above three quarters pupil would imitate and copy the behavior they saw in their daily life, including which from movies and television. Why all stories ended with "prince and princess, they live happily ever after", that is because the adults want children to believe the kindness and hope of human beings. It is often said, the education should start from babies. That’s the reason why the movie and television should play the good and optimal content. Not only the adolescents, but also the adults could be affected by the content in the electrical product profoundly. Such as, some thieves use the unusual way which is from the movies to steal other’s property. The movies and television provide the information to warn people taking care of private property; meanwhile, they give the opportunity of the bad people to learn more “professional skills”. If the bad person did not get their deserved result, how the people feel? If the person who rob other’s purse and became millionaire, all the working people could do the same thing, how about the safety of this society? We should let people know: you reap what you sow.

In addition, people prefer that the good person got the good result and bad person was punished by the justice. Human beings own justice in their potential sense. They are more likely to see the killer has been sent to the jail and the good guy has been leased under their natural instinct. On one hand, the movie and television is a kind of entertainment, they are amusing people. Consequently the end of a story should match audience favor. Otherwise, rarely people would appreciate the commercial product. On the other hand, the reasonable end could inspire people to some extent. When people were disappointed with real society, they rather believe there exists justice and hope which could point out the way of escaping the trap. A great movie or television should not only entertain people but also could educate them by its content.

All in all, I agree with above opinion that every story in television and movies should be ended with bad person punished. Whatever in emotion or in ethic aspect, people always want to get the idealized consequence in these storylines. Moreover, a positive and educational story should shows the true and false of the word rather than only amusing people in daily life.

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

TPO 17 综合

As listening to the lecture, there are three main arguements to the reading passages in aspects of urban area expansion, agricultrural area and pesticides.

First of all, the expansion of city won't decrease the amount of birds. Maybe some spices would shrink, but some others will increase. Such as the seagull, because of the increase urban area, the seagull could find more ports to stay and more food to eat. Futhermore, increasing number of population does not mean the decrease of greenland. Instead, because of the high requirements of daily life, some relevant green land would appear to meet the high-quality lives.

Moreover, according to the tapescripts, some new types of crops has appeared which do not contain the toxic objects. If this is true, the food for the bird did not decrease, but increase to great extent. Crops do not only satisfy humanbeing's nutrition needs, but also could meet the increasing number of some kinds of birds. By this way, the presentation in reading passage " bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline" is not true.

Last but not least, the traditional pesticide has been instead by a new non-toxic pesticide gradually, so worries about poisoned chemical are not necessary any more. As long as the crops is safe and health to those birds, the total amount will not decline by the pesticides. Enough crops could guarantee birds' reproducing successfully.

All the three factors could improve the number of birds in United States rather than contributed to declines in their population in reading passage.

凉言UID: 2996787

改好了~一起加油吧！

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

2011年4月4日 周一：
独立：
For successful development of a country, should a government focus its budget more on very young children education rather than on universities?   (09-11-07 NA)

In some developed country, the funds devoted on the universities have been declining these years. Such as UK, the government has reduced the budget on high quality education drastically, therefore leads to some disagreement from the undergraduates. However, in my opinion, I agree with the government that put on more funds in primary education like kid-garden rather than universities.

Firstly, more budgets on young children could enhance the whole social quality and keep social harmony, which are much more important than develop their country. As we all know, the criminal rate has been increasing these year in developed country. Even though the society has been greatly progressed, but there is no safety for their residence, how could country keep a substantial development? The plan of adding more funds in children’s education could effectively reduce this proportion by building their right viewpoint. By improving the facility and the staff’s quality; the children could learn not only the basic knowledge but also how to do a straightly honest person. Furthermore, if the environment has been improved, parents would prefer to send their kid in the school to accept education, which could reduce the danger of a single children being alone at home.

In addition, funds should be put in these young children who are not like the college students earned some extra fees for their tuition fees. More revenue in children’s education is reasonable to help release the stress of parents. On the other hand, no more funds in the university is a way to force these high educational adults to perform their social duty. If they want to continue to the higher education, they should afford the fees through some ways, such as doing a part-time job or being teaching assistant, which is good to them getting these preparation for entering the society in future.

All in all, as the developed country has exposed to the high speed progress, enhancing the society quality and harmony is much more significant than just accelerate the developing pace. So focus on primary education and devote more money in children’s education should be reasonable than those in universities.

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

TPO18

In the lecture, three main methods have been mentioned to address the decline of Torreya: first way is replanting these kinds of treen in same location. Second method is in a totally different environment to plant them again. Finally, raising them in the research center. All these three ways has been rejected by the tape scripts.

The first way could be available because their original circumstance with particular microclimate has been threatened by the global warming, and maybe will not be set and cool any more. Also, the river and the water in their surroundings would evaporate and turn dry by the increasing temperature of the whole universe.

Second methods cannot be applied because there had an instance before which did not work. One endanger species has been moved to another region, but turned that the "stranger" has killed most of the existing plants, including some rare species. In this way, the Torreya has been saved on the basis of killing other precious plants.

The last methods sounds feasible, but in fact, it did not consider about whether these is enough space for great population of Torreya. Saving this endanger spice could plant them in an environment with close monitor, but when the seeds grow to a high straight tree, how to manage and control them become another bothering question.

In general, the three ways presented in the lecture are not effective to solve Torreya's dying out.

sumessUID: 3008634

In the lecture, three main methods have been mentioned to address the decline of Torreya: first way is replanting these kinds of tree in same location. Second method is（ in a totally different environment）感觉这个拿到后面比较好 to plant them again. Finally, raising them in the research center. All these three ways has been rejected by the tape scripts.8 p  z0 K& m  R6 n2 y
6 o( }, S9 x3 f/ K  e1 m& z; h0 z% F
The first way could（not？？） be available because their original circumstance with particular microclimate has been threatened by the global warming, and maybe will not be set and cool down any more. Also, the river and the water in their surroundings would evaporate and turn dry by the increasing temperature of the whole universe. . B$ F* V% B; F6 G. x& T
, ~' M: X- j  Q% r5 I$ V
Second methods cannot be applied because there had an instance before which did not work. One endanger species has（had） been moved to another region, but turned that the "stranger" has killed most of the existing plants, including some rare species. In this way, the Torreya will 是不是会好点？？ has been saved on the basis of killing other precious plants.
. {! {, M# b$ T) v1 ~: T
The last methods sounds feasible, but in fact, it did not consider about（作为考虑的时候是不是不要about的？） whether these thereis enough space for great population of Torreya. Saving this endangered spice could plant them in an environment with close monitor, but when the seeds grow to a high straight tree, how to manage and control them become another bothering question(bothering question 没见过，所以保留，如果是对的就忽略它把）.
& X8 a& o: s" U2 Z% V7 M/ o
In general, the three ways presented in the lecture are not effective to solve the problem of Torreya's dying out.

sumessUID: 3008634

独立的话改在word里 但是发不了附件，可以发你邮箱吗

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

8# sumess

可以的，改好了的话发我邮箱吧。谢谢啦~

sun3mayUID: 2574771

改4.4独立
In some developed country, the funds devoted on the universities have been declining these years. Such as UK, the government has reduced the budget on high quality（高等教育：higher education） education drastically, therefore （that）leads to some disagreement from the undergraduates. However, in my opinion, I agree with the government that put on more funds in primary education like kid-garden rather than universities. 0 A6 {, n- T$ e- m2 B- R% t% y
5 k& @4 a7 ^2 c) ^$ B% R

Firstly, more budgets on young children could enhance the whole social quality and keep social harmony, which are much more important than develop their country. As we all know, the criminal rate has been increasing these year in developed country. Even though the society has been greatly progressed, but there is no safety for their residence, how could country keep a substantial development? The plan of adding more funds in children’s education could effectively reduce this proportion by building their right viewpoint. By improving the facility and the staff’s quality; the children could learn not only the basic knowledge but also how to do a straightly honest person. Furthermore, if the environment has been improved, parents would prefer to send their kid in the school to accept education, which could reduce the danger of a single children being alone at home. （这个观点稍微有点牵强，因为大部分犯罪的都是adult。个人建议：一定要保持本段原来的论点的话，建议加上几句论述说明对于年龄较小孩子的教育情况对于人们童年甚至成年后的行为有很大影响，甚至会成为导致或者防止犯罪的根源；虽然不知道这么说是不是真的符合事实，从逻辑上来讲的话，觉得差这么一环。）

In addition, funds should be put in these young children who are not like the college students earned some extra fees for their tuition fees. More revenue in children’s education is reasonable to help release the stress of parents. On the other hand, no more funds in the university is a way to force these high educational adults to perform their social duty. If they want to continue to the higher education, they should afford the fees through some ways, such as doing a part-time job or being teaching assistant, which is good to them getting these preparation for entering the society in future.（这段到后来好像有点偏了，建议在第一句说明对于早期教育的较多投入对小孩子和大学生两方面都有好处）. N' D! w+ H  I" o' L5 d
; s2 ~' P" L2 `: F3 a! J, J

All in all, as the developed country has exposed to the high speed progress, enhancing the society quality and harmony is much more significant than just accelerate the developing pace. So focus on primary education and devote more money in children’s education should be reasonable than those in universities

第二个观点显得稍微单薄了些，还需要再发展一下，可以举些例子来充实文章。开头的香港政府的例子举得挺好的，比较有新意。
有什么改的不对的再讨论哈！
PS.谢谢你的修改，建议很好的！一起加油！

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

2011年4月5日
周二
独立：
People would be happier if they had fewer possessions？ Agree or not?



There is no absolute definition of happiness. In my view, happiness is a kind of mental satisfactory depending on individuals. It is obvious that more money could buy more things which could help people feel satisfied. Therefore, I totally believe more possession could bring people more happiness, and there are main two reasons to support my viewpoint.

To begin with, as I mentioned above, more possession could afford for more desiring things which could bring happiness to people. For example, every pair of couple would like to have a sweet honey moon. But if the bride wants to travel to abroad, there is no enough money to meet her requirements; the bride would hardly feel happy. Contrarily, if the groom have a good budget on their honeymoon travel, the bride would feel happier and get great satisfactory. Furthermore, sometimes the possession itself could bring you happiness in the process of appreciating it. Such as, an amateur have an antique, he would enjoy himself in appreciating this artwork. Especially for a fanatical person, the more possessions, like the antique, he has, the more happiness he could get.

In addition, with a great amount of possessions, you would be more likely to doing some charity, which brings an increasing number of people happiness. When you acquire quite a large deal of property, you will not only consider your own enjoyment, but also supply happiness to others. Meanwhile, you will feel happier when you help other with your possessions. Like the CEO of Microsoft, Bill Gates, he has built a large number of capital funds which could offer aid for those who needs money. He has innumerable possessions; on the one hand, he could feel happy with the property he has got, because he could use the money to satisfy all his orders. On the other hands, he could feel happier by building increasing number of capital funds every year to assist more people that were trapped in trouble. The reason why he persists doing charity tirelessly is he could feel much happier in doing that.

In brief, the people who are exposed to more possession could get the emotional satisfactory through spending money on what they desire, as well as accomplishing other people’s wish. I firmly convince that people would get more happiness with more property.

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.5日  综合  tpo1
The viewpoints in the lecture have present three main doubts on the passage in the aspect of the increasing costs, more expectation and reducing life quality.

Firstly, in the lecture, if the four-day week policy has been applied, the company would spend more on training new people. With the stable revenue, the costs in training new employees would reduce the final profit greatly. Moreover, the increasing number of employees indicates the demand for more space for work environment and more electrical facilities, which could moderately decline company's profit as well.

Secondly, the employees who choose short workweek would be expected finish the same amount of job with those who choose five-day week. In this situation, those employees would feel more stress and pressure leading to make more error and faults rather than feel relaxed and alternative in their daily job.

Last but not least, more leisure time could be potential risk to decrease their life quality. Employees who choose the four-day week would be more likely to lose the chance in promotion. Even more, they have quite high proportion to be fired comparing with those chosen five-day week. This will directly influence their life's quality, especially in the financial crisis.

To sum up, because of more costs in training, more pressure in working and declined quality of life, the four-day week policy is far from applying in the United States.

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.6 独立

2011年3月6日 周三.doc (14.02 KB, 下载次数: 2)

2011-4-6 19:19:28 上传

下载次数: 2

ba80403UID: 3034877

4.5 独立作文

凉言UID: 2996787

改好~