作文帖。。。

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.9日  独立  上传晚了，麻烦改的同学了   综合TPO5上次写过了，所以这次没有写  不过  综合的同学放心我会去给你改的

jiangruiqianUID: 2838124

0411的作业在哪儿  综合我跟你一组   帮你改综合   可是没看到你的综合哈

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.11  独立

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.11综合，写的晚了麻烦修改的同学

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

写这个题目要难死我了。。。实在是找不到论点来支持了。麻烦改的童鞋了。

PS：昨天传错文件了   麻烦修改的同学  再改一次吧！！！对不起大家啦！！！！

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.12综合。tpo8

christina1949UID: 2992239

独立修改了，值得我学习
综合不知道为什么打不开，我的word还因此中毒了，很多文件都打不开···

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.13独立

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.13综合   TPO19

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

各位，怎么会我的文件下下来是乱码呢？？  千万不要用迅雷下，直接点“文件另存为”好吧，我这次贴这吧。  综合tpo19

In the listening cast, a buzzer named Bill who is inquired by professor about the telephone service he uses in a marketing class refutes three viewpoints in the reading passages by his own experience.

Firstly, he is a buzzer, as well, a student in day time. In fact, he is paid to do this job, but different from other ordinary advertisements which are sometimes paid for lying to customers, he should use the product by himself first, if it is good, he should tell the truth, that is the reason that the company hired him. So in the reading passage, its point that "because buzzers are paid, so some incorrect information would be state" is been argued by this student.

Secondly, in the reading passage, it claims that people could believe all the words said by buzzer. Actually, the situation is just opposite. Bill said people would not buy product if they cannot answer customers' questions, such as the price and services.

Finally, Bill does not agree that buzzing could bring harmful impact in social relationship. If the buzzers are not sincere, they would be fired by company. He indicates that if anyone tries the product he buzzed, they would find it is good. In this way, people could put their trust in a stranger which could contribute to good social relationships.

郝郝同学UID: 3024925

In the listening cast, a buzzer named Bill who is inquired by professor about the telephone service he uses in a marketing class refutes three viewpoints in the reading passages by his own experience. " o$ ^, O' G: n/ P2 M$ w9 r

Firstly, he is a buzzer, as well, a student in day time. In fact, he is paid to do this job, but different from other ordinary advertisements which are sometimes paid for lying to customers, he should use the product by himself first,（断句） if it is good, he should tell the truth,（which） that is the reason that the company hired him. So in the reading passage, its point that "because buzzers are paid, so some incorrect information would be state" is been （has been）argued by this student.
9 C$ N9 g6 }8 o
Secondly, in the reading passage, it claims that people could believe all the words said by buzzer. Actually, the situation is just opposite. Bill said people would not buy product if they cannot answer customers' questions, such as the price and services.

Finally, Bill does not agree that buzzing could bring harmful impact in social relationship. If the buzzers are not sincere, they would be fired by company. He indicates that if anyone tries the product he buzzed, they would find it is good. In this way, people could put their trust in a stranger which could contribute to good social relationships.

作者写得很好，听力与阅读结合的也不错
有个别语法错误 请注意下 尽管考试时可能被忽略
我觉得你写的已经很不错了

水平有限 望见谅！祝取得好成绩！

jiangruiqianUID: 2838124

0413的作业改好了  寄托上传不了  QQ传给你了  查收

niehanmjUID: 3005699

改好了~~~~~

Yvaine198831UID: 2956487

4.13独立：
If child want to do well in school, parents should limit the hours of watching TV programs or movies.

Nowadays, people have more channels to get knowledge and resources than that in past. With increasingly development of electrical product, television plays an indispensable role in people’s daily life. But a controversial issue arouses that whether parents should limited children’s time on watching TV, as well whether watching television would influence school performance. Personally, I do not agree with parents who restrict their children in watching TV for three main reasons.

To begin with, watching TV programs could get diversified knowledge by visual images in comparison with that from class. Different with knowledge what is written in text book, TV program could exhibit a more powerful and fantasy world to children, which is more attracting to them. By the improvement of program quality, parents are no need to worry that children would be mislead by program’s content. In contrary, children could learn more knowledge in an interesting way rather than in school. Some children who watch TV and learn extra-curriculum content are usually regarded as talent and smartness, therefore they could do better in their lessons to keep honor. In this case, watching TV could contribute to better performance in school, which could not be restricted by parents.

Furthermore, those who are limited in watching TV are common in some rebellious characters which could be expressed in school performance. For example, children are restricted rights to watch TV as parents believe watching TV program would affect their behavior in study, they may be angry with their parents. Thus, their anger would be reflected in their lazy conduct in study. Even when they get unsatisfied performance in school, they refute their parents that because they did not get enough amusement and pleasure out of curriculum. We could find that restriction in watching TV may lead negative effect on children’s study.

Last but not least, watching TV could help adolescents relax and release pressure, therefore, after that they could get more energy and motivation in study. Moderate relaxation and rest are necessary to those students, especially in current high pressure mode of education. They do more likely require joy and amusement to release them from heavy study mission. Long-time study could result decline of concentration, watching TV program could efficient relax their brain and activate brain again.

All in all, I firmly claim that parents should not restrict children’s time on watching TV program for these above reasons. Because watching TV would not influence school performance, oppositely, sometimes enhance their enthusiasm to study.