翔子的作文贴

qianhuangUID: 2766587

6月1日 独立 修改

zjxdxokzzyUID: 3072531

6.2综合

hyliu1-08UID: 3063421

6月1日 综合

zjxdxokzzyUID: 3072531

6.8 综合+独立

qianhuangUID: 2766587

6月8日 综合没问题，写的很好。就不贴了。

zjxdxokzzyUID: 3072531

6.10独立

phoenix2011UID: 3077553

36# zjxdxokzzy

zhengxiao0312UID: 3099700

by zhengxiao0312 6.10 独立 by 翔子.doc (29 KB, 下载次数: 5)

2011-6-14 19:11:29 上传

下载次数: 5

zjxdxokzzyUID: 3072531

6.14综合

yuchenzUID: 2990824

[url=https://bbs.gter.net/redirect.php?goto=findpost&pid=1775276100&ptid=1262410]39#  zjxdxokzzy 我不懂怎么上传附件啊，谁告诉我。
In the reading passage, the author gives three possiblesolutions to address the decline of Torreya, which are all opposed by theprofessor.

First, contrary to the belief in the passage  that [YZ1]
reestablishingTorreya in its old location, the professor asserts that the location which itused to live has been changed greatly under the influence of global warming.The Flordia's water is draining and it is getting drier and drier, and it isn’tsuit for Torreya to grow anymore.
Second, the professor states that the idea about movingTorreya to  otherdifferent [YZ2]
locationis also not feasible by giving an instance of another tree, which has triedthis plan. When this tree was moved to a new condition, it spread quickly andkilled other plant species which are also endangered and let them into extinction.Hence, the professor believes that this idea cannot be a solution because ofthe bad outcome to the new environment, which contradicts the passage'sstatement.

Third, the passage states that it is also an option topreserve Torreya in research centers. However, the professor argues thatresearch  centers'environment [YZ3]
is not capable to resist diseases. Torreya needs large and diverse environmentto resist diseases to survive which the research centers cannot provide hencethe professor believes this is not a good solution, either.

As mentioned above, the professor the three solutionsprovided by the passage are all not so feasible.

  [YZ1] 这里的that使应该跟从句和。
这里我觉得你最后一句（it is not suit for Torreya to grow anymore）是结果，前面的“thesituation in the original location changed a lot”，“wateris draining”和“getting drier and drier”是原因，要不用because或者so什么的连接一下吧。
  [YZ2] Otherlocation = a different location 不要other different一起用
  [YZ3] 原文的意思不是这个环境不能抵御disease，而是这个实验室不能容纳足够多的数量的数，数量太少很容易使他们灭绝

zhengxiao0312UID: 3099700

tpo 18.doc (20.5 KB, 下载次数: 2)

2011-6-15 13:11:36 上传

下载次数: 2

zjxdxokzzyUID: 3072531

6.15独立

piggy.6408UID: 3101490

In the reading passage, the author gives three possible solutions to address the decline of Torreya, which are all opposed by the professor.

First, contrary to the belief in the passage that reestablishing Torreya in its old location, the professor asserts that the location which it used to live has been changed greatly under the influence of global warming. The Flordia's water is draining and it is getting drier and drier, and(改称so会不会好点，我觉得这个是因果关系) it isn’t suit for Torreya to grow anymore.

Second, the professor states that the idea about moving Torreya to other different location is also not feasible by giving an instance of another tree, which has tried this plan. When this tree was moved to a new condition,（有个高人这样改的,不是我 when moving to a new environment to a tree means,） it spread quickly and killed other plant species which are also endangered and let them into extinction. Hence, the professor believes that this idea cannot be a solution because of the bad outcome to the new environment, which contradicts the passage's statement.

Third, the passage states（换下，避免和上面一样,points out,） that it is also an option to preserve Torreya in research centers. However, the professor argues that research centers' environment is not capable to resist diseases. Torreya need large and diverse environment to resist diseases survive which the research centers cannot provide hence（改成,therefore） the professor believes this is not a good solution, either.

As mentioned above, the professor(去掉) the three solutions provided by the passage are all not so feasible.

我觉得写的不错，至少我没有发现什么问题。。有不对的地方你就告诉我哦。。嘿嘿

书小妞UID: 2852591

100130NA： Do you agree with the following statement? The government should support scientific research even if there’s no practical use.

Nowadays, science plays and （a）significant role in the development of society and it’s generally believed that the government should provide much financial support for scientific research which benefits people a lot. However, when it comes to whether the government should support scientific research with no practical use, people’s notions vary. From my perspective, I agree with the statement that the government should also allocate adequate funds to these researches though they seem to be of no practical use in a short term.

Scientific researches with immediately(immediate) result should obviously be a high priority because they benefit people in various areas.. For example, biotechnology research has been proven to help cure and prevent diseases; advances in medical technology make it possible (for people to enjoy the safer and cheaper treatments)to offer safer and less expensive treatments; genetics help(避免重复可以使用 be conductive to) prevent birth defects; advances in engineering improve the structure of buildings; and communication technology facilitates global peace and participation in democratic process. Hence, the government should pay great attention on such scientific researches.

However, this is not to say that researches whose benefit are less immediate or clear should be given lower priority. In fact, it is difficult to predict whether a scientific research will ultimately lead to a great contribution to society. For example, the space research, which explore other planets in the universe, dose not immediately address society’s pressing problems. Yet in the long term, it might be necessary for the survival of the whole human being that（去掉） to find another planet which suit for people to live. Indeed, the prevention of mankind’s extinction is the most significant contribution to our society.

Also, reluctant to finance less practical researches could have a harmful effect on efforts to explore new knowledge         and pursue innovation. More often or not, scientific advances are derived from bold attempts or cutting-edge ideas. Maybe these researches seem to be less practical and useless, but they may lead to great achievements. Take the development of computers for instance. When the first computer was about to develop, public opinion went against it, as most people saw nothing practical in computer research. However, computers change the way human society evolved and proved to be great avail in the long run.

In sum, never should we imply that research whose benefits are less practical is not worth pursuing and not deserved government’s financial support.
文章论证的很好，有点类似于GRE的作文，有一些词的重复使用，可以用别的词替换。我的语法也不是很好，第一次修改，说的不对还请见谅。