更新模板+推荐书籍6G12208G1400+我不是经验贴我是牢骚贴

苏梳眠UID: 2717864

哈哈~人类已经不能阻止华人了。。
我不是那个苏苏~
我是小苏~
LZ好好休息吧，回头给大家好好讲讲你的辛酸史，给后来人打打气~

travwindUID: 2878723

楼主性情中人
祝你好运～

hiyayooUID: 3132375

同样懒人一枚的飘~

zkfairytaleUID: 3091751

好强呀。
楼主认为作文到底重要吗？ 我身边很多1300+，1400+的人，他们的作文都是3.0呀。
还有个同学，就练了四五篇，居然也考了3.0

whiteoutUID: 2699068

相比之下我太自惭形秽了，遇到困难就想后退想躲避。
肯为梦想付出的太少，又怕失去得太多。
真心佩服LZ的坚持和一直向前的勇气，学习到了。

iftfishUID: 2780094

同裸考TOEFL 105，用同等水平裸考GRE，今天给出的V大概在480 正负50
看来这是一条等线。。。
因为只是需要有一个G成绩而考的，所以也没有机会为此拼命复习一次
LZ的生活其实很精彩哦
这样的一段经历，如果没有，怎么叫做青春嘛

hjq1990UID: 3118689

生命已经过去四分之一了，向楼主仰望

甜甜是美女UID: 3078838

BTW请问是什么书？ 1# patatojuice

patatojuiceUID: 2240790

15# 2ndpoet
加油！！！

patatojuiceUID: 2240790

23# hjq1990
这个这个。。。

patatojuiceUID: 2240790

21# 0513doudou
哇，我也叫豆子，不过是土豆。：）

patatojuiceUID: 2240790

22# iftfish
其实现在想想我连GRE成绩也不是必须，可能是为了逃避考更吓人的考试吧。谁知道呢。
不过这样说起来450-500确实可以看作一个基本水平的区间呢～瓦咔咔看到有人跟我一样裸考好开心～这次机考感觉比6G笔考舒服多了呢～
加油加油哇！

patatojuiceUID: 2240790

24# 甜甜是美女
虾米书啊？
老实说我除了红宝书和新东方大黄本有规律的做了以外，其它的都是有的没的那样看的呢。
恩，推荐的书的话咧：
1.要你命3000，学名《GRE核心词汇考法精析》
如果基础词汇量本身蛮好的，时间又不足的话，看这本书还是很快的。
另外，同学们可以用微博上面那个“GRE机器人”作为抽检的工具。
2.新东方大黄本
大黄本分为很多个部分，这个大家都知道。作文一直是我最弱的地方，虽然这次小T同学给我突击了很久（有2天呢！！！），不过估计也就是个4的水平。。。所以没有经验可以share。
其它的部分按照最后做模考题的正确率来讲，填空题部分，类比部分（其实现在变了题型我觉得还是老样子的类比，更简单了而已），都可以认真做大黄本，从头做到尾也不会花很多时间。另外，做大黄本对于复习单词，特别是巩固单词有很好的作用。
大黄本的数学部分大概做几篇就可以了，我觉得如果是理工科学生需要恢复感觉，蛮好在考前做个3篇，足以。因为就我考的2次GRE而言，数学都挺简单的。练习审题是关键。别看老美考的公式不难，但是出题方向诡谲，搞不好就掉沟里了。
阅读部分现在新题型出了，按照老的方法练习其实也没问题，无非就是用各种方式考察一个人的理解能力而已。不过这里我用到一本书觉得很好，推荐给大家。见下：
3.杨鹏长难句+陈向东GRE/GMAT/LSAT逻辑
长难句这本书的作用对于我来说很诡异的。老老实实从头到尾把GRE部分看了一遍，把所有难度大于4的句子，也就是难度在4+到5+的句子都背下来之后，再看长篇阅读（行数在35-40的段子），就见山不是山，见水不是水了。而且有些困难的文章，可以同学之间互相交流。如果你能把另一个人讲明白了，你肯定对于这篇文章就明白了。如果再有任何关于题目的问题，那么可能是考虑角度的原因。
说到考虑角度，昨天看管卫东老师的微博，上面说中国学生就是不肯放弃自己的阅读习惯。这点我深有感悟。很多时候是习惯阻碍了我们对于问题的快速渗透和理解。陈向东的这本逻辑书对于我来说，虽然只是看了前几十页，但是却是醍醐灌顶。他的方法让我很容易分析出自己的逻辑弱点。所有的问题最后归结起来都是逻辑的问题。因为我们分析问题思考问题的逻辑线条出了knot，所以才会有错题，有执迷不悔永远都错的题。
4.作文七宗罪
这是CD上GMAT的一个ARGUMENT大法。其实就是有个NB的前人把A能用到的逻辑错误归结出来了。我看得版本是按照“因/果/证”去把七宗罪分为三类。然后结合前些天尚友微博上转的一个“十小时备考AWA”来做了一套自己的模板。
实际考试的时候按照GMAT前人经验，我先把自己的模板用最快的速度敲上去，然后才开始审题，然后把题目中的逻辑错误挑出来几个为我所用，套进已经准备好的七宗罪模板中。哇啦，可以说这是我写过的最漂亮的一篇A呢！啊哈哈哈哈得意的笑啊～

本人的模板（木有知识产权，随便转随便用）：
AWA：
In the above passage the author made a conclusion that... His assumption was substantiated on the ground that A...  He further improves his analysis by B... , and provides that C... At first glance, his logic seems coherent and plausible. Nonetheless, after careful investigation, we can see undermining fallacies controverting his explanation. (51+30)

First of all,

Secondly,

In the end,

In conclusion, these reasonable doubts cast the author's hypothesis into unwarranted position. Supply additional information on..., weigh alternative explanation to..., if the author shall, and establish tenable causal relationship between * and *, he will lead us to a more convincing explanation. (42+30)



七宗罪（我是按照因果证顺序排列的）：
因：

Survey is doubtful:

Crucial details is missing about the number of people surveyed, as well as the number of people responded, therefore it is impossible to analyse the validity of this conclusion made above. To be specific, if there were ** people asked and only ** of them gave a response, the conclusion that...would be highly suspect and jeopardized.


Gratuitous assumptions:

The author cursorily draw his conclusion from gratuitous assumptions that... Nonetheless, there is no incontrovertible evidence in the text leading to this end. In fact, it is verisimilar for another explanation that... Hence the argument is made unwarranted, ruling no such possibility.  


The author partially grounded his conclusion on the assumption that B is all that necessary for A , implying that there is no applicable alternatives
to achieve A except B.  Nevertheless,
he provides no countenance that sustains this conclusion.  Though B contributes well to A, we can see alternative elements may function as well.


We can tell from common sense that there are a lot of factors , to name a few for example, such as *,*, would function as well as, maybe even better than *, to achieve A.


Insufficient sample:

The example provided in the passage does not logically sufficient support the author's conclusion, unless it has been demonstrated as a general and typical sample of all A. On the contrary, * may represent a small part of A, hence it's impossible to predict A, as a whole, will yield such result as well. Given this, we can see the conclusion made from this evidence is surely unwarranted.






果：

Non-causal relationship:

The author suggests that, from the concurrence of A and B(the positive/negative correlation between A and B), B contributes for the occurrence of A, committing the fallacy of over-simplification of causal relationship. However, temporal relationship does function as sole factor for A, as there may well exist other contributors as *, * and *. Unless ruling out these possible alternatives, it is hard for the author to build a coherent conclusion that..


Either-or choice (dilemma):

A and B were reasoned as dilemma choices in the passage and no compromise was offered. However we can see no exclusive reasons for this assumption. Based on universal experience, there must exist an alternative, possible from the mixture of both A and B, will function as well to yield the result. As long as other choices like this are not excluded, it will be utterly difficult for the author to sell his idea to anyone.


证：


False analogy:

The author mistakenly use A as an analogous to B in all parts, hence draw his fallacious conclusion, for the reason that A is made up of different aspects, and not every one of them is applicable to B. To list a few, * and * all contributes to A, yet not to B. It is clear that there are more of differences than that of similarities between A and B, thus no warranty for the analogy.  


All things are equal:

The author falsely assumed in the text that no background factors will change, the conditions will remain the same, no matter how different time and location would be. Unfortunately, we can see no sufficient evidence supporting this hypothesis. Existing conditions that took place * ago is untenable to represent a current that will remain unaffected in the future.

szmanutdUID: 2727152

版衫有你一份