关于Argument 79的一点看法

zwyf25UID: 3171366

13# 咖啡盐

结论引出的话就和15楼的童鞋差不多。
比如题目中：  A 观点  理由1 理由2
                   B 观点  理由3

那我的行文方式就是
开头：A 提出了什么观点，有什么理由；B提出了什么观点，有什么理由；

第一段：驳斥A的理由1
第二段：驳斥A的理由2
第三段：驳斥B的理由3

结论 想要决定到底谁是对的，应该BALABALA。。。

cakeluvUID: 2845409

zwyf25 发表于 2011-10-18 21:07
13# 咖啡盐  

结论引出的话就和15楼的童鞋差不多。

我赞同这个。
因为题目特别强调了editorial，所以很有可能是说，编辑希望保留杂志惯有风格，出于专业考虑。

cakeluvUID: 2845409

75
The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men.  Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducation, the president argues that coeducation would lead to a significant increase in applications and enrollment.    However, the director of the alumnae association opposes the plan. Arguing that all-female education is essential to the very identity of the college, the director cites annual surveys of incoming students in which these students say that the school's all-female status was the primary reason they selected Grove. The director also points to a survey of Grove alumnae in which a majority of respondents strongly favored keeping the college all female.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
和这个是一个类型，我觉得这个类型的题可能就是要求都攻击。
而且有一个共同点，都是新政策和旧传统的冲突！
应该质问新政策的可行性，支撑新政策的论据。
然后质问旧传统是否贴切当下形式，是否应该继续保留。
结论，新政策需提供充足论据或者statistics analysis或者specific data去bolster the argument或者elimilate all the questions. Meanwhile 在没有充分说明旧传统应该被保留的情况下，作者的assumption is not convincible，

holydoraUID: 3348883

这个however 用的迷惑啊~~看了楼主的解说，顿时豁然开朗，就是正话反说的意思，千万不要理解错however……

好贴顶之，感谢楼主！！！