求助，问个PP2的短阅读的问题，谢谢了~！

k911865UID: 3049546

In early-twentieth-century England, it was fashionable to claim that only a completely new style of writing could address a world undergoing unprecedented transformation-just as one literary critic recently claimed that only the new "aesthetic of exploratory excess" can address a world undergoing.. well, you know. Yet in early-twentiethn-century England, T.S.Eliot, a man fascinated by the "presence" of the past, wrote the most innovative poetry of his time. The lesson for today's literary community seems obvious: a reorientation toward tradition would benefit writers no less than readers. But if our writers and critics indeed respect the novel's rich tradition(as they claim to), then why do they disdain the urge to tell an exciting story?

The author of the passage suggests that present-day readers would particularly benefit from which of the following changes on the part of present-day writers and critics?

A. An increased focus on the importance of engaging the audience in a narrative.

B. Modernization of the traditional novelistic elements already familiar to readers.

C. Embracing aspects of ficition that are generally peripheral to the interest of readers.

D. A greater recognition of how the tradition of the novel has changed over time.

E. A better understanding of how certain poets such as Eliot have influenced ficition of the present time.

答案是A,但是我想不通，难道是从最后一句话推出来的？







答案选1,3，为什么2不选呢？是因为during的问题？

k911865UID: 3049546

顶啊~~有人帮我解答下吗？

萝卜须根多UID: 3008387

第一题我没看出来。。。
第二题是你对句子的理解有误，那句子和选项2正好相反哦

k911865UID: 3049546

3# 萝卜须根多
额，我对那个句子的理解是：在洪水后，渔网抓住的鱼比洪水之前多一点，但是，这个不能说明本地鱼像前次的鱼（那些在上次更大的自然洪水中存活）一样开始繁荣了。
这样理解不对？那么该怎么理解呢？
我看了那句后面有个survive，所以说明了是洪水以后，不是during？

还有，我想问下，划线句的trout指的是本地鱼还是外地鱼。上面有个nonnative trout, 这两个不是同一种类？

NormanWuUID: 2659292

文章是不是说如果回归传统的话会对大家都好？“a reorientation toward tradition would benefit writers no less than readers.” 这个部分简单，就作为基本条件
然后最后一句确实要紧，如果真的回归传统“why do they disdain the urge to tell an exciting story” 潜台词传统就是 tell an exciting story
LZ没说自己想选哪个，那我就错的都分析一下
B. Modernization of the traditional novelistic elements already familiar to readers.
更加现代，肯定不对哈

3  Embracing aspects of ficition that are generally peripheral to the interest of readers.
加强读者普遍不关心的部分。。。不搭边

D. A greater recognition of how the tradition of the novel has changed over time.
深入小说传统的变化方式。。。。不搭边。。

E. A better understanding of how certain poets such as Eliot have influenced ficition of the present time.
研究像大E那种人是怎么影响他那个当代的。也不是回归传统啊。。应该是回归传统，而不是研究传统是怎么被影响的

第二题，为什么要关注那句话呀。。。文章中有没有说1983年的洪水造成本地鱼量的变化啦？没有嘛。。。实验归实验，survived many larger flood那也不一定就包括1983的洪水对不对？毕竟不是infer，只是according，没有说的就是没有说吧。个人看法，静等高人拍砖

sagisoloUID: 2720349

第一篇就是在最后两句话。

文章大概就是说有人说新时代需要新文学形式，然而不是的。

比如以前那谁TSE就写了首 诗（猜想是对应旧文学形式）

所以推理出现在也不应该鄙视 小说（猜想也是对应旧文学形式）

novel, tell a story & narrative都是一个意思吧，所以感觉也只有A靠谱一点。

sagisoloUID: 2720349

第二篇你画出来那句话的意思是说，网住了比正常多一点的trout但是这没有表明有显著的flushing of native fish。而毕竟after all，这种native fish已经survive 过去的 许多更大的洪水了（潜台词可能是说显然他们是一直都具有避免flushing of native fish伤害他们的能力）。

k911865UID: 3049546

5# NormanWu 恩，明白了，呵呵~谢谢了~:）

k911865UID: 3049546

7# sagisolo 是我句子理解错了，“after all" 这部分的句子我没理解对~谢谢了！:）