issue172

mengliwangUID: 137853

Important truths begin as outrageous , or at least uncomfortable , attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time.

From free falling theory to relative theory , from evolution theory to that time and space are only relative concept , almost all truths begin as strange, uncomfortable even outrageous for so many reasons including objective ones as well as subjective ones. They attacks upon the accepted wisdom, neglected the popular authority  .However , they ultimately were accepted .
On one hand , as far as the objective reasons are concerned , since they are truths , to some extent  they are predict and anticipated , which surpass the normal persons' rang of understanding, therefore , it is reasonable that many people consider the truths as uncomfortable even outrageous. Especially when it comes to the pure science  theory which is composed with some complex and puzzling formula which is a hot iron even for some specialists The relative theory is a fitting example : E equals m and square C.Although it seems easy and unimaginable , it is hard even impossible to improve it through the deduce or induce in mathematics and physics for some scientist except Einstein himself. Therefore it is no wonder that when Einstein put up his theory , almost all common scientists jeered and said he must be crazy. So taking into this consideration , we can safely conclude that  it is not unreasonable at all that truths begin as strange even outrageous.
On the other hand , as far as the subjective reasons are concerned , it is human nature to remain their accustomed habits , views , ideology , therefore once someone wants to change them, it is inevitable to cause some opposite . Common senses tell us that we are so
emotional that even the contemporary can not evolve it .Hawking one of the greatest physicist of our time is a classical example. when he overcome every obstacle and put up his  theory about black hole and then conclude the god is not existing at all. Being accustomed to her belief and still embrace by god , his wife Jane regarded him as uncomfortable. For this reason (of course including others) Jane divorced with Hawking. This example just illustrates that emotion is an important and sometime horrible factor when we are challenged to change ourselves and accept the new truths.
However the truths can survive even thrive from the bias and emotions of the people at that time , and ultimately were accepted and used . We can easily reach this conclusion without going to far. Free falling , relative theory , quantity theory and so on are accepted and popular. In fact as a new things to emergent , it has huge strength to break through the limitation and restraint of old things , which is a classical theory of philosophy about the key character of new things distinct from the old ones. Therefore , in the society level  it is this supplement and replacement that spur the advance of the society.
In sum , due to the analysis and reasons mentioned above , which sometimes interwine to form an organic whole an thus become more persuasive than anyone of them , we can conclude that although at the beginning the truth would suffer the supplant however it will ultimately survive and thrive.

paisleyUID: 64183

请说一下作文的来源

amy80UID: 4523

估计是他自己写的，为吸引别人的眼球用了这么一个搞笑的标题哦，呵呵。

mengliwangUID: 137853

最初由 paisley 发布
[B]请说一下作文的来源 [/B]

斑竹说清点　是太好了　不甘相信是小女子执笔　还是．．．．
真的　感觉这片不错　来点评价

paisleyUID: 64183

“说清点”是什么意思？

任何文章，如果不是原创，就要注明原作者和出处，这是寄托一向的氛围。不管是哪个版面的文章，要求网友尽量做到这一点，这是我的责任。

再说你的文章标题很含混，如果只是为了让大家见习一下优秀作文，那我想我的确没有什么必要看了。我已经考过了。如果是希望有人来改改，那就应该明确说出来。

wzggzwUID: 138370

issue要讨论的是important facts刚出现的时候是否让人愤怒和不安的（原因？），是否会攻击原有的wisdom（原因）？
我个人觉得没必要讨论“真理最后能消除偏见而胜出”这一论点，似乎过头了。题目都指明了是important facts。重点还是应该放在important facts和accepted wisdom之间的这种对立关系及原因吧？
However the truths can survive even thrive from the bias and emotions of the people at that time , and ultimately were accepted and used . We can easily reach this conclusion without going to far. Free falling , relative theory , quantity theory and so on are accepted and popular. In fact as a new things to emergent , it has huge strength to break through the limitation and restraint of old things , which is a classical theory of philosophy about the key character of new things distinct from the old ones. Therefore , in the society level it is this supplement and replacement that spur the advance of the society.

xbdebbUID: 142129

我觉的　既然是两者的关系，　当然的分出个胜负来，嘿嘿
当然，楼上的也不无道理！　
看看你的　

wzggzwUID: 138370

但是题目本身的意思好像不倾向于这个

NickFranck1980UID: 131870

观后感:
1.        文章没有一个中心论点, 作者应该明确自己的观点
2.        文章的结构虽然很清晰,但是设计有一些不合理 , 应该有明确的 : 论点,论据,理由,辩护,反驳和让步. 并且合理的安排这些因素
3.        尽量做到 句式多样化
4.        ISSUE的题目应该是一个有争议的问题,需在文章开头部分表明作者的立场和态度
5.        我个人认为应该把论证立足于让读者明白:  科学不是“既然我们知道大自然无法如此运行,它怎么会标现出这种运行方式”这种思维方式, 而应该是 “如果大自然就如我们所觉察到的那样运行,那么它会是什么样子”

个人意见, 仅供参考