【NINE小组】第九次作业——by me

gengshuUID: 3012360

Nations should suspend government funding for the artswhen significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.

The speaker indicates that whensignificant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed, the notionshould suspend the government funding for the arts. I fundamentally agree withthe speaker’s opinion. But the government should also consider their country'scircumstance. When not so many citizens are hungry or unemployed , develop thearts may have good effect on their citizens.

When most of their citizens are in thecircumstance of extreme hungry or unemployed, it perhaps, even cruel for thegovernment to invest too much money on arts. The government should focus onresolving their citizens' hungry or unemployed first and foremost. For example,the Zimbabwe may be one of the poorest countries in Africa. The country's rateof inflation is about 1000 percent. People in this country have some money butcannot afford almost anything. A lot of citizens are hungry or unemployed. Forthis circumstance, the government of this country should focus on resolving theinflation first rather than funding for the arts. Even if the government investto developing arts ,maybe no citizens can afford them so that cannot makecitizens live a better life. In this extreme circumstance, the governmentshould suspend funding for arts properly.

But in sometimes funding for arts may have good effect onresolving the problem such as famine or unemployment. It will not only canincrease the employment and improve the living standard of citizens but alsocan stimulate other industries. Take Egypt as an example. Egypt has a longhistory and rich culture. It is superiority for this country to develop artsbecause there are a lot of ancient fresco resources. Egypt take advantage of theirart resources to develop their tourism. This industry not only partly resolvesthe unemployment but also bring Egypt a large number of wealth. So if a countryhave some culture foundations like Egypt, fund for arts is necessary.

In conclusion, the government should consider theircountry's condition comprehensively then they can choose to funding arts ornot.

gengshuUID: 3012360

好吧.....issue传晚了导致没人改

gengshuUID: 3012360

In this argument,the author indicates that the arctic deer's being unable to follow theirage-old migration patterns across the frozen sea cause the decline in deerpopulations. Although this argument might seem reasonable at first glance,there are some specific evidence is needed to sustain it.

First of all, noevidence convince that the arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arcticregions cannot migrate from island to island like before. If the ice coveredthe sea still exist in some time of a year, they still can search for food bymoving on ice from island to island. Even though the road of ice may disappear,they can also choose other method to migrate. For example, maybe the seaseparating from the islands is very shallow, the arctic deer can just gothrough this shallow water easily. It is also very likely that this deer isgood at swim and they can swim across the sea between the islands to search forfood. The author's opinion is definitely flawed unless he can convince me thatthese and other possibilities are unlikely.

Besides, theauthor does not supply any evidence to confirm that there are somecause-and-effect relationships between the decline in deer populations and theglobal warming.  Although the global warming may cause thetemperature of the islands which the deer live decline relatively, it is quitepossible that there also exist some time in a year that the weather is coldenough for the deer to live and the plants on these islands can still alive andenough for these deer to eat. And the change which the global warming brings maynot influence the life of the deer itself. Without accounting for these andother alternatives, the author cannot bolster the recommendation.

Furthermore, theauthor fails to set and evidence that the report of the local hunters have anyreliance. The hunter may just go out for hunting little time of a year andtheir experience cannot use for show the number of the deer populations havedeclined. We need more statistics which record the number of deer populationscomprehensively. Besides, it is just possible that the deer change theirhabitats so that the local hunters see the deer not so frequently like before.To reach the cited conclusion, the arguer must explain either why none of thesealternatives is available.

To sum up, theauthor's argument mentioned above is not based on valid evidence. In order todraw a better conclusion, the author should take more evidence to sustain hisargument.

ashtray_sUID: 3008202

In this argument, the author indicates that the arctic deer's being unable to follow their age-old migration patterns across the frozen sea cause the decline in deer populations. Although this argument might seem reasonable at first glance, there are some specific evidence is needed to sustain it.(there are去掉)

First of all, no evidence convince（indicates） that the arctic deer live（living） on islands in Canada's arctic regions cannot migrate from island to island like before. If the ice covered the sea still exist in some time of a year, they still can search for food by moving on ice from island to island. Even though（even if吧？） the road of ice may disappear, they can also choose other method（s） to migrate. For example, maybe the sea separating from the islands is very shallow, the arctic deer can just go through this shallow water easily. It is also very likely that this deer is good at swim（swimming） and they can swim across the sea between the islands to search for food. The author's opinion is definitely flawed unless he can convince me that these and other possibilities are unlikely.

Besides, the author does not supply any evidence to confirm that there are some cause-and-effect relationships between the decline in deer populations and the global warming.  Although the global warming may cause the temperature of the islands which(where) the deer live decline relatively, it is quite possible that there also exist(there is also) some time in a year that the weather is cold enough for the deer to live and the plants on these islands can still alive and enough for these deer to eat. And the change which the global warming brings may not influence the life of the deer itself. Without accounting for these and other alternatives, the author cannot bolster the recommendation.

Furthermore, the author fails to set and evidence that the report of the local hunters have any reliance. The hunter may just go out for hunting little（less） time of a year and their experience cannot use for show the number of the deer populations have declined. （这句子汉化思维有点明显诶，有语病••）We need more statistics which record the（直接statistics about the number就可以了） number of deer populations(population都不应该加复数的) comprehensively. Besides, it is just possible that the deer change their habitats so that the local hunters see the deer not so frequently like before. To reach the cited conclusion, the arguer must explain either why none of these alternatives is available.（其实我个人觉得， 根据这个Instruction的话，写的时候可以写些具体evidence，比如说作者应该调查猎人观察的范围，弄清楚鹿在整个区域的数量变化，之类的）

To sum up, the author's argument mentioned above is not based on valid evidence. In order to draw a better conclusion, the author should take more evidence to sustain his argument.

qiuqiuyeUID: 3123106

我想问问，那种claim-reason的题目怎么写呢？有没有特殊注意的地方？