【NINE小组】第十四次作业-by wywcgs

wywcgsUID: 2565269

几天没写觉得又有点不在状态了，写得应该很烂……

Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

-------------------------------------

The problem that whether the society should spend many resources to save rare plant or animal species is a controversial one. Someone claims that the society should do its best to save them without considering the cost, while the others believe that it is not necessary to spend resources to save them. In my point of view, both of two statements are reasonable under some specific circumstances after considering the reason of their extinction and their value to human beings.

Society is responsible to spend many resources to save the species if their extinction is the result of nature damage led by human being’s activity. The protection to these species is a compensation of the damage to the environment, which is also benefit to human beings ourselves. Wo-long natural protecting zone, an area being protected from all human’s damage by Chinese government, is a good example. The destruction of valuable species’ habitats dues to the economic development and the exploiting to nature of China. In order to protect these species, Chinese government found the Wo-long natural protecting zone. Though much expense is cost to maintain this zone every year, many rare species are successfully saved there. People can visit this zone to see the beauty of nature which disappeared in modern city, and biology research on these species is also benefit by it. In this aspect, it is wise to found this zone to protect such species.

One the other hand, when the extinction of species dues to their inadaptability to nature, people should consider whether it is valuable for society to cost much to save it. For instances, panda is a kind of animal lived in ancient earth whose rarity is the outgrowth of being eliminated by nature. But it only appears in China, which is treated by government as the treasure of China. In order to show our friendship, sometimes Chinese government would give a panda to foreign countries as a present. It has a special meaning to Chinese, so government treats then well, despite the cost is very much.

In contrast, if the superseded animals prove little value to society, it may be a good choice that we didn’t take much effort to save them. According to a research, many species of animals and plants die out every day because of their inadaptability. But few of us think it as an emergency event to protect these species. It’s because we don’t know whether they would be benefit to us if they were saved. Due to the limitation of resources, we prefer spending them on solving more realistic problem to that on a field of few payoffs. In this case, don’t spend much on these species is good for society.

To sum up, whether we should save rare species is a complicated problem without general answers. We should consider the affect and payoff before deciding whether to save them or not.

amber_cUID: 3131341

The problem that whether the society should spend many resources to save rare plant or animal species is a controversial one. Someone claims that the society should do its best to save them without considering the cost, while the others believe that it is not necessary to spend resources to save them. In my point of view, both of two statements are reasonable under some specific circumstances after considering the reason of their extinction and their value to human beings.
与reason & value 有关。提到了双方观点，明确提出自己观点。
Society is responsible to（记得固定用法是be responsible for） spend many resources to save the species if their extinction is the result of nature damage (? 是要说自然还是人为？)led by human being’s （beings’）activity. The protection to these species is a compensation of the damage to the environment, which is also benefit to human beings ourselves. Wo-long natural protecting zone, an area being protected from all human’s damage by Chinese government, is a good example. The destruction of valuable species’ habitats dues to the economic development and the exploiting to nature of China.(缺谓语) In order to protect these species, Chinese government found（has founded） the Wo-long natural protecting zone. Though much expense is cost to maintain this zone every year, many rare species are successfully saved there. People can visit this zone to see the beauty of nature which(has) disappeared in modern city, and biology research on these species is also benefit by it（主动or 被动？）. In this aspect, it is wise to found this zone to protect such species.
拯救稀有动物是人类的责任，也对人类有利。
One the other hand, when the extinction of species dues to their inadaptability to nature, people should consider whether it is valuable for society to cost much to save it. For instances, panda is a kind of animal lived in ancient earth whose rarity is the outgrowth of being eliminated by nature. But it only appears in China, which is treated by government as the treasure of China. In order to show our friendship, sometimes Chinese government would give a panda to foreign countries as a present. It has a special meaning to Chinese, so government treats then well, despite the cost is very much.
对部分物种，视其价值而定。举了熊猫的例子，对中国很重要，所以值得。
In contrast, if the superseded animals prove little value to society, it may be a good choice that we didn’t （do not）take much effort to save them. According to a research, many species of animals and plants die out every day because of their inadaptability. But few of us think it as an emergency event to protect these species. It’s (It is) because we don’t know whether they would be benefit to us if they were saved. Due to the limitation of resources, we prefer spending them on solving more realistic problem (problems) to that on a field of few payoffs. In this case, don’t spend much on these species is good for society. (这句话有两个谓语哦)
对于一些对人类不利的物种，不值得花费大量资源。这一段感觉说服力不够。前面说的是许多物种死于不适应，后面提到的是人类不清楚它们对自己是否有利。这一段的TS应该是首句，就是它们对人类没有什么价值的时候，人类就不用花那么大的代价保护它们。但感觉后面的论证说理不太足够。
To sum up, whether we should save rare species is a complicated problem without general answers. We should consider the affect and payoff before deciding whether to save them or not.
个人观点，欢迎讨论~

这格式让我想死了~乌鸦见谅