[题目研讨] 单独题目：145 [复制链接]

popwang521
UID: 66406

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 466
注册时间: 2002-2-20
精华: 0
帖子: 1

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2003-8-13 15:51:10 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

“A crucial test of character is whether one is able to adapt to changing social conventions without sacrificing one's principles."

0 0

使用道具举报

雨&彩虹
UID: 132532

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 0
寄托币: 719
注册时间: 2003-4-21
精华: 1
帖子: 0

沙发

发表于 2003-8-13 16:19:30 |只看该作者

the above cliam has its merits in political field since any leader who aim at effecitve leadership has to adapt to the changing socail convention whille bearing in mind his own political goal and senario he hopes to see.

while in the arena of natual science, this claim would hardly find sufficient evidence since the public awareness or even the changin social convention may lag behind what scientist perceive about the soceity. thiis is the reason why in history, so many scientists were prosecuted for the sake of sticking firmly to their own principle.

in the area of artistic creation, artistis usually goes against social convention and mediate in their own world of originality and creativity because what they focus on is to cultivate beauty and aesthetic appreciaion out of their works of arts.

the last point is that in our daily life, we need to cater to certain social convention since each of us act as an organic of the whole social fabric .

the above points are what i am thinking of. you may choose certain aspects to develop your own argument.

good luck

双非DIY美硕申请总结

使用道具举报

imong
UID: 140258

永久会员

Rank: 16

声望: 266
寄托币: 22475
注册时间: 2003-7-14
精华: 88
帖子: 188

板凳

发表于 2003-8-13 16:28:07 |只看该作者

rainbow的理解有点偏吧，人家只是说a crucial test of character is，而不是说test出来的结果说明什么……，所以你的关于natural science的那一点我很难同意，主要因为离题太远了。至少也是先同意是一种crucial test，然后说明how crucial，举例子，sacrifice的怎么怎么样，keep one's own principle的怎么怎么样。然后说明有规律性，可以作为test or criterion，以支持title statement。

Rien de réel ne peut être menacé.
Rien d'irréel n'existe.

使用道具举报