issue161

glidingshUID: 110700

161"In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible
for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone
who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."

Is it no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero in this age of intensive media coverage? And is the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished? Just as the speaker asserts. I agree with the speak with the following reasons.  

With the invention of the television, our lives have changed greatly. The new policy and other information are known mostly through the media. But in today's life, most media are all controlled by the corporation or the government, and the media, of course, must work for the shareholders for the maxi-profit. How to make the maxi-profit, the answer is that to attract the eyes of people. Therefore, the media do their best to cater to the taste of the human and the media know the human nature--people are likely to intention on these who have succeed or who seem live more interesting than us--well; so the media always focus on these people, such as succeed businessmen, effective politicians, and famous stars. As human beings, people like to see someone get his or her power, but more want to watch them lose it. There are many examples for this view, Clinton's sexual scandal news; people more interest to talk his scandal than his effective policy. Another example is that Nixon, the famous WaterGate drew him down form the president, and today people still talk about his mistakes instead of his contribution for the US. Through everyone has shortcomings, as we know, so of course media will let them light and his or her reputation diminishing.

Admittedly, I must concede that sometimes media may give some reports to improve his or her reputation, such as the inversion for the school, helping the challenging physical peoples and so on--which is good for one's reputation, of course. But all of those reports are all work for the government or for some corporation. For example, the government want to enhance citizens' stimulation, and the most effective way is that giving people some information about it the through media, or the corporations want to improve their reputations; so they buy some time in the programmer or the page in the magazines or newspaper. All of which are game of the business and the politics.

In sum, maybe sometimes media can improve one's reputation for some special purposes. I still agree with the speaker that media can diminish anyone's reputation in this age because that people like to see someone stand on his or her power but more like to see they off their power.

木耳UID: 123036

1.And is the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished? Just as the speaker asserts
...diminished, just as the speaker asserts?

2. I agree with the speak with the following reasons.
    I agree with the speaker based the follswing reasons.

3.第二段开头罗素，没有明显主题句

4.people more interest to talk his scandal
   people are more intersted in talking about his scandal

5.Through everyone has shortcomings, as we know, so of course media will let them light and his or her reputation diminishing.
through or though? And  "so"  must be ersed

先挑这么多。逻辑不是很清晰，建议多读牛人的文章
3.5--4.0

lubritiaUID: 141474

本文结构
支持
1.媒体让很多人名声扫地
2.媒体提高人的声誉只是经济或政治上的手段
结尾重述
个人意见:
开头差一些,不过我也不知道怎么写开头,不是缺少分析,就是把后边论述的东西夹道开头,然后后边就没话说了.你这样也算可以了.
第二段对媒体得分题比较好.第三段让步不错,我要学习!但是让步之后说得过于绝对了,把all换乘most好些.结尾有些仓促
参考提纲:
Agree: 小谈一下媒体,现在的没提如何如何怎样怎样.媒体对每个问题,尤其是个人隐私追踪报道.现在已不存在英雄了
1.        一般人们会把公众人物作为自己的崇拜对象,但是一般来说,他们可能在很多方面有缺点,而公众人物的各个方面都是媒体关注的对象,而人们头脑中的英雄形象是不容玷污的,因此,他们的reputation和容易被一点无关紧要的小事情抹煞.Clinton?
2.        媒体经常为追求经济利益而制造虚假新闻,会使reputation diminish. ex?
3.        即使后来被人们证明媒体所说并非属实,那 “hero”在人们心中的地位也无法向以前一样

feier521UID: 109747

161"In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."

Is it no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero in this age of intensive media coverage? And is the reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished? Just as the speaker asserts, I agree with the speak(speaker) with(for) the following reasons.

With the invention of the television（电视不能代表整个media）, our lives have changed greatly. The new policy and other information are known mostly（？） through the media. But in today's life, most media are all controlled by the corporation or the government(这一句有什么用？), and the media, of course, must work for the shareholders for the maxi-profit(??maximum profit). How to make the maxi-profit, the answer is (that删掉) to attract the eyes of people. Therefore, the media do their best to cater to the taste of the human and （the media改为to） know the human nature--people are likely to intention（名词 pay attention） on these who have succeed or who seem live(whose live seems) more interesting than us--well; So the media always focus on these people, such as succeed (successful) businessmen, effective politicians, and famous stars. (As human beings多余), people like to see someone get his or her power, but more（most） want to watch them lose it. There are many examples for this view, Clinton's sexual scandal news; people more interest to（are more interested to） talk his scandal than his effective policy. Another example is that Nixon, the famous Watergate drew him down form（from） the president, and today people still talk about his mistakes instead of his contribution for the US. Through everyone has shortcomings, as we know, so of course media will let them light（？） and his or her reputation diminishing.

Admittedly, I must concede that sometimes media may give some reports to improve his or her（?指代不清） reputation, such as the inversion（？） for the school, helping the challenging physical peoples（physical challenged people） and so on--which is good for one's reputation, of course. But all (?太绝对了，你前面的让步，不就白写了吗？)of those reports (are all删掉) work for the government or for some corporation(s). For example, the government want to enhance citizens' stimulation（？？）, and the most effective way is that giving people some information about it the through media（这一句太乱了，the most effective way is to give people some information through media）, or the corporations want to improve their reputations; so they buy（？别扭） some time in the programmer(programs) or the page in the magazines or newspaper. All of which are game of the business and the politics.（公司和政府占用节目时间和杂志页面怎么diminish people’s reputation？这不是矛盾吗？再说题目是说人的：hero 和公司和政府无关）

In sum, maybe sometimes media can improve one's reputation for some special purposes. I still agree with the speaker that media can diminish anyone's（绝对） reputation in this age because （that删掉） people like to see someone stand on his or her power but more like to see they off their power.
好多语法错误啊，加油！！！

glidingshUID: 110700

谢谢木耳， 我写作的时候还是写写就不知道写到哪里去了，唉
逻辑还是不清阿
to lubritia   开头和结尾就是模板， 看来我要从新选了 ；谢谢提醒

可爱的feier521，谢谢
我还把文章检查了一遍，没有想到还是有这么多的错误，谢谢花时间看
对于[电视不能代表整个media]：我可不可以写such as television, 做一个典型来分析
这句话：[most media are all controlled by the corporation or the government(这一句有什么用？), ]，我是想说，很多媒介都是掌握在公司或者是政府手里。这样表达对吗？
.------（公司和政府占用节目时间和杂志页面怎么diminish people’s reputation？这不是矛盾吗？再说题目是说人的：hero 和公司和政府无关）我是想说：公司和政府占用节目时间和杂志页面来提高自己的reputation,因为他们付money,只是media 赚钱就行-----是我表达太差了，唉这样考试完蛋了

feier521UID: 109747

161"In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished."

题目重点是在媒体的scrutiny下，“人”的名声diminish， “降低了”。
而你论述的是公司和和政府是如何提高reputation的。这只能是说媒体的作用不再使人们信任它了，其推崇的hero 可能也不值得信任。和hero 及人的reputation 好像无关。你在仔细体会体会题目意思。

glidingshUID: 110700

o……
好像有点偏题了 ，让偶好好看看
谢谢feier521

glidingshUID: 110700

我对题目的理解是
media时代不再有hero   因为media会diminish 他们
我同意作者的观点， media会diminish 他们，人们都喜欢看media 来diminish 他们 ，媒介为了盈利
但是 偶尔会improve their reputions 的报道，是因为个人花钱让media 这么做的。