36篇 阅读求教

wangnannan_1985UID: 2862388

EX 18
的第8题
At the Shadybrook dog kennel, all the adult animals were given a new medication designed to reduce a dog‘s risk of contracting a certain common infection. Several days after the medication was administered, most of the puppies of these dogs had elevated temperatures. Since raised body temperature is a side effect of this medication, the kennel owner hypothesized that the puppies‘ elevated temperatures resulted from the medication‘s being passed to them through their mothers‘ milk.


8. Which of the following, if true, provides the most support for the kennel owner‘s hypothesis?
(A) Some puppies have been given the new medication directly but have not suffered elevated temperatures as a side effect.
(B) The new medication has been well received by dog breeders as a safe and effective way of preventing the spread of certain common canine infections.
(C) None of the four puppies in the kennel who had been bottle-fed with formula had elevated temperatures.
(D) an elevated temperature is a side effect of a number of medications for dogs other than the new medication administered at the kennel.
(E) Elevated temperatures such as those suffered by most of the puppies in the kennel rarely have serious long-term effects on a puppy‘s health

答案是E  我感觉好像是B  求高人解答

另外我还感觉一些题 有点小出路
EX9-5
EX14-12
EX16-5
不知道大家是不是有同感

belmenUID: 3205783

答案是错了，不过正确答案是D
考完半个月都不知道当初是怎么做对的了囧，回去再想想

lijun585429UID: 2924013

答案B和E感觉都错了，
先来分析一下 题中说新药的目的是减少狗患某种普通感染的的风险，接着又说了这种药的副作用是使体温上升。狗的主人认为使狗体温上升的途径是通过母乳喂养(即乳汁）。
B选项的意思通过哺乳的方式，该新药阻止某种犬的感染是安全，有效的。
实际上哺乳是是体温上升的途径，也就是副作用的途径
E.选项属于过度推理。文中没有说幼犬的体温升高对其健康几乎没有严重，长期的影响。

wangnannan_1985UID: 2862388

我对B选项的理解是幼仔通过母乳的方式获取了新药，以至于他能抵御其它的狗犬流行病。所以这样更强的说明了幼仔发病是因为母亲的MILK而不是其它原因，所有我选择了B，是我对B选项的理解有问题？还请继续解答 1# wangnannan_1985

belmenUID: 3205783

原来做的时候选的D，后来纠正的正确答案也是D，现在来看怎么想怎么不对。刚查了下果然有人说真正的正确答案是C
文章说，明明没有给小狗崽打药，体温怎么会升高了呢？于是怀疑是喝了它们母亲的奶，奶里有药物成分。怎样说明是因为喝奶喝到了药物呢？C说用奶瓶喂的狗崽都没有出现体温上升的情况，而奶瓶里不会出现药物成分，这正能说明那些小狗的体温上升是由于母亲的奶里的药物成分造成的。问题要你证明的就是这一点，其他选项都没法推出这个结论。
你的确理解错B了，问题问的是药物的副作用（发烧），你以为问的是它的正作用（抵御疾病）了
有疑问继续说

wangnannan_1985UID: 2862388

恩 这样看 你说的C的确是有一些道理的，没母乳的没有问题，这样就说明了母乳的问题。我理解B的原因是因为通过B可以得出幼仔没有其它的得病途径，因此加强了是那个母乳传染的肯定性。想一想还是C说得准确些，没喝没有问题，喝了有问题，是母乳的问题，一个直接了当的逻辑。 5# belmen

watertcafeUID: 2999484

亲们~这道题目当初版内热烈讨论过，最后好像还是木有结果。大家各执一词，另外还有同学说新东方老师在上课时明确指出答案是E，但是老师的解释没能说服大家。
那啥……感觉阅读36套里面的逻辑题答案不靠谱的不是一两道~大家如果觉得迷惑可以绕道，或者去看陈向东老师的逻辑训练，然后再回头做题~