1.31

lovely_hippo123UID: 3209964

2.4-独立  写的不好，好晚  头好晕。。。求狠批
100619NA When people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others, some people prefer to use e-mail or text messaging, other like to use telephone or voice messaging. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.

Nowadays in the wake of advancement of technology, providing people with many avenues to communicate with people like e-mail, text messaging, telephone and voice messaging. While different methods have their own characteristic.

First and foremost, it is undeniable that e-mail and text messaging are relatively conserved way for people to express, since it provide longer time to prepare their word before sending. Thus it provides the people who do not well in expressing themselves with best opportunity to help those people to make a sound preparation before they actually know what they what to discuss about. Moreover the time it need to consider the word may also be the best way to extract individual’s attention, for example there are some individuals that their emotion changing quickly during a short period of time, for example in a second they may feel very frustrated and controversial, but next second their feeling just disappearing with the attraction of some other thing during the way of printing words. So if the there is a people who is introverted, reserved and it hard for them to well deliver their feeling in limited time then they can choose these way to discuss their sadness with other people

Furthermore, the ways like telephone and voice are tend to be more directly, those ways are suitable for the people who cannot bear the time-costing way to express themselves much less when they are feeling upsetting or controversial. Additionally those avenues are helping cultivating certain ability like how to express them in an efficient way which is of great necessary in modern time, since we always have to convey our emotion in a easier so we can be understood and make a quick reaction and when asked by others. So a vivacious people or the one who improve their performance in interpersonal, they can choose these methods to communicate with others when unhappy

Therefore, since the distinctive benefit of those methods, then people may choose which way to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with other people depends on their own characteristic and willing.

idealibtUID: 2667256

lovely_hippo123 20120205.doc (42 KB, 下载次数: 4)

2012-2-5 21:34:30 上传

下载次数: 4

loveinwcUID: 3241878

您的二月四日综合君。。。改晚了，真抱歉。。。


The reading passage indicates that "let it burn “policy should be replaced since it really do severe harm to forest, and he also take an example that severe damage have caused by fires(the fire) in Yellowstone in 1988 . However, lecturer disagree(少了个s) with such suggestion that fire actually plan(plays) an important role in the eco-system circle(cycle或者 the circle in ecosystem) of forest, the fire happen(少了ed) in Yellowstone is creative for certain reasons4 W( G" e0 J& f! ^5 p0 K- B4 c

First and foremost, according to the lecturer, after the fire of Yellowstone in 1988, there are replaced by（前后主语不一致，汗） many new plant, the fire provided many opportunity(复数撒) to the new plant（these new plants） which cannot survive ever(before), and lecturer also give two example（加s哟） to support his standpoint, （拆吧，已然两句话了。。）first， many smaller species which cannot exposed in high level（会误解滴没看过原文的人会以为这只害怕高温的说，改成which need certain high temperature to sprout 如何？） are now multiplied（ing）. And this opinion conflicts with the statement that many tree died out and many smaller tree being incinerated.(哪里有两个例子喵？)

Second, the professor further point(s) out that the fire let the forest more suitable for certain species such as web and bare(是兔子才对啊), and eventually contribute to the development of other animals which feed on these animals. On the contrary, (加个the reading says也好啊,不然单看这一句会混乱滴)the fire make the destruction of habitats and food chain finally make it little possible for animals to survived. d4 W  m$ ]/ e: z8 n6 f

Last but not least（这句很赞哇）, lecturer disagree（s） with the opinion that fire can make an negative effect on the tourist attraction(the attraction to tourists), since although(虽有连用时，好像从来只有反过来的汗了个汗汗汗) the fire make the forest messy but visitors can go to Yellowstone next year and each years after the fire.

在下水平不高，改得有限，汗，可能还有改错的地方呢，千万别纠结。。。
Ps 您貌似各种都少加s啊或者ed啊，喵。。。