ISSUE4...任何领域都要来自别的领域的知识。。。大家帮忙看看。。。

yellowchildrenUID: 134407

Issue 4
No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.

I strongly agree the assertion that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study. With the increasingly interwoven in knowledge of fields of any sorts, it is necessary that study in any field could gain success only by absorbing the knowledge and experience from any other's fields, which could be applied in the field including practical study and theoretical study.

Firstly, in the field of practical study there are many examples that one can understand the importance of outsiders. On the one hand, many practical studies are based on the knowledge in the field of theoretical study. For example, without the binary system in math it is difficult to image how the first computer in the world is made and how computer science could be come out. Besides, radioactivity is the starting point for cancer treatment and it is also the source of nuclear energy and atomic bomb. On the other hand, there are some studies themselves, which are compounded by the study of two related sciences. As an example of the study of biochemistry, which is tightly connected with the study of biology and chemistry. Either the advance in biology or in chemistry would necessarily impel the advance in biochemistry. With the development of society, the study like this would be more and more.

Secondly, it may be argue that in the field of theoretical study, due to the independence of knowledge in some field, people could make great progress in this field of study without knowledge and experience outside itself, such as physics and math. But the fact is not so. While physics is a relatively independent science, many mathematic methods would be necessarily used for computing and analyzing the data of physical experiments. The introduction of calculus contributes to the analysis of the movement of object whose speed is various, which widen extent that physics could study. Similarly, in the humanity science, archeology is indispensable to the study of history since the thing unearthed would conducive to the analysis and understanding of history for historian. Simply put, even for theoretical study, no area operates in a vacuum and we must understand the interplay among them.

Sum up, since things are always connected each other, there is not absolutely independent thing in the world and one thing always interact with other things in this or that way. Thus, one should be open to accept knowledge and experience outside the field in which one could be engaged.

yellowchildrenUID: 134407

写的挺烂的，主要是思路不对，好像不应该分什么理论研究和实际应用研究来说。。。后来也看了别人写的。。。不过改起来就是大改了，懒的改了，大家看看能不能这样写？？如果这样写实在不合适，我重写。。。

语言上也很贫乏，还请大家多提意见。。。

yellowchildrenUID: 134407

自己先顶一下吧。。。
可能是写的太烂，不屑狂批了。。。还是请大家狂批一下啊。。。

sue_zhUID: 78087

我觉得你分成实用和理论研究两段来写还算清楚,但是不知道是不是简单了一些.更复杂的我也想不出来.例子也不错.语言上有些小错,不过应该不要紧.

yellowchildrenUID: 134407

谢谢SUE-ZH了。。。22号就考了。。。现在才写了5\6篇。。。1篇A...每天只有下班了回家可以看和写，老觉得来不及了。。。郁闷ING...

请大家继续大大批评。。。

marshalUID: 142398

这个issue中的outsider是不是需要定义一下？

sue_zhUID: 78087

我也一样,天天上班,抽空写个作文看个书,一想到考试就冒冷汗,快得了考试综合症了.没事,一起努力,大不了考得烂一些了,只要尽力就好

alexandra8204UID: 138807

例子还都挺好的 但是语言上还是有小错误(跟我一样 检查起来真郁闷)
不知道为什么要分为理论和实际呢？而且谈的全是纯科学 不知道是不是有点单薄了
just some suggestion 今天正好也写到科技的这篇了 也觉得没太多东西说:(  开始只憋到390个字 郁闷死了 后来超时10分钟 又写多了 晕 在这儿也一并贴了 希望大家互相指点

In this technologically advanced society,every specific field of knowledge is highly interweaved with each other and thus they bulid a firm scientific  net.Just as some people proposed that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge to it.I strongly agree with this point that there is no single tributary in today's scientific and technological sea.

With the development of today's science and techonology,every specific field of study is getting more and more sophisticated and all of them are full of complexities.Let us take some examples to understand better,in today's high-tech field of genetic engneering,it is necessary of our scientists to postulate and caculate millions of kinds of figuration of those tiny genetic particles.In architecture field,we are striving to bulid much more complicated skyscrapers.In space travel field,voluminous amouts of caculations are needed to speculate the right orbits,the necessary speeds and also the super hi-tech space equipment cannot be ignored.Those problems are all really tough and the only way in which we can solve them is to bring about other fields' applications to these.For example,today's computer technologies are advanced enough to help us with the repetitive and awkward caculations about orbit speculation,countless genetic array caculation through some proper computer programs.Today's graphic programs and automation design are great contributors to architecture field.Also just those high-tech of biophysics and material applications are supporting for the high quality of space equipment.Those are just a few of thousands of examples we can call on and we can easily conclude from each one that every single field of study nowadays is interwinded.One cannot live without others and they make up the big scientific and technological family.

Moreover,in the art and literary field, the situation is about the same.How can we evaluate an ancient piece of art work?Just by some skills or something else?I am afraid if our critics do not have any knowledge about history,this task is hardly possibly justified.Also,in many fields about art and literature,a philosophical thinking is necessary to justify and evaluate those great masterpieces.For example,we cannot judge a picture merely by its appearance or personal feelings.We have to combine our evaluation with this artist's living situation,the historical environment at that time,the artistic trend during that days and maybe also his or her peers' impacts.Only with these elements drawed from other knowledge fields,we can make a more justified commentary and learn better from what we expect to know.

Just try to think about the situation in which we do our own field of research definitely separated from each other.Thousands of caculations and repetitive tasks we have to finish,totally trapped in one unsolved forever circle just by our specific strength,a large amount of biased judgment we may never know and for which we may quarrel with each other and etc.Everything is raveled in a huge chaos.What we continue to do is just a waste of time because we may be wrong since the first step of our caculations or evaluations.We need to help each other with different fields of knowldge that can equip ourselves better and help us out of these terrible circles.What's more,it gives birth to the great efficient advantages and it especially makes sense in this information time.

In sum,our study of all kinds is like a huge ocean.Every part of it you see is composed of thousands of drops from all around.You cannot separate any tiny drop.It is a complicated net and each element is interweaved with each other.There is no big distinction here but only overlaps.Everybody has to know the truth that no field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.What we can should do more is just to develop each technology and then it is possible to launch a much quicker ascent of the whole scientific and technological ladder.

yellowchildrenUID: 134407

MARSHAL: OUTSIDERS我理解就是本领域以外的吧，不知道是否需要再定义。。。

SUE-ZH: 谢谢。。。一起努力。。。

alexandra8204：可能我学理工科的原因吧，说的都是这方面的例子，而且一说STUDY\RESEARCH之类的词，我的第一反应就是做实验。。。挺奇怪的。。。：）。。。可能这样就的确局限了自己的思维。。。的确加写社会、人文类的会显得充实些，关键是字也能多了。。。：）
看了你的，感觉其它都还好吧，就是第四段有点空，不象谈需要别的领域的知识对本领域的重要，有点象谈听取别人意见的重要，另外，你的CIRCLES是不是象表达“漩涡”的意思？？是不是应该用EDDY比较好。。。不确定，本身我的用词就很烂，仅供参考，自己斟酌。。。呵呵。。。

alexandra8204UID: 138807

haha 我也是理工科的 每次什么都只想到电脑电话:) 所以也是憋了半天才想出来ART方面怎么加点进去 真痛苦:(
第四段是因为觉得字数太少 不写就没了 因为本来每次我结尾都是胡乱重复总结一下 从来不超过3行:p anyways 谢谢提醒 大家一起加油啊