求助一道36套里的ex36第一题~~thanks

jzc007UID: 3015278

An experiment conducted aboard Space Lab in 1983 was the first attempt to grow protein crystals in the low-gravity environment of space. That experiment is still cited as evidence that growing crystals in microgravity can increase crystal size: the authors reported that they grew lysozyme protein crystals 1,000 times larger than crystals grown in the same device on Earth. Unfortunately, the authors did not point out that their crystals were no larger than the average crystal grown using other, more standard techniques in an Earth laboratory. No research has yet produced results that could justify the enormous costs of producing crystals on a large scale in space. To get an unbiased view of the usefulness of microgravity crystal growth, crystals grown in space must be compared with the best crystals that have been grown with standard techniques on Earth.

1.It can be inferred from the passage that the author would find the Space Lab experiment more impressive if which of the following were true?
(A) The results of the Space Lab experiment could be
replicated in producing other kinds of crystals in
addition to lysozyme protein.
(B) The device used in the experiment produced larger
crystals on Earth than it did in space.
(C) The size of the crystals produced in the experiment
exceeded the size of crystals grown in
Earth laboratories using standard techniques.
(D)The cost of producing the crystals in space exceeded
that of producing them using standard laboratory
techniques.
(E) The standard techniques used in Earth laboratories
were modified in the Space Lab experiment due to the effects of microgravity.

我知道定位在这啊Unfortunately, the authors did not point out that their crystals were no larger than the average crystal grown using other, more standard techniques in an Earth laboratory.但是这句话取非不是就把前面的did not point去掉吗。。那不是no larger了这样和答案c相反啊 求解@@@

jzc007UID: 3015278

真心求解。。

jzc007UID: 3015278

白色米饭UID: 3331916

把 no larger 取非啊。。。

jzc007UID: 3015278

白色米饭 发表于 2012-7-22 21:40
把 no larger 取非啊。。。

我的理解是the author did not point out 取非啊。。求指正

白色米饭UID: 3331916

jzc007 发表于 2012-7-22 22:18
我的理解是the author did not point out 取非啊。。求指正

...你太萌了

jzc007UID: 3015278

白色米饭 发表于 2012-7-23 09:35
...你太萌了

真心求教。。哎

白色米饭UID: 3331916

jzc007 发表于 2012-7-23 10:05
真心求教。。哎

文章说the authors没有指出的是这些在太空中生长的crystals 并没有比在地球上用更先进的手段获得的crystals大。那么为了让这个微重力生长方法更impressive 当然是这些Micro-gravity的cyrstals 要比先进手段获得的都要大啊。 原来是小的， 假如是比它大，那么说明它很有用...清楚了吧..

jzc007UID: 3015278

白色米饭 发表于 2012-7-23 10:33
文章说the authors没有指出的是这些在太空中生长的crystals 并没有比在地球上用更先进的手段获得的crysta ...

我的逻辑是。。unfortunately, the author did not point out［这些东西］。所以为了让它更impressive，所以应该指出［这些东西］，而［这些东西］指的是：太空中的crystal没有比地球上用更标准技术获得的crystal更大。no larger也就是smaller，也就是太空中的crystal更小啊，但答案与之相反。我的逻辑观毁灭了。。

白色米饭UID: 3331916

jzc007 发表于 2012-7-23 13:54
我的逻辑是。。unfortunately, the author did not point out［这些东西］。所以为了让它更impressive，所 ...

孩子 你理解错了...你什么时候考啊