请教：OG阅读hard中的一个题

优氧深呼吸UID: 3213805

Many critics of Emily Brontë’s novel Wuthering Heights see its second part as a counter
point that comments on, if it does not reverse, the first part, where a romantic reading receives more confirmation. Seeing the two parts as a whole is encouraged by the novel’s sophisticated structure, revealed in its complex use of narrators and time shifts. Granted that the presence of these elements need not argue for an authorial awareness of novelistic construction comparable to that of Henry James, their presence does encourage attempts to unify the novel’s heterogeneous parts. However, any interpretation  that seeks to unify all of the novel’s diverse elements is bound to be somewhat  unconvincing. This is not because such an interpretation necessarily stiffens into a thesis  (although rigidity in any interpretation of this or of any novel is always a danger),  but because Wuthering Heights has recalcitrant elements of undeniable power that, ultimately,  resist inclusion in an all-encompassing interpretation. In this respect, Wuthering  Heights shares a feature of Hamlet.


The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that an interpretation
of a novel should
A not try to unite heterogeneous elements in the novel
B not be inflexible in its treatment of the elements in the novel
C not argue that the complex use of narrators or of time shifts indicates a
sophisticated structure
D concentrate on those recalcitrant elements of the novel that are outside
the novel’s main structure
E primarily consider those elements of novelistic construction of which the
author of the novel was aware

答案是B，OG上说由那句括号里面的话推断的。但我不太理解整个倒数第二句的逻辑结构。
虽然我觉得其他四个选项也有问题，但想不通B怎么是对的。
求分析。

zyj3166UID: 2928827

个人觉得 B对在了 INflexible=rigid

zhouyu123031UID: 3181463

但是任何力图将小说中所有元素统一起来的做法在某种程度上注定是无法令人信服的。A选项感觉错在太绝对，文中有somewhat, 问题问的作者最可能同意的观点。

这倒不是因为这样的一种解释必定会僵化成为一个命题(尽管对这部或任何一部小说的解释中，僵化死板总是一种危险)，而是因为《呼啸山庄》拥有一些极难驾御的因素，以其无可辩驳的力度，最终拒绝被囿于一个囊括无遗的解释中。

句子逻辑个人意见：主线是把所有元素统一的做法可能不太好，主要是因为呼啸山庄有些很纠结的东西没法被搞进一个统一的解释里。副线是这个做法不好的原因并不是会僵化为一个thesis,尽管对任何小说僵化死板的解释都不好。
我赶脚用人话来说就是= =真正原因是无法用一个解释来概括呼啸山庄，而不是概括了之后会僵化主题。

另外对于B选项   rigidity是always a danger , inflexible就是同义改写。not inlexible就是作者的想法了。

优氧深呼吸UID: 3213805

zhouyu123031 发表于 2012-8-4 12:36
但是任何力图将小说中所有元素统一起来的做法在某种程度上注定是无法令人信服的。A选项感觉错在太绝对，文中 ...

谢谢这么详细的回复。
今天看了你的解析，又分析了一下，大概弄懂了。
之前总觉得题目应该要对这句话的主线出题。所以一直很纠结答案怎么可能是这个。哎，原来确实是对副线出了。。。

zhouyu123031UID: 3181463

优氧深呼吸 发表于 2012-8-5 09:05
谢谢这么详细的回复。
今天看了你的解析，又分析了一下，大概弄懂了。
之前总觉得题目应该要对这句话的 ...

哈我做这篇时也是纠结死了= = 这种评论性的人文文章从头到尾都不会说人话。。