ISSUE165 高频题啊，进来看看我写的吧！！！！

DoDoqiangUID：154933

165. “In any given field, the leading voices come from people who are motivated not by conviction but by the desire to present opinions and ideas that different from those held by the majority.”


According to the speaker, the leaders in any field are such people who desire to present some novel opinions and ideas which are different from the majority. Although I concede that some significant breakthroughs in the fields of both natural science and humanities do be made by people whose concepts or theories are totally unique, it is not the desire to be differentiated from the majority but the purpose of pursuing the truth that motivates those people who make leading voices. The speaker’s assertion is also too extreme and misleading in some sense, which I strongly disagree.

First, the speaker fails to consider some fields in which without support from the majority no one could be an opinion leader. Take political realm for instance. If a politician’s ideas and allegations are not accepted by the mass, how could he become a real leader? On the contrary, sometimes, it is not politicians’ unique ideas but their endeavors to accord to the popular opinions that make candidate succeed in vote. For example, if at present a politician still suggested to build a Utopia, which has no similarity with any current society, his allegation would definitely fail, no mentioned that would be a leading voice.

On the other hand, it is also ridiculous in scientific community to think that a scientist purposes a new theory simply in order to show his idea differs from those held by the majority. Admittedly, there are plenty of preeminent researchers earn their academic reputation by presenting original and creative theories, which are totally different from the old ones. Yet, their achievements are all on the base of established laws and theory systems. And what motivated them to be the leader in those fields is the desire for truth not for specializing themselves. If Bruno advocated the Heliocentric Model just for the purpose of differentiating himself from others, how could he stick to his theory so toughly that till he was sentenced and burned in the Roma Square by the Holy Office, he still insisted? The speaker’s assertion merely skims the surface.

However, at the same time, we should not deny people’s desire to present their own opinion, no mater how weird these opinions might seem. Actually, it is just such “wield” ideas which have elevated our society form one step to another. When Einstein firstly published his theory of relativity, there were few scientists who could even understand it, let alone advocators. Because in that time most physicists believed if light is not a particle, it must be a wave and it is impossible light can be both of them. But in fact particle and wave are all possible forms of light as Einstein indicated in his paper. So for the development of the whole society we should allow people express their ideas freely, even such ideas are different from those held by the majority.

In conclusion, whether the leading voice is different from the prevailing opinion are decided by which fields this problem is concerned about. Nevertheless, no matter in which field we should all let people present their opinions, since the diversity of thoughts is significant to the development of our society in all respects.

雪夭UID：142334

According to the speaker, the leaders in any field are such people who desire to present some novel opinions and ideas which are different from the majority. Although I concede that some significant breakthroughs in the fields of both natural science and humanities do be made by people whose concepts or theories are totally unique, it is not the desire to be differentiated from the majority but the purpose of pursuing the truth that motivates those people who make leading voices. The speaker’s assertion is also too extreme and misleading in some sense, which I strongly disagree.

First, the speaker fails to consider some fields in which without support from the majority no one could be an opinion leader. Take political realm for instance. If a politician’s ideas and allegations are not accepted by the mass, how could he become a real leader? On the contrary, sometimes, it is not politicians’ unique ideas but their endeavors to accord to the popular opinions that make candidate succeed in vote. For example, if at present a politician still suggested to build a Utopia, which has no similarity with any current society, his（男女平等） allegation would definitely fail, no mentioned that would be a leading voice.（来个总结会比较好）

On the other hand（我不知道到底前面要不要对于on the one hand）, it is also ridiculous in scientific community to think that a scientist purposes （能做动词吗？）a new theory simply in order to show his（又来了） idea （两个动词了）differs from those held by the majority. Admittedly, there are plenty of preeminent researchers earn their academic reputation by presenting original and creative theories, which are totally different from the old ones. Yet, their achievements are all on the base of established laws and theory systems. And what motivated them to be the（去了） leader（s） in those fields is the desire for truth not for specializing themselves. If Bruno advocated the Heliocentric Model just for the purpose of differentiating himself from others, how could he stick to his theory so toughly that till he was sentenced and burned in the Roma Square by the Holy Office, he still insisted? （这个问号好怪啊）The speaker’s assertion merely skims the surface.

However, at the same time, we（少用点we） should not deny people’s desire to present their own opinion, no mater how weird these opinions might seem. Actually, it is just such “wield” ideas which have elevated our society form one step to another. When Einstein firstly published his theory of relativity, there were few scientists who could even understand it, let alone advocators. Because in that time most physicists believed if light is not a particle, it must be a wave and it is impossible light can be both of them. But in fact particle and wave are all possible forms of light as Einstein indicated in his paper. So for the development of the whole society we should allow people express their ideas freely, even such ideas are different from those held by the majority.

In conclusion, whether the leading voice is different from the prevailing opinion are decided by which fields this problem is concerned about. Nevertheless, no matter in which field we should all let people present their opinions, since the diversity of thoughts is significant to the development of our society in all respects.

句式用词上还要斟酌，we 和he 少出现，内容还不错，Einstein的例子尽量避免吧。

雪夭UID：142334

我写了没几天，探讨一下吧

The speaker asserts that leading voice comes from people who are motivated by the desires to present distinctive views rather than confirmation. I concede that creative and independent thinking really result in breakthrough and contribution; however, it is impossible to evaluate leading voices only depending on special thoughts; after all, an effective leader should not only lead the trend of ideas, but also analyze opinions entirely and convince the majority efficiently.

Granted, under some circumstances, to be an effective leader, a person's thought usually surpasses others and shows the ordinary people into a new environment. Without creative thinking and imagination, in any given field, the leadership will fall behind and the improvement might eschew such poor area. Obviously, the view can be demonstrated clearly in the academic field. Edison, a famous American inventor who patented more than a thousand inventions was appreciated for his originality creative ideas. In the absence of presenting those distinctive opinions, it is hard to imagine a society without light, phonograph and other useful machines; moreover it might also be a fatal pain in Edison’s individual life and the field of invention. Additionally, an executive in a company also is motivated by original plan and special ideas because leader should control the market and direction of management rather than simply follow the step of consumers. In other words, the ability of leaders can be reflected in innovation and original ideas and makes progress of fields.

However, simply presenting opinions and ideas that differ from common people might not only fail to lead others, but also cause troubles and threats. On the one hand, if a leader points out ideas and plans only relying on intuition or by accidents, the essence of opinions might full of flaws and defects. When a businessman carries out a new plan without analyzing market and the economic condition of the company, the program might lead to financial trouble, let alone the increase in profit. On the other hand, a leader should convince the majority about his or her ideas, or no one would support an opinion which is lack of credibility and feasibility. At the politics level, new concept of policies and ideas should be presented to the public experimentally in order to avoid of discontent and resistance. Therefore, showing new idea is the one step of leadership rather than the whole; meanwhile, the leader should establish firm evidence of his or her new opinions and try to convince the public.

Also, it is unfair to overlook the importance of conviction others and objective attitude to others ideas; otherwise, the leader would trap in frame of thoughts for limited knowledge and subjective position. Considering the human nature and individual restriction, any opinion, even pointed out by authorities, has shortcomings and omissions. As an effective leader, the one should realize the merits of others ideas and the disadvantages of own one. If the opinion of majority really has its reason and evidence, the leader should confirm and support it; on the contrary, if the leader's idea fails to consider the whole situation or have obvious flaws, he or she should restructure or give up the opinion. By convincing and reevaluating, opinions will become reasonable and appropriate so that the public can avoid of unnecessary risk and mistakes.

Understandably, creative and original thinking is the basic element and motivation of a leader, while it is possible to realize that blindly presenting distinctive views might lead to trouble and resistance rather than success. In any field, leaders must analyze and reexamine own ideas or others objectively, and then correct his or her attitude to opinion according to different situation.

DoDoqiangUID：154933

非常感谢同学的指点帮助ho！thank u！
坦白说，这篇文章我下笔很快，写着写着洒家自己都糊涂的
这个desire motivate people是末意思？
从你的文章来看，应该是说，领导者不光要追求有创新性的思维，而且还要结合客观事实分析，并且修正自己的观点。（对么？）
但我理解题中重点考虑应该是这个desire吧，也就是领导者们是由什么motivated。
speaker人为不是出于肯定他人，而是标新立异这个动机（很诡异）

雪夭UID：142334

那个是喜欢提出不同的意见
我拔了一点高度，立在领导的作用上，所以写了他们必须是思维的领导者，但是不是盲目的追求不同，也需要去肯定别人，修正自己
看见conviction么？因为我让步，所以我写了他们必须要正视其他人正确的想法

DoDoqiangUID：154933

oh, 原来系这个意思啊
收到收到
的确高我不止一点
BTW： 在你文章里用confirmation 替换了 conviction 这两个意思一样的么？

雪夭UID：142334

这个就问倒我了，没用MW所以我不确定，我是用表肯定的意思，不知道可否啊